Precursors of Colorectal Carcinoma Precursors of Colorectal Carcinoma Arzu Ensari, MD, PhD Department of Pathology Ankara University Medical School
Hyperplastic polyp Hyperplastic polyp Adenomatous polyp Adenomatous polyp
Colorectal carcinoma IBD-associated (1-2%) Hereditary (20%) Sporadic (80%) APC 10-80 % MSI 2-14 % Lynch syndrome FAP Adenoma-carcinoma Serrated neoplasia 70-80% 20-30% MMR MSI/ MSI CIN APC CIMP Wnt Peutz Jeghers MAP Juvenile polyposis syndrome syndrome MYH SMAD4/MADH4/ SMAD4/MADH4/ STK11/LKB1 BMPR1A
Colorectal carcinoma IBD-associated Sporadic Hereditary IEN Flat/polypoid Lynch syndrome FAP Adenoma-carcinoma Serrated neoplasia Serrated Adenoma Adenoma polyp Adenoma MAP Peutz Jeghers Juvenile polyposis syndrome syndrome Adenoma PJ Juvenile polyp polyp
Molecular classification of CRC
Precursor lesions Non-polypoid lesions • ACF (hyperplastic/dysplastic) • “Flat” adenoma • IBD-associated IEN (f lat) Polypoid lesions • Adenomatous polyps (tubular, tubulovillous, villous) • Serrated polyps (Hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp, traditional serrated adenoma) • IBD-associated IEN (polypoid=DALM) • Hereditary syndromes (FAP, HNPCC, PJS, Juvenile polyposis, Serrated polyposis) Geboes et al, 2005
Pathologist’s task… • Correct classification • Grading of dysplasia • Adequacy of endoscopic intervention • Risk assessment • Guidance for management and surveillance
Adenoma-carcinoma sequence (CIN pathway) APC/ TP53 KRAS → → → → → → CIMP- β -catenin 18q LOH MSS TGF β BRAF & KRAS WT Loss of inhibition of proliferation Fearon & Vogelstein, 1988
Aberrant Crypt Focus • Crypts 2-3 times larger than normal in chromoendoscopy • Microscopic types: • Hyperplastic type (serrated) • Dysplastic type (adenomatous) • Accompanies adenomas, cancer & polyposis syndromes
Classification of adenomas HG adenoma in 1% of TA HG adenoma in 14% TVA or VA Lash, 2010 TVA VA TA
Flat (superficial) adenoma • ≤ 3mm tall, ≤ 2 times as normal mucosa • Predilection to proximal colon • Flat carcinoma can arise de novo ( Wada, 1996; Hurlstone, 2003) • IIa (elevated), IIb (flat), IIc (depressed)
Risk factors in adenomas • Multiplicity (>3) • Size • <1cm size – <1% • 1-2cm – 10% • >2cm – 20-50% • Villous architecture (VA 29.8% > TA 3.9%) • HG dysplasia • Site ? Advanced adenoma: > 1cm OR > 25% villous architecture OR HG dysplasia / IEN Bertario, 2003, Mitchell, 2008
ESGE Vienna WHO TNM 1. No neoplasia Category 1 2. Low grade Category 3 (LG dysplasia LG IEN neoplasia LG adenoma) 3. High grade Category 4.1-4.4 HG IEN pTis neoplasia HG dysplasia/ HG adenoma Non-invasive carcinoma (in situ ca) Suspicious for invasive carcinoma Intramucosal carcinoma (invasion of LP) 4. Carcinoma 4a. Carcinoma Category 5 Invasive pT1 confined to Submucosal invasion (invasion through carcinoma submucosa MM into submucosa) 4b. Carcinoma Category 5 Invasive pT2-T4 beyond submucosa carcinoma
“Malignant” adenoma = pT1 CRC “adenoma in which cancer has invaded through the muscularis mucosa into the submucosa” • 2.6-10% of all polyps • 8-16% LN metastasis • High risk (35%) or low risk (7%) of LN met
Margin Margin Depth of invasion Depth of invasion Clearance <1mm is (+) Clearance <1mm is (+) Haggitt levels – pedunculated Haggitt levels – pedunculated Kikuchi levels – sessile Kikuchi levels – sessile Ueno: Depth 1-2mm/ width 4-5mm Ueno: Depth 1-2mm/ width 4-5mm Tumour grade Tumour grade LVI LVI HG in 5-10% HG in 5-10% D2-40, CD31, EVG D2-40, CD31, EVG Common in sessile polyps Common in sessile polyps Poor reproducibility Poor reproducibility HG – 50% LN met. HG – 50% LN met. LVI – 31%LN met. LVI – 31%LN met. Tumour stroma Tumour stroma Tumour budding Tumour budding Lymphoid vs nonlymphoid Lymphoid vs nonlymphoid Single cells or clusters <4 cells Single cells or clusters <4 cells at invasion front at invasion front X20 objective (0.785mm 2 ) X20 objective (0.785mm 2 ) Tumour budding score Tumour budding score
Haggitt levels • pT1 CA in adenoma • Depth of sm: 9mm • Width: 6mm • Haggitt 2 LN metastasis + • Grade 2 • Cribriform pattern • Lymphatic invasion • No lymphoid infilt. • Margin free • Excision complete Egashira, 2004
Kikuchi levels 10% 1-3% 25% • pT1 CA in adenoma • Depth: 1.38mm • Width: 3.5mm • Haggitt 4 (sessile) • Kikuchi sm3 LN metastasis - • Grade 1 • No LV invasion • Lymphoid infilt. + • Margin free • Excision complete Egashira 2004
Serrated neoplasia sequence (MSI/CIMP pathway) → → → mutations promoter methylation MSI-H/CIMP-H KRAS/ MSI hMLH1 MSI-L BRAF MGMT MSS Inhibition of apoptosis Jass, 2000
Classification of serrated polyps SSA/P HP TSA 75% of serrated polyps 75% of serrated polyps 25% of serrated polyps 25% of serrated polyps <1% of serrated polyps <1% of serrated polyps Flat & distal Flat & distal Flat & proximal Flat & proximal Pedunculated/flat Pedunculated/flat KRAS–distal/goblet cell KRAS–distal/goblet cell BRAF / MLH-1 BRAF / MLH-1 Distal Distal methylation methylation KRAS/BRAF mutation KRAS/BRAF mutation BRAF–prox/ microvesic. BRAF–prox/ microvesic.
