norm attaining operators of finite rank
play

Norm attaining operators of finite rank (joint work with Vladimir - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Norm attaining operators of finite rank (joint work with Vladimir Kadets, Gins Lpez, Miguel Martn) Dirk Werner Freie Universitt Berlin Madrid, 9.9.2019 Basic definitions and results , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite


  1. Norm attaining operators of finite rank (joint work with Vladimir Kadets, Ginés López, Miguel Martín) Dirk Werner Freie Universität Berlin Madrid, 9.9.2019

  2. Basic definitions and results , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 2/10

  3. Basic definitions and results • x ∗ ∈ X ∗ is norm attaining ( x ∗ ∈ NA ( X ) ): � x 0 � = 1 , x ∗ ( x 0 ) = sup { x ∗ ( x ): � x � ≤ 1 } = � x ∗ � . ∃ x 0 : , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 2/10

  4. Basic definitions and results • x ∗ ∈ X ∗ is norm attaining ( x ∗ ∈ NA ( X ) ): � x 0 � = 1 , x ∗ ( x 0 ) = sup { x ∗ ( x ): � x � ≤ 1 } = � x ∗ � . ∃ x 0 : • NA ( X ) � = ∅ by the Hahn-Banach theorem. , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 2/10

  5. Basic definitions and results • x ∗ ∈ X ∗ is norm attaining ( x ∗ ∈ NA ( X ) ): � x 0 � = 1 , x ∗ ( x 0 ) = sup { x ∗ ( x ): � x � ≤ 1 } = � x ∗ � . ∃ x 0 : • NA ( X ) � = ∅ by the Hahn-Banach theorem. • James: NA ( X ) = X ∗ ⇐⇒ X reflexive. , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 2/10

  6. Basic definitions and results • x ∗ ∈ X ∗ is norm attaining ( x ∗ ∈ NA ( X ) ): � x 0 � = 1 , x ∗ ( x 0 ) = sup { x ∗ ( x ): � x � ≤ 1 } = � x ∗ � . ∃ x 0 : • NA ( X ) � = ∅ by the Hahn-Banach theorem. • James: NA ( X ) = X ∗ ⇐⇒ X reflexive. • Bishop-Phelps(-Bollobás): NA ( X ) is always dense; more precisely: � x � = � x ∗ � = 1 , x ∗ ( x ) ≥ 1 − ϵ ⇒ � � ϵ, � x ∗ − x ∗ ∃ x 0 , x ∗ � x 0 � = � x ∗ 0 � = x ∗ 0 ( x 0 ) = 1 , � x − x 0 � ≤ 2 0 � ≤ 2 0 : ϵ. , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 2/10

  7. Basic definitions and results • x ∗ ∈ X ∗ is norm attaining ( x ∗ ∈ NA ( X ) ): � x 0 � = 1 , x ∗ ( x 0 ) = sup { x ∗ ( x ): � x � ≤ 1 } = � x ∗ � . ∃ x 0 : • NA ( X ) � = ∅ by the Hahn-Banach theorem. • James: NA ( X ) = X ∗ ⇐⇒ X reflexive. • Bishop-Phelps(-Bollobás): NA ( X ) is always dense; more precisely: � x � = � x ∗ � = 1 , x ∗ ( x ) ≥ 1 − ϵ ⇒ � � ϵ, � x ∗ − x ∗ ∃ x 0 , x ∗ � x 0 � = � x ∗ 0 � = x ∗ 0 ( x 0 ) = 1 , � x − x 0 � ≤ 2 0 � ≤ 2 0 : ϵ. • Example: NA ( c 0 ) = c 00 = all ℓ 1 -sequences of finite support. , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 2/10

  8. On operators which attain their norm , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 3/10

  9. On operators which attain their norm A linear operator T : X → Y is norm attaining ( T ∈ NA ( X, Y ) ): ∃ x 0 : � x 0 � = 1 , � Tx 0 � = sup { � Tx � : � x � ≤ 1 } = � T � . , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 3/10

  10. On operators which attain their norm A linear operator T : X → Y is norm attaining ( T ∈ NA ( X, Y ) ): ∃ x 0 : � x 0 � = 1 , � Tx 0 � = sup { � Tx � : � x � ≤ 1 } = � T � . Lindenstrauss 1963: • X reflexive ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 3/10

  11. On operators which attain their norm A linear operator T : X → Y is norm attaining ( T ∈ NA ( X, Y ) ): ∃ x 0 : � x 0 � = 1 , � Tx 0 � = sup { � Tx � : � x � ≤ 1 } = � T � . Lindenstrauss 1963: • X reflexive ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . • c 0 ⊂ Y ⊂ ℓ ∞ ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 3/10

  12. On operators which attain their norm A linear operator T : X → Y is norm attaining ( T ∈ NA ( X, Y ) ): ∃ x 0 : � x 0 � = 1 , � Tx 0 � = sup { � Tx � : � x � ≤ 1 } = � T � . Lindenstrauss 1963: • X reflexive ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . • c 0 ⊂ Y ⊂ ℓ ∞ ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . • There are X and Y such that NA ( X, Y ) is not dense in L ( X, Y ) . , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 3/10

  13. On operators which attain their norm A linear operator T : X → Y is norm attaining ( T ∈ NA ( X, Y ) ): ∃ x 0 : � x 0 � = 1 , � Tx 0 � = sup { � Tx � : � x � ≤ 1 } = � T � . Lindenstrauss 1963: • X reflexive ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . • c 0 ⊂ Y ⊂ ℓ ∞ ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . • There are X and Y such that NA ( X, Y ) is not dense in L ( X, Y ) . Bourgain 1977: • X RNP ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 3/10

