property plant and equipment
play

Property, plant and equipment Valuation Impairment Common - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Property, plant and equipment Valuation Impairment Common challenges Ric De Santi Deputy Auditor-General Appropriate valuation approach Building or infrastructure asset/network Saleable in an active market, Not saleable in an active market


  1. Property, plant and equipment Valuation Impairment Common challenges Ric De Santi Deputy Auditor-General

  2. Appropriate valuation approach Building or infrastructure asset/network Saleable in an active market, Not saleable in an active market capable of generating net cash or capable of generating net cash inflows, or surplus to the entity’s inflows, but being used to needs achieve the entity’s objectives Fair value using the market approach, income approach, or Fair value using current a combination of these replacement cost approaches For your infrastructure assets still in use, Poll what valuation approach do you use? 14

  3. Depreciated Replacement Cost Current Replacement Cost 15

  4. Current replacement cost Defined by AASB 13: • a valuation technique that reflects the amount that would be required to currently replace the service capacity of an asset. • Current replacement cost is the cost to …. acquire or construct a substitute asset of comparable utility, adjusted for obsolescence. 16

  5. Overview of current replacement cost Current Gross Accumulated replacement replacement depreciation cost cost 17

  6. Deriving gross replacement cost Current cost Adjustment for Gross of modern excess utility replacement and other substitute cost obsolescence asset 18

  7. Current cost of modern substitute asset Current cost of a significant Number of Unit rate part of the units modern asset 19

  8. 20

  9. 21

  10. Impairment Obsolesence 22

  11. Type of obsolesence Description Example Adjustment required for example Functional (technological) Functional obsolescence For infrastructure, In this example, entities obsolescence includes: examples of functional should base the gross • Superseded design, obsolescence additional to replacement cost on the technology or materials that captured by smaller sized substitute. • Over-engineering adjustment for excess utility are rare. The modern substitute asset is typically devoid of functional obsolescence. Adjustments for excess utility capture functional obsolescence. Economic (external) When external influences A recently constructed The substitute asset is a obsolescence such as changes in school that is of a modern smaller sized school population, income levels standard, but whose sufficient to cater for the or the regulatory required maximum future revised estimates of future environment cause a capacity has decreased student numbers. permanent decrease in because of the Therefore, adjustments demand for related unexpected closure of a are needed to gross services. mine that was the major replacement cost to employer in the region. reflect the decrease in size A hypothetical willing required. market buyer would only be prepared to incur the costs required to meet an asset’s expected future peak level of demand. 23

  12. Case study Poll What impact, if any, will there be on GRC? 24

  13. 25

  14. Calculating accumulated depreciation • The current replacement cost valuation approach involves making adjustments for obsolescence. • Although obsolescence is broader than depreciation, it still includes depreciation. • The physical deterioration portion of obsolescence is essentially its accumulated depreciation. 26

  15. 27

  16. Calculating accumulated depreciation Percentage of Accumulated total useful life Depreciable consumed to depreciation amount date Gross Total useful Residual replacement Life to date life value cost 28

  17. Obsolescence 29

  18. 30

  19. Common challenges 1. Determining the valuation approach with consideration for highest and best use 2. Identifying the significant parts of an infrastructure asset 3. Deciding whether to use greenfield or brownfield costs 4. Reviewing useful lives and residual values 5. Utilising condition ratings appropriately 6. Reviewing and documenting valuation assumptions and inputs 31

  20. Common challenges #1 Determining the valuation approach with consideration for highest and best use 32

  21. 33

  22. 34

  23. Common challenges #2 Identifying the significant parts of an infrastructure asset 35

  24. Meaning of ‘an item of property, plant and equipment’ 36

  25. 37

  26. Significant parts (Components) 38

  27. Common challenges #3 Deciding whether to use greenfield or brownfield costs 39

  28. 40

  29. 41

  30. Common challenges #4 Reviewing useful lives and residual values 42

  31. 43

  32. 44

  33. Common challenges #5 Utilising condition ratings appropriately 45

  34. Use of conditions assessments Poll 46

  35. Depreciation 47

  36. Common challenges #6 Reviewing and documenting valuation assumptions and inputs – General principles for documenting valuations – Expectations for documenting an annual review of valuations 48

  37. What to do between comprehensive revaluations? 49

  38. Other matters Asset recognition/de-recognition  Prior period error Found assets  Asset recognised at fair Land transfers value in income statement  Derecognised Scrapped or demolished assets  Reduced useful life or Damaged assets derecognised  Reclassify, market valuation Assets held for sale  AASB 138 Intangible assets 50

Recommend


More recommend