Resemblance to normal colon Dilatation in upper half HP Narrow crypt base Serration in upper half Undifferentiated cells
Microvesicular (MVHP) • Commonest HP • Entire colon • “Serration” prominent • Microvacuolation • Precursor of SSA/P ? • BRAF mutation Goblet cell (GCHP) • Second common • Left colon • Hyperplastic goblet cells • “Serration” subtle • KRAS mutation • Precursor of TSA? Mucin-poor (MPHP) • Very rare • “Serration” prominent • Nuclear atypia present • Mutation?
Deep crypt branchin g Serration at basal crypts Dilatation at basal crypts SSA/P Inverted crypts «Funny» crypts
Complex crypt architecture Ectopic crypts TSA Cytoplasmic eosinophilia Exaggerated serration Midphasic nuclei
Morphologic variants of TSA Chetty R. J Clin Pathol 2016;69:6–11 Flat Filiform Mucin-rich/ goblet cell rich
ECF in TSAs • Kim - 79% • Wiland - 62% • Vayrynen - 100% • O’Brien - ECFs related to villous morphology rather than serrated morphology Pattern of luminal serration: slit-like Ectopic crypts Cytoplasmic eosinophilia Histopathology. 66, 308-313, 2016
Dysplasia in serrated polyps • LG and HG dysplasia can occur • Two types of dysplasia: • Adenomatous dysplasia • Serrated dysplasia (Goldstein, 2008) • enlarged round nuclei • irregular nuclear membrane • prominent nucleoli • coarse chromatin
HP / SSA/P? Transitional Localization and size! forms? Dx: Serrated polyp – «unclassified» SSA/P / TSA?
"Traditional serrated adenoma or serrated tubulovillous adenoma: Which is which?" C Cansiz Ersöz, S Yüksel, A Kirmizi, B Savas, A Ensari Virchows Archiv, Volume 469, Supplement 1, September 2016, PS-16-047, S158 TSA TSA LG dysplasia TSA HG dysplasia
CK20 CDX2 MUC5AC Muc6 Muc2 p53 Ki67 B-catenin MLH1 PMS2 p16
Other sites in GIT • TSA were reported in the oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, and gallbladder
Slow-Growing Early Adenocarcinoma Arising from Traditional Serrated Adenoma in the Duodenum Yoon Kyoo Park Woo Jin Jeong Gab Jin Cheon Case Rep Gastroenterol 2016;10:257–263 35 gastric TSA 74.3% carcinoma
G A S T R I C T S A
ESGE, 2012
Polyposis syndromes • Rare • Otosomal dominant (except MAP) • High risk for GI and extra-intestinal cancer • Characterized by the predominant polyp • Phenotypic overlaps • Classification • polyp type, age of presentation, GI distribution, polyp number, extraintestinal findings, genetic abnormality
Colorectal polyposis syndromes FAP MAP Lynch Synd PJS JPS SPS Incidence 1:7000- 1:5000- 1:370 1:25000- 1:100000 1: 1000- 30000 10000 300000 5000 Polyp type Adenoma Adenoma Adenoma Peutz jeghers Juvenile polyp Serrated >100 10-100 <10 polyp polyp (HP, HP, SP SSA/P, TSA) Genetic Germline APC Mutations in Germline STK11/LKB1 SMAD4/ Germline abnormality mutations MUTYH gene mutations in MADH4/ mutations in MMR genes BMPR1A senescence genes? Risk 100% 40-100% 70-80% 20-40% 20-70% 25-50% Extra-GI Osteomas, Extra GI Endometrial Pigmentation malformations - features desmoids, cancers cancer gliomas
Thank you..
Recommend
More recommend