  14. On operators which attain their norm A linear operator T : X → Y is norm attaining ( T ∈ NA ( X, Y ) ): ∃ x 0 : � x 0 � = 1 , � Tx 0 � = sup { � Tx � : � x � ≤ 1 } = � T � . Lindenstrauss 1963: • X reflexive ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . • c 0 ⊂ Y ⊂ ℓ ∞ ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . • There are X and Y such that NA ( X, Y ) is not dense in L ( X, Y ) . Bourgain 1977: • X RNP ⇒ NA ( X, Y ) is always dense in L ( X, Y ) . Gowers 1990: • NA ( X, ℓ 2 ) is not always dense in L ( X, ℓ 2 ) . , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 3/10

  15. Rank 2 operators into ℓ 2 2 , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 4/10

  16. Rank 2 operators into ℓ 2 2 Question • Is NA ( X, ℓ 2 ) always nontrivially nonempty? , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 4/10

  17. Rank 2 operators into ℓ 2 2 Question • Is NA ( X, ℓ 2 ) always nontrivially nonempty? • Is NA ( X, ℓ 2 2 ) always nontrivially nonempty? , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 4/10

  18. Rank 2 operators into ℓ 2 2 Question • Is NA ( X, ℓ 2 ) always nontrivially nonempty? • Is NA ( X, ℓ 2 2 ) always nontrivially nonempty? That is, is NA ( 2 ) ( X, ℓ 2 2 ) := { T ∈ NA ( X, ℓ 2 2 ): rank ( T ) = 2 } � = ∅ ? , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 4/10

  19. Rank 2 operators into ℓ 2 2 Question • Is NA ( X, ℓ 2 ) always nontrivially nonempty? • Is NA ( X, ℓ 2 2 ) always nontrivially nonempty? That is, is NA ( 2 ) ( X, ℓ 2 2 ) := { T ∈ NA ( X, ℓ 2 2 ): rank ( T ) = 2 } � = ∅ ? Examples: • X = C ( K ) , Tx = ( x ( t 1 ) , x ( t 2 )) : � � T � = � T ( 1 ) � = 2 , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 4/10

  20. Rank 2 operators into ℓ 2 2 Question • Is NA ( X, ℓ 2 ) always nontrivially nonempty? • Is NA ( X, ℓ 2 2 ) always nontrivially nonempty? That is, is NA ( 2 ) ( X, ℓ 2 2 ) := { T ∈ NA ( X, ℓ 2 2 ): rank ( T ) = 2 } � = ∅ ? Examples: • X = C ( K ) , Tx = ( x ( t 1 ) , x ( t 2 )) : � � T � = � T ( 1 ) � = 2 � 1 / 2 � 1 • X = L 1 [ 0 , 1 ] , Tx = ( x ( t ) dt, 1 / 2 x ( t ) dt ) : 0 � � T � = � T ( 1 ) � = 1 / 2 , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 4/10

  21. Mates , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 5/10

  22. Mates Let T : X → ℓ 2 2 of rank 2. , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 5/10

  23. Mates Let T : X → ℓ 2 2 of rank 2. Write Tx = ( f ( x ) , g ( x )) . , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 5/10

  24. Mates Let T : X → ℓ 2 2 of rank 2. Write Tx = ( f ( x ) , g ( x )) . Suppose � f � = 1. , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 5/10

  25. Mates Let T : X → ℓ 2 2 of rank 2. Write Tx = ( f ( x ) , g ( x )) . Suppose � f � = 1. Lemma 1 + t 2 for all t ∈ R . � � T � ≤ 1 ⇐⇒ � f + tg � ≤ , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 5/10

  26. Mates Let T : X → ℓ 2 2 of rank 2. Write Tx = ( f ( x ) , g ( x )) . Suppose � f � = 1. Lemma 1 + t 2 for all t ∈ R . � � T � ≤ 1 ⇐⇒ � f + tg � ≤ In this case g is called a mate of f . , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 5/10

  27. Mates Let T : X → ℓ 2 2 of rank 2. Write Tx = ( f ( x ) , g ( x )) . Suppose � f � = 1. Lemma 1 + t 2 for all t ∈ R . � � T � ≤ 1 ⇐⇒ � f + tg � ≤ In this case g is called a mate of f . Proposition Let � f � = 1. (a) If, for some 0 � = h ∈ B X ∗ , � f + th � − 1 < ∞ , limsup t 2 t → 0 then f has a mate (namely sh for some s ∈ ( 0 , 1 ] ). , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 5/10

  28. Mates Let T : X → ℓ 2 2 of rank 2. Write Tx = ( f ( x ) , g ( x )) . Suppose � f � = 1. Lemma 1 + t 2 for all t ∈ R . � � T � ≤ 1 ⇐⇒ � f + tg � ≤ In this case g is called a mate of f . Proposition Let � f � = 1. (a) If, for some 0 � = h ∈ B X ∗ , � f + th � − 1 < ∞ , limsup t 2 t → 0 then f has a mate (namely sh for some s ∈ ( 0 , 1 ] ). (b) If f is not an extreme point of the unit ball, then it has a mate. , Dirk Werner, Norm attaining operators of finite rank, 9.9.2019 5/10

Recommend


More recommend