national wash multi stakeholder forum 9 hilton hotel june
play

National WASH Multi-Stakeholder Forum 9 Hilton Hotel, June 12-13, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

National WASH Multi-Stakeholder Forum 9 Hilton Hotel, June 12-13, 2018 Resourcing and Increasing Commitment for the One WASH and WRM Programmes H.E Dr. Eng. Seleshi Bekele Minister for Water, Irrigation Electricity Presentation Outline


  1. National WASH Multi-Stakeholder Forum 9 Hilton Hotel, June 12-13, 2018 “Resourcing and Increasing Commitment for the One WASH and WRM Programmes” H.E Dr. Eng. Seleshi Bekele Minister for Water, Irrigation Electricity

  2. Presentation Outline 1. Water Resources- Global and National context 2. The SDGs 3. Ethiopia’s GTP and WaSH and Progresses 4. Financing Partnership and Integration 5. Focus on the MSF – 9 Discussions MSF 9

  3. 1. The WASH- (con’d) ▪ MDG target met by providing for 2.6 billion people ▪ 424 million people from Sub- Saharan Africa had access to improved water source ▪ During the MDG period, in Sub- Saharan Africa the access coverage increased on Average from 33% to 52% (19% point increase).

  4. 1. The WASH- MDG Progress • During the MDG Ethiopian Water Supply access coverage increased from 14% to 57% (43% point increase)

  5. 2. The SDG’s Elements Underpinning the SDG The Goals next 15 years in 5 areas: People, ple, Planet, et, Prosperi sperity, ty, Peace ce & & Partnershi tnership. p.

  6. 17 Univ iversal Goals ls

  7. The SDGs: : Network of targets DESA SA Working pap paper r #1 #141

  8. High Relevance to Water & other SDGs

  9. High Relevance to Water & other SDGs

  10. SDG Goal 6: ensure availability & sustainable management of water and sanitation for all Baseline 5.2 billion people used a “safely managed” drinking water service in 2015 2.9 billion people used a “safely managed” sanitation service in 2015 892 million people still practiced open defecation in 2015 More than 2 billion people are affected by water stress MSF 9

  11. 3. Ethiopia’s Water Sector, GTP and WaSH ❑ 12 river basins 123 billion m 3 SW ▪ 36-40 billion m 3 GW ▪ Per Capita Water Avaialibity 7000 6000 Per Capita Water Available (Cu. m) 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050 Year

  12. Rainfall distribution Considerable parts of Ethiopia are rainfall scarce. Not necessarily economically scarce if water resources management & infrastructure improves

  13. Water scarcities: 2000 Physical scarcity : Not enough water . ▪ Economic Scarcity : No infrastructure to make water available to people & production Little or no water scarcity Physical water scarcity Approaching physical water scarcity Economic water scarcity Not estimated

  14. Ethiopia Vulnerability… Major Water Challenges Competing water use and sustainability Low institutional capacity and high dependency on subsistence agriculture. Weather Extremes (Drought and flood) Daily demand for water will increase throughout all sectors, while, water supplies will become more variable and less predictable. MSF 9

  15. Ethiopia’s Policies and Programmes COUNTRY VISION: Joining middle income countries by 2025 Policies Strategies and Programmes ▪ TG Health Policy GTP 1 and 2 ▪ Education Policy MDG and SDG ▪ Agricultural and Rural Dev’t Water Sector Development Strategy Policy PASDEP ▪ Urban Development Policy Universal Access Plan ▪ WRM Policy Urban Waste Water Management Str. ▪ Livestock and Fishery Policy WASH Implementation Framework ▪ Finance and Economic One WASH National Programme Cooperation Policy Programme Operation Manual

  16. Coordination in the WASH sector has been evolving rapidly Towards Random supply driven project based approach Panned supply driven project based approach Planned demand driven Program approach Planned harmonized sector wide approach Single Integrated One WaSH National Program

  17. GTP-II The plan provid vides s act ction on areas for 5 ye years s cy cycl cle • Rural water supply ❖ 25l/c/d ❖ Coverage: 59% ➔ 85% ❖ 20% piped • Urban water supply ❖ 100l/c/d(stagel 1), 80l/c/d (stage 2), 60l/c/d (stage 3), 50l/c/d (stage 4), 40l/c/d (stage 5) ❖ Coverage 57% ➔ 75% ❖ All piped • urban waste water ❖ study for 36 towns of stage 1,2,3 ❖ Construction of facility for 6 towns having 200,000 and more population • Reduce none functionality of RWS from 11.2% to 7% • None revenue Urban water from 39% to 20% ፤

  18. Rural Water Water Supply LSMS- Water Quality Testing Assessment results in Ethiopia; ▪ SDG baseline for access to safely managed drinking water is 5%. ▪ The SDG baseline for a basic service is 26%.

