privacy expectations and preferences in an iot world
play

Privacy Expectations and Preferences in an IoT World Pardis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Privacy Expectations and Preferences in an IoT World Pardis Emami-Naeini, Sruti Bhagavatula, Martin Degeling, Hana Habib, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Norman Sadeh PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 1 PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT


  1. Privacy Expectations and Preferences in an IoT World Pardis Emami-Naeini, Sruti Bhagavatula, Martin Degeling, Hana Habib, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Norman Sadeh PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 1

  2. PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 2

  3. Do you know: § What are they collecting? § Who are they sharing your data with? § For how long are they keeping your data? PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 3

  4. Now imagine the future § What are they collecting? § Who are they sharing my data with? § For how long are they keeping my data? PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 4

  5. Design questions § Informing people about data collections • What should we notify people about? § Giving some choices to control privacy • What factors make people comfortable? • What factors make people allow/deny a data collection? PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 5

  6. Design questions § Making the system automated • How well can we predict people preferences? PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 6

  7. Vignette study § Capture wide range of scenarios § Stories about individuals, situations and structures which can make reference to important points in the study of perceptions, beliefs and attitudes (Hughes 1998) PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 7

  8. Scenarios varied by 8 factors • Type of data collected • Location of data collection • Device collecting data • Retention time • Purpose of data collection • Who benefits from data collection • Whether or not data is shared • Whether more info could be inferred PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 8

  9. Example scenario § You are at [work] . This building has [cameras] that are recording [video of the entire building] . The video is [shared with law enforcement] to [improve public safety] and they [will not delete it] . PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 9

  10. Example scenario § You are at a [department store] . This store has an [iris scanner] that scans customers' irises automatically as they enter the store in order to [remotely identify returning customers] . Your iris scan will be kept for [one week] . PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 10

  11. Studied 380 IoT scenarios 14 126,720 380 No nonsense 14 scenarios scenarios 14 PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 11

  12. Our participants § 1007 Mechanical Turk participants § From the United States § Avg. age: 35.3 § ~15 minutes to complete PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 12

  13. Questions per scenario § I would want my mobile phone to notify me [every time / only the first time / every once in a while] this data collection occurs. • five point scale from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree” PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 13

  14. Questions per scenario § How would you feel about the data collection in the situation described above if you were given no additional information about the scenario? • five point scale from “very comfortable to “very uncomfortable” § If you had the choice, would you allow or deny this data collection? • Choices: allow, deny PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 14

  15. Model selection § GLMM + random intercept § Backward elimination PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 15

  16. Model: Every time notification § Most impactful explanatory factor: • Biometrics for an unspecified purpose (coef: 0.88, 61%) • Presence for a not beneficial purpose (coef: -0.49, 27%) § Least impactful explanatory factor: • data collected at a department store (coef: -0.69, 42%) PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 16

  17. Model: Comfort level § Most impactful explanatory factor: • Video collection happening today (coef: 1.39, 69%) • Biometrics (coef: -1.45, 28%) § Least impactful explanatory factor: • Data being kept forever (coef: 0.10, 48%) PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 17

  18. Model: Desire to Allow/Deny § Most impactful explanatory factor: • Video collected at department store (coef: -0.9, 66%) • Presence collected at work (coef: 2.11, 36%) § Least impactful explanatory factor: • Data being shared (coef: 0.52, 45%) PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 18

  19. Prediction accuracy § Comfort level: • ~81% § Desire to allow or deny: • ~79% PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 19

  20. Preferences in a nutshell § Anonymous data types “I’d be fine with data that doesn’t identify me.” § Public vs. private “[I would be] comfortable with public spaces, absolutely not comfortable in my home.” PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 20

  21. Preferences in a nutshell § Ranked 1 st = Type of data + X • Notification X = user perceived benefit • comfort X = happening today • allow/deny X = location PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 21

  22. Our results design § Design personalized privacy systems § In progress: experience sampling More info: www.privacyassistant.org Pardis Emami-Naeini , Sruti Bhagavatula, Martin Degeling, Hana Habib, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Norman Sadeh PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 22

Recommend


More recommend