Motor Vehicle Traffic Safety Topic Call MVTS Topic Call: Technical - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Topic Call #5 September 24, 2019 Motor Vehicle Traffic Safety Topic Call

MVTS Topic Call: Technical Tips Download resources in the Call (866) 835-7973 to File Share pod (above the listen and be heard slides) Mute yourself when you’re This session is being not talking (use phone’s recorded mute button or press *#) Use the chat (bottom left) Use the hand raise button to ask questions at any to be called on or time participate in a verbal poll * This call is subject to the CSLC Data Sharing Agreement. 2

Motor Vehicle Traffic Safety Topic Call Team Motor Vehicle Traffic Safety • Nebraska Topic Lead Technical Producer • Oklahoma Jenny Stern-Carusone Jim Vetter • Texas • Washington • Wisconsin • Wyoming Technical Back-Up Improvement Advisor Maria Katradis Jennifer Leonardo 3

Agenda • Welcome • Learning Collaborative • State Updates • Storyboards • (Virtual) Learning Session 2 • Upcoming Deadlines

The CSLC • Share your progress and learn from others • Ask questions, get answers Topic Calls • Expand your knowledge of state-level interventions Training & Technical Assistance • One-on-one calls/emails with topic lead and/or additional topic experts • Help with national data sets Monthly Reports • Help with coding • Provide progress (quantitative and/or qualitative) • Create a time capsule of the progress you’ve made that you can access and reflect on • Create charts for your data • Add to the collaborative effort of the team 5

All Teach/All Learn Questions for Peers Quality Successes to Improvement Share Questions All Teac ach All ll Learn 6

Share State Updates 7

State Updates • Texas • Washington • Wyoming 8

MVTS Change Package Strategi egies es Me Measu sures Number of fitting stations, birthing hospitals, 1. Impl plement and nd spr pread c child pa passenger safety educ ucation t to and other organizations offering child par aren ents/c /car aregivers ( (e. e.g. g., h how w to correctly i instal all child s saf afety s seat eats, buckle e passenger safety education to harness, et , etc.) parents/caregivers 2. Establish h child passenger r inspection a and fitting s stations througho hout Number of inspection and fitting stations th the sta tate o or r jurisdict ction established 3. Train and certify fy child passenger s r safety techn hnicians in counties Number of child passenger safety throughout t the state o or jur urisdiction technicians trained and certified 4. . Distribute c child safety s y seats a and boos ooster s seats t throughou out the s state or or Number of organizations distributing child ju juris isdic iction safety seats and booster seats Number of schools and organizations 5. . Im Impleme ment and spread e evidence-based ed t teen d driver safet ety p y progr grams ms to conducting teen driver safety programs with teens throu oughout the state or or jurisdiction on ( (e.g .g., C ., Checkpoints, Im Impact Teen teens Driver, Teens In In the D Driver S Seat) Number of schools and organizations 6. . Im Impleme ment and spread e evidence-based ed t teen d driver safet ety p y progr grams ms to conducting teen driver safety programs with parents/caregivers throughou out t the state or or jurisdiction on (e.g .g. . Checkpoints) parents/caregivers Number of Parents Are the Key parent-teen 7. Impl plement a and nd s spr pread t the us use o of t the Ce Cent nters for Di Disease Co Cont ntrol and nd driver agreements signed Prevention on’s Parents A Are the K Key y parent-teen d driving agreeme ment 9

Share Storyboards 10

Oklahoma Child Safety Learning Collaborative Motor Vehicle Traffic Safety Teen D Driv iver Sa Safety

Oklahoma Storyboard: Rationale • Pr Problem em S Stat atement ent: After the first year of life, more children die from injuries than all other causes of death combined. In Oklahoma, injuries account for 57% of all deaths to children 1-14 years of age and 82% of all deaths among adolescents 15-19 years of age. Injury Prevention Service, OSDH • AIM IM: By April 2020, Oklahoma will decrease motor vehicle traffic safety related deaths and hospitalizations by 2% for children and adolescents ages 0 through 19.