  19. Urban Water Supply ▪ SDG baseline for access to safely managed drinking water is 38%. ▪ The SDG baseline for a basic service is 73%.

  20. GTP-II Status Baseline 2010 10 th by coverage 2008 Coverag 20 Coverage end of Month E.C. 09 E.C 2007 E.C. 59 63.1 68.5 70.7 Rural 51 52.5 54.7 58.9 Urban 58 61.0 65.7 68.3 Total

  21. New Flagship Program CLIMATE RESILIENT, CR-WASH Overall Objective 1. Climate Resilient WaSH: providing adequate, safe, resilient and sustainable WaSH services to the people in arid and semi- arid areas of Ethiopia 2. Satisfying water supply >60% arid and semi-arid areas requirements for livestock, agro- industries and other users

  22. CR-WaSH: Conceptual Framework Intervention steps to be Reliable source of water (GW • involved and SW water) Adequate water access for • DTM, RS & GIS domestic and livestock Based Analysis Climate Resilient WaSH (CR- • Platform Capacity Water Sources, WaSH) development Quality Development Settlement, for Operation Application and deployment of • and Administration Maintenance information modern technologies Resilient Water – Remote sensing, GIS,MIS, etc Supply Build relevant capacity in the • Planning regions Resources and Mobilization Design Integration and partnership • Construction of Infrastructure

  23. Impact of WaSH + WRM … Theory of Change Outputs Outcomes Impact Intervention ▪ Improve health & well- being of the pop Decrease Improve WaSH ▪ Increase eco. opo disease, service delivery ▪ Maximize inclusion Outcome 1: burden ▪ Enhance education and Improved Improve and WaSH service benefit institutions and coverage and poverty ▪ Creation of alternative well-being accountability, and provide ▪ Enabling environment capacity support ▪ building capacity to decentralized ▪ Sustainability of service levels of local Outcome Increase ▪ Community cohesion governments 2: poverty well- reduced being ▪ Social cooperation and Involve all and partnerships stakeholders ▪ economi Welfare and socialization c growth MSF 9

  24. 4. Financing Partnership and Integration • Strengthening domestic resource mobilization, through international support to improve domestic capacity for tax and other revenue collection. • Promoting a combination of public, private and household financing to the sector. • Adopting and implementing investment promotion to attract the private sector. • Attaining long-term debt sustainability through coordinated policies. • Encouraging innovative financing mechanism to the high demand. MSF 9

  25. 4. FPI (cont’d) Revitalize the framework of partnership, complemented by multi-stakeholder partnerships that mobilize and share knowledge, expertise, technology and finance. Ensure that there is a coherent, coordinated & all-inclusive participatory approach to effective localization, implementation & coordination. MSF 9

  26. 4. FPI (cont’d) • Putting in place sound & robust Monitoring Framework & Implementation Guide that will address the needs of all stakeholders • Creating and nurturing vibrant partnerships to achieve GTP and SDG targets. • Promoting social accountability to empower local-level community for improved service delivery and democratic governance. • Taking urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts • Ensuring shared and collective responsibilities and accountabilities at all levels MSF 9

  27. 5. Focus for the MSF - 9 ……Call for Actions Research and Knowledge Mgt: Documenting lessons learned both in WaSH and WRM . Finance: ‘Resourcing the Sector’ and utilizing available budget. Integration: ‘Sector and Institutional Partnership Coordination’ . Technology: ‘Cutting -edge Technology Options’ to combat CC effect. MSF 9

  28. 5. Focus for the MSF -9 …… Call for Actions Enabling Environment: ‘ Institutional & System Capacity Dev’t Robust M & E: ‘T racking mechanism’ for agreed undertakings. Accountability: B eyond forum consensus; ‘Shared & Collective Responsibilities’ to deliver commitments. MSF 9

  29. Thank You

Recommend


More recommend