national assessment program
play

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM: LITERACY AND NUMERACY (NAPLAN) DATA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM: LITERACY AND NUMERACY (NAPLAN) DATA ANALYSIS 2018 CHURCHLANDS PRIMARY SCHOOL SCHOOL BOARD PRESENTATION Numeracy Data Analysis Cohort performed above Like schools in Numeracy. Year 3 has progressed


  1. NATIONAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM: LITERACY AND NUMERACY (NAPLAN) DATA ANALYSIS 2018 CHURCHLANDS PRIMARY SCHOOL SCHOOL BOARD PRESENTATION

  2. Numeracy Data Analysis • Cohort performed above Like schools in Numeracy. • Year 3 has progressed moving from Expected to Above Expected performance. • Year 5 has continued in the Above Expected range of performance however have shown a declining trend in performance since 2015. Business Plan: Numeracy Targets ฀ Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like Schools in Years 3 and 5 in NAPLAN ฀ Maintain the percentage of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above WA like Schools . 2017-18 Year 3 – 61%-77% Not in Year 5 71%-67% ฀ The stable cohort demonstrates high progress / high achievement 2018-2020 on the Schools Online progress versus achievement quadrant for 2016-2018

  3. ฀ The stable cohort demonstrates high progress / high achievement 2018-2020 on the Schools Online progress versus achievement quadrant for 2016-2018

  4. Maintain the percentage of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above WA like Schools . 2017-18 Year 3 – 61%-77% Not in Year 5 71%-67%

  5. ฀ Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like Schools in Years 3 and 5 in NAPLAN

  6. Reading Data Analysis  Year 3 cohort performed above Like schools in reading.  Year 3 has shown progress over the last 2 years moving close to Above Expected performance.  Year 5 has made significant progress – progressing from Below expected in Year 3 to close to above expected in Year 5 Business Plan: Reading Targets ฀ Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like Schools in Years 3 and 5 in NAPLAN ฀ Maintain the percentage of students in the top two EARS proficiency bands at or above 70%. Year 3 ONLY ฀ Stable cohort performance to match or exceed WA like Schools data in First Cut ‘high’ and ‘very high’ progress between Years 3-5. ฀ EAL/D student performance to match or exceed WA like Schools First Cut data in Years 3 and 5.

  7. ฀ Maintain the percentage of students in the top two EARS proficiency bands at or above 70%. Year 3 ONLY

  8. ฀ Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like Schools in Years 3 and 5 in NAPLAN

  9. ฀ Stable cohort performance to match or exceed WA like Schools data in First Cut ‘high’ and ‘very high’ progress between Years 3-5.

  10. ฀ EAL/D student performance to match or exceed WA like Schools First Cut data in Years 3 and 5 Year 3 only .

  11. Writing Data Analysis  Year 3 cohort performed above like schools in writing  Year 3 and 5 cohort sitting in the expected range for performance  Year 5 cohort has made significant progress between Year 3- 5, moving from below the expected performance to at expected performance  Trend line is progressing downward, due to poor performance 2 years prior Business Plan: Writing Targets  Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like Schools in Years 3 and 5 in NAPLAN  Relative Assessment will show the school has arrested the downward trend in NAPLAN writing.  The First Cut ‘high’ and ‘very high’ progress of boys between Years 3 -5 matches or exceeds that of WA like schools.  The number of students making low and very low progress to reduce to below WA like schools in the First Cut data between Years 3 and 5

  12.  Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like Schools in Years 3 and 5 in NAPLAN

  13.  The number of students making low and very low progress to reduce to below WA like schools in the First Cut data between Years 3 and 5  The First Cut ‘high’ and ‘very high’ progress of boys between Years 3 -5 matches or exceeds that of WA like schools in ‘very high’ only .

  14. Spelling Data Analysis  Year 3 and 5 cohort achievement in the expected range, closer to the above expected range  Year 3 and 5 performed high than like schools  Year 5 cohort has higher achievement but low progress between years 3-5 Grammar and Punctuation Data Analysis  Year 3 cohort performed significantly above like school and achieved in the above expected mean  Year 5 has shown progress over the last 2 years moving close to Above Expected performance.

Recommend


More recommend