parks and recreation master plan
play

Parks and Recreation Master Plan Inspiring communities to action - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Parks and Recreation Master Plan Inspiring communities to action Agenda Influencing Factors Focus Group and Stakeholder Key Themes Website Participation Intercept Survey Online Survey Statistically Valid Survey


  1. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Inspiring communities to action

  2. Agenda • Influencing Factors • Focus Group and Stakeholder Key Themes • Website Participation • Intercept Survey • Online Survey • Statistically Valid Survey • Prioritized Needs • Next Steps

  3. Influencing Factors

  4. • Town Average Annual Growth rate = 1% Population • US Average Annual Growth Rate = 0.8%

  5. • Today, 48.7% of the population is 55+ • By 2034, 58.1% of population will be 55+ Age Segmentation

  6. • Culture often influences park and recreation experiences Ethnicity

  7. COMPARATIVE INCOME CHARACTERISTICS Higher Income Levels. Per Capita Income Median Household Income Provide high quality $85,173 experiences with a focus on cost recovery $58,100 $54,974 $49,475 $31,950 $28,634 Income Oro Valley Arizona U.S.A.

  8. Holistic and Continuous Public Input

  9. Collaborative Planning Focus Group and Project Website Town Hall Meetings Community Outreach Surveys

  10. Focus Group/Town Hall Meeting – Key Themes • Strong Advocacy and Appreciation for the System • Economic Development through Park Development • Invest in Existing Park System • Open Space Preservation • Trails, Trails, Trails • Financial Strategies to maintain and grow the system

  11. Project Website www.planyourparksov.com/

  12. Website Participation and Key Themes  The website has generated 926+ comments since January

  13. Intercept Surveys • Purpose: Prioritize Importance of Park and Recreation Facilities and Amenities • Administered by Consulting Team and Parks and Recreation Advisory Board • February 7 th – March 16 th , 2020 • Nine dates and times at various locations and events • Total of 404 participants

  14. Intercept Survey Feedback

  15. Online Survey • Administered via Survey Monkey • Developed in partnership with the Town • April 20 – May 3, 2020 • Total of 372 completed surveys • 4,451 residents represented by the 372 completed surveys

  16. On-Line Survey Priorities

  17. Statistically Valid Survey

  18. Statistically-Valid Survey • Only scientific and defensible method to understand community needs • Administered by mail/phone/web • Developed in partnership with the Town • Methodology allows high return rate (25%-35%) • Total of 443 completed surveys, 95% level of confidence with a margin of error of +/- 4.6% (Goal was 375)

  19. Survey Response Location Map

  20. Advocacy

  21. Park and Facility Visitation and Condition

  22. Ninety-five percent (95%) of Oro Valley’s parks and recreation facilities were given a condition rating that exceeded the national benchmark for excellent of 29%.

  23. Program Participation and Quality

  24. The national benchmark for program participation is 33%.

  25. Fair Good Excellent Poor The national benchmark for excellent is 33%.

  26. The national benchmark for too busy/not interested is 32% and for not knowing what is offered is 35%.

  27. Recreation Program and Activity Needs

  28. National Benchmarks • Community special events - 21% • Senior programs and services 16% • Adult fitness programs – 48% • Adult learning classes 14%

  29. Park, Facility and Amenity Needs

  30. National Benchmarks • Walking and biking trails (multi-use paved) 45% • Walking & hiking trails (natural surface) 33% • Open Space Conservation Areas/Trails – 24% • Golf - 9%

  31. Public Support

  32. Community Needs

  33. Needs Analysis Methodology This model evaluates both quantitative and qualitative data. • Quantitative data includes the local demographics, recreation trends, statistically valid survey and the on-line. • Qualitative data includes community input via stakeholder interviews, staff input, intercept surveys, the project website, and planning team observations. • A weighted scoring system is used to determine the priorities for facilities and programs and services • The results of the priority ranking are tabulated into three categories: High Priority , Medium Priority , and Low Priority . 43

  34. Recreation Programs and Services Prioritized Needs Recreation Program/Service Priority Water fitness programs/lap swimming Recreation Program/Service Priority Weightlifting/bodybuilding programs Running events Community special events ‐ ‐ Reservation/rental of picnic shelters Fitness & wellness programs High Adult learning classes After school programs/out of school camps ‐ Senior programs & services Tennis lessons & leagues Art classes Family oriented programs Bicycle lessons & clubs Learn to swim programs Volleyball programs Soccer programs Recreation Program/Service Priority Low Programs for people with special needs Reservation/rental of indoor meeting space Walking/jogging/running/cycling clubs Performing arts programs Archery Golf lessons/clinics Basketball programs Medium Environmental education programs Sand volleyball programs Pickleball lessons/clinics Recreation/competitive swim team Open swim Gymnastics Softball programs Reservation/rental of athletic fields Football programs Baseball programs Lacrosse programs

  35. Next Steps

  36. Next Steps June – October/November • Park Level of Service Standards and Geographical Analysis through Mapping • Recreation Programming Assessment and Operational Funding Analysis • Capital Improvement Plan • Funding and Revenue Strategies for Capital Improvement Plan • Strategic Action Plan Development • Final Master Plan Development

Recommend


More recommend