on locally o minimal structures
play

On locally o-minimal structures Hiroshi Tanaka joint works with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On locally o-minimal structures Hiroshi Tanaka joint works with Tomohiro Kawakami, Kota Takeuchi and Akito Tsuboi Anan National College of Technology RIMS Model Theory Meeting December 1, 2010 RIMS Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of


  1. On locally o-minimal structures Hiroshi Tanaka joint works with Tomohiro Kawakami, Kota Takeuchi and Akito Tsuboi Anan National College of Technology RIMS Model Theory Meeting December 1, 2010 RIMS Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 1 / 28

  2. Outline local o-minimality 1 uniform local o-minimalily and strong local o-minimality 2 local monotonicity 3 local cell decomposition property 4 Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 2 / 28

  3. Intervals and convex sets Let L be a language containing < . Let M = ( M , <, . . . ) be an L -structure expanding a dense linear ordering < . Definition 1.1 A ⊆ M is said to be convex in M if for any a , b ∈ A , we have ( a , b ) ⊆ A . If additionally sup A , inf A ∈ M ∪ {−∞ , ∞} , then A is called an interval in M . Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 3 / 28

  4. Intervals and convex sets Example 1.2 Let Q 1 = ( Q , < ) . ( − 1 , 1) , [ − 1 , 1] , [ − 1 , 1) , ( − 1 , 1] , { 1 } are intervals. √ √ ( ) − 2 , 2 ∩ Q is not an interval but a convex set. Example 1.3 Let Q 2 = ( Q × Q , < ) , where < is the lexicographic ordering. { 0 } × Q is not an interval but a convex set. Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 4 / 28

  5. O-minimal (weakly o-minimal) structures Let M = ( M , <, . . . ) be an L -structure expanding a dense linear ordering < . Definition 1.4 M is said to be o-minimal if any definable subset of M is a finite union of intervals. M is said to be weakly o-minimal if any definable subset of M is a finite union of convex sets. Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 5 / 28

  6. Locally o-minimal structures The notion of local o-minmality and strongly local o-minimality was introduced by C. Toffalori and K. Vozoris. Definition 1.5 M is said to be locally o-minimal if for any a ∈ M and any definable X ⊆ M , there is an open interval I ∋ a such that X ∩ I is a finite union of intervals. Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 6 / 28

  7. Locally o-minimal structures The notion of local o-minmality and strongly local o-minimality was introduced by C. Toffalori and K. Vozoris. Definition 1.5 M is said to be locally o-minimal if for any a ∈ M and any definable X ⊆ M , there is an open interval I ∋ a such that X ∩ I is a finite union of intervals. M is said to be strongly locally o-minimal if for any a ∈ M , there is an open interval I ∋ a such that for any definable X ⊆ M , X ∩ I is a finite union of intervals. Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 6 / 28

  8. Locally o-minimal structures The notion of local o-minmality and strongly local o-minimality was introduced by C. Toffalori and K. Vozoris. Definition 1.5 M is said to be locally o-minimal if for any a ∈ M and any definable X ⊆ M , there is an open interval I ∋ a such that X ∩ I is a finite union of intervals. M is said to be strongly locally o-minimal if for any a ∈ M , there is an open interval I ∋ a such that for any definable X ⊆ M , X ∩ I is a finite union of intervals. M is said to be uniformly locally o-minimal if for any a ∈ M and any formula ϕ ( x , y ) ∈ L , there is an open interval I ∋ a such that ϕ ( M , b ) ∩ I is a finite union of intervals for any b ∈ M . Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 6 / 28

  9. Examples A typical example of locally o-minimal structures is the following structure. Example 1.6 (Marker and Steinhorn) R = ( R , <, + , sin( x )) is strongly locally o-minimal. Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 7 / 28

  10. Facts In locally o-minimal structures, the following are known. Proposition 1.7 (Toffalori and Vozoris) Any weakly o-minimal structure is locally o-minimal. Proposition 1.8 (Toffalori and Vozoris) Local o-minimality is preserved under elementary equivalence. Remark 1.9 (Toffalori and Vozoris) Strong local o-minimality is not preserved under elementary equivalence. Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 8 / 28

  11. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures Proposition 2.1 (Kawakami, Takeuchi, Tsuboi, and T.) Let M be a uniformly locally o-minimal structure. Suppose that M is ω -saturated. Then, M is strongly locally o-minimal. Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 9 / 28

