Progress Index National Economic Dialogue Dublin, 28 June 2017 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2017 Social Progress Index National Economic Dialogue Dublin, 28 June 2017 Michael Green CEO, Social Progress Imperative

How do we advance society? Economic Social Progress Development The factors which GDP per capita make up a good life for individuals and a healthy society

Social Progress Index design principles:

The Social Progress framework answers universally important questions

The Social Progress Index is an aggregate index of social and environmental indicators that capture three dimensions of social progress It includes data from 128 countries on 50 indicators • An additional 61 countries have partial results It includes 98% of the world population

The average world score rose from 63.19 in 2014 to 64.85 in 2017 – a 2.6% increase

Ireland ranks 11 th in 2017 Social Progress Index

Social Progress Index vs GDP per capita Across the 1 00 VERY HIGH spectrum, we D enmark N orway N ew Zealand Netherlands C anada S witzerland G ermany Ireland U nited K ingdom A ustria P ortugal Japan C zech R epublic U nited S tates see how some F rance C hile C yprus Italy HIGH U ruguay 80 C osta R ica Israel C roatia countries are cores A rgentina Brazil P eru S Jamaica K uwait MIDDLE UPPER ocial Progress Index S ocial Progress Mexico Malaysia G eorgia much better at Montenegro T urkey S audi A rabia Bolivia R ussia A zerbaijan MIDDLE turning their LOWER Iran Mongolia 60 G hana India Index Tiers economic Laos LOW N igeria 7 S growth into C ongo, R epublic of C ameroon 201 Y emen N iger social 40 A ngola A fghanistan VERY LOW progress than C entral A frican R epublic others 20 0K 5K 1 0K 1 5K 20K 25K 30K 35K 40K 45K 50K 55K 60K 65K 70K G DP per capita, PPP (constant 201 1 international $)

Social Progress Index vs GDP per capita Ireland shows 1 00 VERY HIGH a very high D enmark N orway N ew Zealand Netherlands C anada S witzerland G ermany Ireland U nited K ingdom A ustria P ortugal Japan C zech R epublic U nited S tates level of social F rance C hile C yprus Italy HIGH U ruguay 80 C osta R ica Israel C roatia progress at a cores A rgentina Brazil P eru S Jamaica K uwait MIDDLE UPPER ocial Progress Index S ocial Progress Mexico Malaysia G eorgia very high level Montenegro T urkey S audi A rabia Bolivia R ussia Ireland A zerbaijan MIDDLE of GDP per LOWER Iran Mongolia 60 G hana India Index Tiers capita. Laos LOW N igeria 7 S C ongo, R epublic of C ameroon 201 Y emen N iger 40 A ngola A fghanistan VERY LOW C entral A frican R epublic 20 0K 5K 1 0K 1 5K 20K 25K 30K 35K 40K 45K 50K 55K 60K 65K 70K G DP per capita, PPP (constant 201 1 international $)

