pre conference session master class
play

Pre-Conference Session - Master Class PTAB Bar Association - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pre-Conference Session - Master Class PTAB Bar Association Conference Wednesday, March 13, 2019 1 Master Class - Panel 1 On Your Mark: Petitioner Strategy 2 Panel 1 On Your Mark: Petitioner Strategy Getting Started: Grappling with the


  1. Pre-Conference Session - Master Class PTAB Bar Association Conference Wednesday, March 13, 2019 1

  2. Master Class - Panel 1 On Your Mark: Petitioner Strategy 2

  3. Panel 1 On Your Mark: Petitioner Strategy Getting Started: Grappling with the Discretion of 314(a) & 325(d) 3

  4. POLL OPEN Poll Question #1: All things being equal, would you rather file a joint petition with a co-defendant, or file your own petition two months after the co-defendant files a petition? 1 a. File jointly 0% 2 b. File separately 0% 4

  5. Panel 1 On Your Mark: Petitioner Strategy Proving Public Accessibility of Prior Art 5

  6. POLL OPEN Poll Question #2: Has the Board’s handling of non -patent literature prior art kept you from filing a petition or from using non-patent literature in a petition? 1 a. Yes 0% 2 b. No 0% 6

  7. Panel 1 On Your Mark: Petitioner Strategy Impact of SAS Institute on Petitioner Strategy 7

  8. Panel 1 On Your Mark: Petitioner Strategy Impact of Phillips on Claim Construction Strategy in Petitions 8

  9. Panel 1 On Your Mark: Petitioner Strategy Addressing Real Party-in-Interest Issues at the Petition Stage 9

  10. POLL OPEN Poll Question #3: If, as Petitioner, you anticipate Patent Owner raising RPI issues in the POPR, do you proactively include evidence and/or argument in the Petition addressing the issue? 1 a. Yes, I would include declaration testimony. 0% 2 b. Yes, but I would only include argument without evidence. 0% 3 c. No, I would wait until after Patent Owner raises the issue. 0% 10

  11. Master Class - Panel 2 Set the Pace: Patent Owner Defense Strategy 11

  12. Panel 2 Set the Pace: Patent Owner Defense Strategy Using RPI as a Defense Strategy 12

  13. Panel 2 Set the Pace: Patent Owner Defense Strategy Preliminary Responses 13

  14. POLL OPEN Poll Question #4: Does the SAS Institute all-or-nothing institution requirement most benefit the Petitioner or the Patent Owner? 1 a. Petitioner 0% 2 b. Patent Owner 0% 14

  15. Panel 2 Set the Pace: Patent Owner Defense Strategy Impact of Phillips Claim Construction on Patent Owner Strategy 15

  16. POLL OPEN Poll Question #5: Do you think district courts will pay more attention to PTAB claim construction in light of the change to the Phillips standard? 1 a. Yes, I've seen it 0% 2 b. Yes, but I have not seen it yet 0% 3 c. No, I don't think there will be much difference 0% 16

  17. Master Class - Panel 3 The Bell Lap: Trial Strategy 17

  18. Panel 3 The Bell Lap: Trial Strategy Depositions 18

  19. Panel 3 The Bell Lap: Trial Strategy Claim Amendment Pilot Program 19

  20. POLL OPEN Poll Question #6: If you were given the opportunity to opt out of the pilot program in favor of filing a motion to amend under the original program, would you do so? 1 a. Yes 0% 2 b. No 0% 20

  21. Panel 3 The Bell Lap: Trial Strategy Patent Owner Sur-Reply 21

  22. POLL OPEN Poll Question #7: Do you expect the guarantee of a sur-reply to result in more final decisions favorable to Patent Owner? 1 a. Yes 0% 2 b. No 0% 22

  23. Panel 3 The Bell Lap: Trial Strategy Oral Hearing 23

  24. POLL OPEN Poll Question #8: Should the Board decide all motions to exclude at a pre-hearing conference? 1 a. Yes, it would simplify the oral hearing 0% 2 b. No, I would like the opportunity to present arguments at the hearing 0% 24

  25. Panel 3 The Bell Lap: Trial Strategy Motion Practice 25

  26. Panel 3 The Bell Lap: Trial Strategy Rehearing 26

  27. POLL OPEN Poll Question #9: After an adverse Final Written Decision, how likely are you to seek rehearing? 1 a. Never 0% 2 b. Only on a glaring mistake of law or fact 0% 3 c. Always, I have nothing to lose 0% 27

Recommend


More recommend