protein structure
play

Protein Structure Michael Schroeder Joachim Haupt Melissa Adasme - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Protein Structure Michael Schroeder Joachim Haupt Melissa Adasme Biotechnology Center TU Dresden Hierarchical structure of proteins Heim et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010 2 wwpdb.org 3 Gorbi.irb.hr 4 Actinidin and Papain 50%


  1. Protein Structure Michael Schroeder Joachim Haupt Melissa Adasme Biotechnology Center TU Dresden

  2. Hierarchical structure of proteins Heim et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010 2

  3. wwpdb.org 3

  4. Gorbi.irb.hr 4

  5. Actinidin and Papain 50% sequence ID, same structure 5

  6. Hemoglobin and Leghemoglobin 11% sequence ID, same structure 6

  7. Same family Same superfamily, but not family Twilight zone 7

  8. Structure prediction Secondary structure prediction Homology modelling Ab initio prediction Rosetta Evfold 8

  9. Structure prediction 9 David Jones, UCL, 1997

  10. Structure prediction Ramachandran plot 10

  11. Rosetta 11

  12. Rosetta 12

  13. EVfold Structure Prediction from Multiple Sequence Alignments 13 Marks et al., PLoS One , 2011 13

  14. Evfold Direct Information Statistical Model 14 Marks et al., PLoS One , 2011 14

  15. EVfold Examples 15 Marks et al., PLoS One , 2011 15

  16. 16

  17. SCOP : S tructural C lassification o f P roteins top CLASS All alpha All Beta Alpha+Beta Alpha/Beta FOLD Trypsin-like serine proteases Immunoglobulin-like SUPERFAMILY Distant common ancestor Low sequence similarity Transglutaminase Immunoglobulin FAMILY Closer evolutionary relationship C1 set domains V set domains >30 sequence identity (antibody constant) (antibody variable) 17

  18. All alpha All beta 18

  19. Alpha and beta Alpha plus beta 19

  20. Membrane proteins Aquaporin 1ih5 20

  21. Hou et al. PNAS, 2003 21

  22. Structure Alignment 22

  23. 23

  24. G proteins (P-loop) Conformational change on GTP or GDP binding 24

  25. Citrate Synthase 1cts, 5cts 25

  26. Lactoferrin  iron-binding protein in secretions such as milk or tears  Rotation of 54º upon iron-binding 1lfh,1lfg 26

  27. Dynamic programming for structure alignment  Sequence a and b  Score for a i and b j = 1 / distance d(a i , b j )  No gap penalties 27

  28. Double Dynamic programming for structure alignment  For all pairs a i and b j:  Superpose a i and b j  Dynamic programming of previous slide  Add best aligned residues to overall alignment  Double dynamic programming is basis of SSAP used for CATH 28

  29. Scoring a structural alignment  Sequences: matching residues  Structure: root mean square deviation (RMSD) 29

  30. RMSD: Root Mean Square Deviation  Distance of points a = (a x ,a y ) and b=(b x , b y )? a b 30

  31. RMSD: Root Mean Square Deviation  RMSD=average distance of aligned atoms  Given the distances δ i between n aligned atoms, the RMSD is defined as: 31

  32. Quality of alignment  RMSD is measured in Ångstrom (Å)  1 Å = 0.1 nm RMSD = 0 Å: Identical structures  RMSD < 3 Å: Similar structures  32

  33. Pitfalls of RMSD  RMSD is size dependent  All atoms treated equally (e.g. core residues less flexible than surface residues)  Best alignment not always minimal RMSD 33

  34. Large complexes 34

  35. GroEL/GroES 35

  36. Modelling large complexes: Set1 Tuukkanen et al. Proteomics, 2010 36

  37. What is a domain? 37

  38. What is a domain?  Functional : independent unit  Physiochemical : hydrophobic core  Topological :  Intra-domain distances of atoms are minimal,  Inter-domain distances maximal 38

  39. Domains are independent units 1in5 1a5t P-loop (green/orange) P-loop domain (green & orange) Winged helix DNA binding domain DNA polymerase III domain 39

  40. Domains have hydrophobic core Kyte & Doolittle, JMB, 1982 By Michael Schroeder, Biotec, 40

  41. Intra-domain distances minimal  Distances between atoms within domain are minimal  Distances between atoms of two different domains are maximal By Michael Schroeder, Biotec, 41

  42. Motifs 42

  43. Interface helices: L-x-S-I-[GP] Glutamate symporter Serine protease Cytochrome bc1 1kb9 2ic8 2nwl Marsico et al. BMC Bioinf., 2010 43

  44. Protein interactions 44

  45. Families and Interfaces  One family pair = one interface?  No, 40% of families have alternative binding modes  One interface = one family?  10% of interfaces have more than one interactor Kim et al., PLoS CB, 2006 45

  46. Two domains, many interface Long chained cytokine (center) and fibronectin type III domains (peripheral) Kim et al., PLoS CB, 2006 46

  47. One interface, many families Subtilisin/Chymotrypsin. Catalytic triad (Asp, His, Ser) in pink 47

  48. Viral mimicry of native interfaces 48

  49. Baculovirus p35 mimics human protein Viral p35 Human Caspase + = Human IAP By Human Mic Caspase hae l Sch roe der, Biot 49 Henschel et al., Bioinformatics 2006 ec

  50. One interface, many families Henschel, et al. Bioinf., 2006 Caspase 3, Inhibitor of Apoptosis (green), and Baculovirus p35 (yellow) 50

  51. HIV Nef mimics human protein HIV NEF Human SH3 + = Human Human SH3 Henschel et al., Bioinformatics 2006 51

  52. HIV Nef mimics native PxxP motif Virus Human Nef Kinase 52 Henschel et al., Bioinformatics 2006

  53. HIV capsid mimics human protein HIV capsid Human Cyclophilin + = Human Cyclophilin Human Cyclophilin 53 Henschel et al., Bioinformatics 2006

  54. Drug repositioning 54

  55. One interface, many families 55

  56. Heinrich et al. J Cancer Res clin Onc, 2011 56

  57. 57

Recommend


More recommend