S TR E NG TH/ S C OR E R ANK W E AKNE S S 201 7 S ocial Progress Index 88.91 1 1 /1 28 IRE LAND G DP PPP per capita $61 ,378 3/1 28 S C OR E / S TR E NG TH/ S C OR E / S TR E NG TH/ S C OR E / S TR E NG TH/ V ALUE R ANK W E AKNE S S V ALUE R ANK W E AKNE S S V ALUE R ANK W E AKNE S S B asic Human Needs 93.03 20 Foundations of W ellbeing 87 .86 1 6 O pportunity 85.86 4 A cces s to B as ic K nowledge 98.85 1 3 Nutrition and B as ic Medical C are 99.23 25 P ers onal R ights 93.09 1 0 U ndernourishment (% 5.00 1 of pop .; 5 signifies ≤ 5) A dult literacy rate (% P olitical rights (0=no rights; 40=full rights) 39.00 1 3 of pop. aged 1 5+) D epth of food deficit F reedom of expression P rimary school enrollment (% 99.30 29 of children) 8.00 1 1 6.00 1 (calories/undernourished person; 8 signifies ≤ 8) (0=no freedom; 1 6=full freedom) S econdary school enrollment (% 1 00.00 1 of children) M aternal mortality rate (deaths/1 F reedom of assembly 00,000 live 7 .70 25 births) G ender parity in secondary enrollment (0=no freedom; 1 =full freedom) 0.02 42 (distance from parity) P rivate property rights (0=none; 1 90.00 3 C hild mortality rate (deaths/1 3.60 1 4 00=full) ,000 live births) D eaths from infectious diseases A cces s to Information 89.98 1 3 28.84 45 P ers onal Freedom and C hoice 83.71 1 5 (deaths/1 00,000) and C ommunications F reedom over life choices (% 86.31 25 satisfied) W ater and S anitation 95.34 41 M obile telephone subscriptions 1 00.00 1 F reedom of religion (1 4.00 1 (subscriptions/1 00 people) =low; 4=high) A ccess to piped water (% 97 .88 35 of pop.) Internet users (% 80.1 2 21 E arly marriage (% 0.00 1 of pop.) of women aged 1 5-1 9) R ural access to improved water source 97 .84 46 P ress F reedom Index S atisfied demand for contraception 1 2.40 9 (% of pop.) 79.50 40 (0=most free; 1 00=least free) (% of women) A ccess to improved sanitation facilities 90.48 56 C orruption (0=high; 1 73.00 1 6 00=low) (% of pop.) Health and W ellnes s 80.49 1 7 T olerance and Inclus ion 86.21 2 S helter 87 .82 1 7 Life expectancy at 60 (years) 24.1 4 1 8 P remature deaths from non-communicable T olerance for immigrants (0=low; 1 84.76 6 A vailability of af ordable housing (% satisfied) 50.05 55 00=high) 224.1 0 1 6 diseases (deaths/1 00,000) T olerance for homosexuals (0=low; 1 82.31 9 A ccess to electricity (% 1 00.00 1 00=high) of pop.) S uicide rate (deaths/1 9.84 57 00,000) D iscrimination and violence against Q uality of electricity supply (1 6.46 1 4 =low; 7=high) 1 .60 2 minorities (0=low; 1 0=high) E nvironmental Q uality 82.1 1 23 Household air pollution attributable deaths 0.00 1 R eligious tolerance (1 3.00 54 (deaths/1 00,000) =low; 4=high) O utdoor air pollution attributable deaths 1 9.26 1 4 C ommunity safety net (0=low; 1 95.66 2 (deaths/1 00,000) 00=high) P ers onal S afety 89.72 1 6 W astewater treatment (% 51 .1 1 34 of wastewater) A cces s to Advanced E ducation 80.42 6 Homicide rate (deaths/1 1 .1 0 28 00,000) B iodiversity and habitat 90.51 40 (0=no protection; 1 00=high protection) Y ears of tertiary schooling 1 .68 4 L evel of violent crime (1 2.00 20 =low; 5=high) G reenhouse gas emissions 290.56 31 omen ’ s average years in school W 1 4.53 21 P erceived criminality (1 2.00 1 =low; 5=high) (CO2 equivalents per GDP) Inequality in the attainment of education P olitical terror (1 1 .00 1 0.05 29 =low; 5=high) (0=low; 1 =high) T raf c deaths (deaths/1 4.1 0 9 00,000) N umber of globally ranked universities 5.00 23 (0=none; 1 0=most highly rank ed) P ercent of tertiary students enrolled in globally 5.00 6 ranked universities S trengths and weaknesses (0=none; 6=highest enrollment) Overperforming by 1 or more pts. Oveperforming and underperforming are relative to 1 5 countries of similar G DP per capita: Overperforming by less than 1 pt. P erforming within the expected range S audi Arabia, United S tates, Netherlands, Austria, S weden, Denmark, S witzerland, Underperforming by less than 1 pt. G ermany, Australia, Canada, Belgium, Iceland, Finland, United Kingdom, France Underperforming by 1 or more pts. No data available

Social Progress Index helps: • Design programmes and policies. • Direct investments and assess risks. • Forge new partnerships and catalyze innovation. • Track progress toward the complementary Sustainable Development Goals