Oklahoma Storyboard: Approach Motor V or Vehicle le S Safety T y Team P Profile le: • Alic licia L a Lin incoln, Program Manager, Child & Adolescent Health, OSDH • Beth th Wash shington, n, Supervisor, Safe Kids Tulsa • Brittany Mat Mathenia, Healthy Youth Consultant, Child & Adolescent Health, OSDH • David id B Bal ales, Environmental Health Officer, Indian Health Services • Den Dena Tr Trosky, Oklahoma SAFE Coordinator, DCCCA, Inc. • Joyce Mar Marshal all, Director, Maternal and Child Health, OSDH • Kat atie ie Mu Muell ller, Chief of Programs, Law Enforcement Programs Administrator, OHSO • Kim Gr m Gray, Director, Safe Kids Oklahoma • Lisa a Rhoad ades, Program Manager, Oklahoma Child Death Review Board, OCCY • Lorry Gai ail Malc Malcom, Childhood Injury Prevention Coordinator, Injury Prevention, OSDH • Peggy eggy Byerly, Early Childhood Coordinator, Child & Adolescent Health, OSDH • Tracy W y Wendlin ing, Director, Injury Prevention, OSDH

Oklahoma Storyboard: Approach • Environmental scan of active Teen Driver Safety education programs across state • Utilized crash data • Identified gaps: o Data o Utilization of evidence-based programs o Resources

Oklahoma Storyboard: Lessons Learned • There are more teen driver safety programs in rural areas • There is a lack of consistency in what data is tracked, making it difficult to compare programs • The majority of programs go where they are invited rather than focus on areas of high need • They are limited by a lack of adequate funding 15

Oklahoma Storyboard: Demonstrating part of problem Source: https://okdpswf.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/2b89698a6b341ab9e2adf1b2086c600 16

Oklahoma: Impact Story • Ide dentified t top op f five c cou ounties f for or t teen dr driving c crash sh rates: s: o Adair o Cherokee o Cleveland o Harmon o Payne • United partners’ efforts around teen driving safety, with a special focus on these counties Source: https://okdpswf.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/2b289698a6b341ab9e2adf1b2086c600

Oklahoma: Impact Story Our r Par artn tners in in Evid vidence-Based sed Teen een D Driver S er Safet ety P Progr grams: s: • Educati tion onal A Alternati tives s – Okl klah ahoma C a Chal allen enge • Saf Safe e Kid ids O Okl klah ahoma: C Countdown2Drive • Seatb tbelts Ar Are For or Ev Everyone ( (SAFE) AFE) • Teens i in the the D Driver S Seat ( t (sp spon onsored by Sta tate Farm) 18

Oklahoma: Next Steps • Stakeholder identification in target counties • Develop resources and trainings o Three projects in target counties • Poster presentations and demonstrations of evidence-based programming to potential partners • Video conference with partners to provide support (train-the-trainer)

Oklahoma: Next Steps Work t toward N New 90 90 Day Aim Aim St Stat atement: • Implement a minimum of three evidence-based teen driver safety programs in the top five counties • Track consistent data for each evidence-based program implemented Aspir iratio ions ns b beyond nd t the CSLC: C: Maintain our collaborative partnerships and increase the evidence-based teen driver safety programs being implemented across the state. 20

Nebraska Teen Driver Safety Team Partners Sim (with granddaughter), Jeanne (middle), Celeste (walking with dog with baby on board) and Carol (retired, not pictured) 21

Aim By April 2023, reduce youth-involved fatal A and B crashes by 9.2 percent from 1,340 (2013-2017 moving average) to 1,217 for adolescents ages 15-19 (NDOT Highway Safety Office data), through implementation and spread of the Teens in the Driver Seat program in tandem with other evidence-based programming. • Goal • By October 31, 2019, we will increase by 5 schools from the current 35 schools using Teens in the Driver Seat for the 2019- 2020 school year of which 3 will be in priority counties identified by NOHS crash data. 22

Project Approach • PDSA around the “Ways to Communicate” as presented at the CSLC Learning Session *General Publications (share information) Face-to-face (shape behavior) • Used the PDSA cycle to see if face-to-face communication with local partners would lend itself to a higher probability they would work with schools to implement TDS compared to current communication using email and networking. • Prediction: YES • Partners: NDOT Highway Safety Office, Lexington PD, Omaha PD, AAA Nebraska, National Safety Council-Omaha, Nebraska State Patrol, CODES Epi., Maternal and Child Health School Nurse, Drive Smart NE Coalition CSLC Power Point Day 1: 2001, Sarah W. Fraser 23