  12. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures Proposition 2.1 (Kawakami, Takeuchi, Tsuboi, and T.) Let M be a uniformly locally o-minimal structure. Suppose that M is ω -saturated. Then, M is strongly locally o-minimal. Proof. Let a ∈ M and ϕ ( x , y ) ∈ L . By the uniformity of M , there is an open interval I ∋ a such that for any b ∈ M , we can take n b ∈ N so that ϕ ( M , b ) ∩ I is a union of n b many intervals. By the saturation of M , the set { n b : b ∈ M } is uniformly bounded, denoted by n ϕ ∈ N . Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 9 / 28 �

  13. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures Proof. Let θ ϕ ( u , v ) ≡ for any z ∈ M , the set { x ∈ ( u , v ) : M | = ϕ ( x , z ) } is a union of at most n ϕ many intervals. Let Γ ( u , v ) ≡ { u < a < v } ∪ { θ ϕ ( u , v ) : ϕ ∈ L } . Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 10 / 28

  14. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures Proof. Let θ ϕ ( u , v ) ≡ for any z ∈ M , the set { x ∈ ( u , v ) : M | = ϕ ( x , z ) } is a union of at most n ϕ many intervals. Let Γ ( u , v ) ≡ { u < a < v } ∪ { θ ϕ ( u , v ) : ϕ ∈ L } . By compactness, Γ ( u , v ) is consistent. By the saturation of M , there are c , d ∈ M such that M | = Γ ( c , d ) . The open interval ( c , d ) witnesses to the strong local o-minimality of M . � Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 10 / 28

  15. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures We show that there is an ω -saturated locally o-minimal structure that is not uniformly locally o-minimal. Example 2.2 Let L = { <, P q } q ∈ Q + and M : = ( Q , <, P q ) q ∈ Q + . √ Here, P q ( a , b ) ⇐ ⇒ a + 2 · q ≤ b in R . Let M ∗ ≻ M be ω -saturated. Then, M ∗ is locally o-minimal but not uniformly locally o-minimal. For example, when a = 1 , q = 2 , Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 11 / 28

  16. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures Example 2.3 Let L = { <, P q } q ∈ Q + and M : = ( Q , <, P q ) q ∈ Q + . √ Here, P q ( a , b ) ⇐ ⇒ a + 2 · q ≤ b in R . Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 12 / 28

  17. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures Example 2.3 Let L = { <, P q } q ∈ Q + and M : = ( Q , <, P q ) q ∈ Q + . √ Here, P q ( a , b ) ⇐ ⇒ a + 2 · q ≤ b in R . Proof. Th( M ) admits elimination of quantifiers. So, M is weakly o-minimal and hence locally o-minimal. � Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 12 / 28

  18. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures Proof. However, M is not uniformly locally o-minimal. ∵ ) For any open interval I = ( b , c ) ∋ 0 , we have P 1 ( b , M ) ∧ P 1 ( c , M ) � ∅ . Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 13 / 28

  19. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures Proof. However, M is not uniformly locally o-minimal. ∵ ) For any open interval I = ( b , c ) ∋ 0 , we have P 1 ( b , M ) ∧ P 1 ( c , M ) � ∅ . We take u ∈ M such that P 1 ( b , u ) ∧ P 1 ( c , u ) . Then, the set P 1 ( M , u ) divedes into two convexes C 1 and C 2 . Neither C 1 nor C 2 are intervals. � Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 13 / 28

  20. Uniformly locally o-minimal structures Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 14 / 28

  21. Local monotonicity Definition 3.1 A local o-minimal strucuture M = ( M , <, . . . ) have local monotonicity if for any definable X ⊆ M , any definable f : X → M and any a ∈ M there are an open interval I ∋ a and intervals X 0 , X 1 , . . . , X n such that any f | X i is constant, strictly increasing, or strictly decreasing. If additionally any f | X i is continuous, we have local monotonicity with continuity. Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 15 / 28

  22. Local monotonicity In general, locally o-minimal structures do not have local monotonicity. However, the following holds. Fact 1 (Toffalori and Vozoris) Any strongly locally o-minimal structure satisfies local monotonicity. Hiroshi Tanaka (Anan National College of Technology) Locally o-minimal structures December 1, 2010 16 / 28

Recommend


More recommend