mixing and decays of the antidecuplet in the context of
play

Mixing and decays of the antidecuplet in the context of approximate - PDF document

Mixing and decays of the antidecuplet in the context of approximate SU(3) symmetry Vadim Guzey (Bochum) and M.V. Polyakov (Liege) 1. Motivation 2. Antidecuplet mixed with three octets: General expressions for 10 partial decay widths 3. Emerging


  1. Mixing and decays of the antidecuplet in the context of approximate SU(3) symmetry Vadim Guzey (Bochum) and M.V. Polyakov (Liege) 1. Motivation 2. Antidecuplet mixed with three octets: General expressions for 10 partial decay widths 3. Emerging picture of N 10 and Σ 10 decays 4. Discussion (influence of the mixing with 27-plet, ideal mixing) and conclusions Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

  2. Motivation • Approximate flavor SU(3) symmetry of strong interactions allows to group all hadrons into certain multiplets. Only singlets, octets ( 8 ) and decuplets ( 10 ) were believed to be realized in Nature. The discoveries of the Θ + and Ξ −− , if confirmed, mean the existence of a new physical multiplet: the antidecuplet ( 10 ). • Approximate SU(3) symmetry works surprisingly well: Mass splittings and partial decay widths of all baryon multiplets (singlets, octets, decuplets) are described and predicted with good accuracy: Gell-Mann and Ne’eman 1964; Kokkedee 1969; Samios, Goldberg, Meadows 1974 . • Approximate SU(3) suits best for establishing in a model- independent way the overall structure of a given SU(3) multiplet: Mass splittings, necessity of mixing with other multiplets due to SU(3) breaking, correlations between partial decay widths. Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

  3. • This is exactly what one needs for the antidecuplet: a reliable overall picture of 10 and its mixing with other multiplets and a way to systemize the present experimental info on the 10 decays. • Since SU(3) is broken, states from different multiplets with the same spin and parity can mix. Because of the small width of Θ + , even small mixing dramatically affects predictions for the 10 decays. At the same time, small mixing with 10 affects very little non-exotic multiplets. This means that one can use the results of SU(3) analysis of the non-exotic multiplets (three octets in our case) in the SU(3) analysis of 10 decays. • After the SU(3) picture of 10 is established using the scarce experimental info on 10 decays, one can make model- independent predictions for unmeasured decays and assess available models of the 10 mixing. Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

  4. Antidecuplet mixing with three octets We consider the scenario that 10 mixes with three J P = 1 / 2 + octets: the ground-state octet, the octet containing N (1440) Λ(1600) , Σ(1660) and Ξ(1690) , the octet containing N (1710) , Λ(1800) , Σ(1880) and Ξ(1950) . The mixing takes place through the N 10 and Σ 10 and the corresponding N and Σ octet states:  | N phys      � 1 0 0 sin θ 1 | N 1 � 1 | N phys � 0 1 0 sin θ 2 | N 2 �       2  =       | N phys 0 0 1 sin θ 3 | N 3 � �       3      | N phys − sin θ 1 − sin θ 2 − sin θ 3 1 | N 10 � � 10 • We assume that θ i mixing angles are small, θ i = O ( ǫ ) , where ǫ is a small parameter of SU(3) breaking. We systematically neglect O ( ǫ 2 ) terms. • The | N 1 � , | N 2 � and | N 3 � states can mix among themselves, i.e. they can belong to several different octets. Using the χ 2 fit to the measured decays, we find that | N 2 � and | N 3 � states are slightly mixed (it is legitimate to neglect 10 at this stage. Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

  5. After this is taken into account, it is sufficient to consider only the mixing of each individual | N phys � with | N phys � . i 10 • The mixing angles θ i and θ Σ i are related, � � � � N phys − N phys = sin θ Σ Σ phys − Σ phys sin θ i , i i i 10 10 which becomes θ i = θ Σ i ignoring O ( ǫ 2 ) terms. • Gell-Mann–Okubo mass formulas, which describe the mass splitting inside SU(3) multiplets, are not sensitive to small mixing � = N i + sin 2 θ i N 10 = N i + O ( ǫ 2 ) , N phys ≡ � N phys | ˆ M | N phys i i i It is not legitimate to estimate the mixing angles from the Gell-Mann–Okubo mass formula. Instead, one has to consider decays which contain both O (1) and O ( ǫ ) terms. • We assume that SU(3) symmetry is violated by non-equal masses inside a given multiplet and mixing and that SU(3) is exact in decay vertices → finite number of universal SU(3) coupling constants. Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

  6. General expressions for 10 couplings: Γ Θ + and G 10 In our analysis, Γ Θ + and Σ π N are external parameters, which are varied in the following intervals: 1 ≤ Γ Θ + ≤ 5 MeV; 45 ≤ Σ π N ≤ 75 MeV. Σ π N determines the θ 1 mixing angle with the ground state octet; Γ Θ + determines the G 10 and H 10 ( H 10 = 2 G 10 − 18 ) coupling constants using Praszalowicz, hep-ph/0402038; R.A. Arndt et al. , PRC 69 (2004) 035208 √ � � 1 5 g Θ+ N K = √ G 10 + sin θ 1 H 10 4 5 10 G 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 Γ Θ + =1 MeV -6 Γ Θ + =3 MeV Γ Θ + =5 MeV -8 -10 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Σ π N , MeV Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

  7. General expressions for N 10 couplings   √ � � 1 5 7 �  , gN 10 N π =  G 10 + sin θ 1 H 10 − G 8 sin θi gNiN π √ √ − 4 2 5 5 i =2 , 3   √ � � 1 5 1 �  , gN 10 N η =  − G 10 + sin θ 1 + sin θi gNiN η H 10 − G 8 √ √ 4 2 5 5 i =2 , 3   1 4 �  , gN 10Λ K =  G 10 + sin θ 1 G 8 + sin θi gNi Λ K √ √ 2 5 5 i =2 , 3   2 � gN 10∆ π =  sin θ 1 G 8 + sin θi gNi ∆ π √  5 i =2 , 3 • The g N i B P coupling constants are determined by the χ 2 fit to the measured decays of the octets; the θ 2 , 3 are left as free parameters. • Important correlation: Mixing with the octets can decrease g N 10 N π and simultaneously increase g N 10 N η . • The N 10 ∆ π decay is possible only due to mixing. • The partial decay widths are found from p | 3 | � M 2 Γ( B 1 → B 2 + P ) = 3 | g B 1 B 2 P | 2 2 π ( M 1 + M 2 ) 2 M 1 Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

  8. Part. decay width Γ (N * → N π ), MeV Γ Θ + =1 MeV, Σ π N =45 MeV Σ π N =75 MeV 35 90 30 80 70 25 60 20 50 15 40 30 10 20 5 10 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 -0.1 -0.1 sin θ 3 -0.1 sin θ sin θ 3 -0.1 sin θ -0.2 -0.2 2 2 -0.2 -0.2 Γ Θ + =5 MeV, Σ π N =45 MeV Σ π N =75 MeV 20 60 17.5 50 15 40 12.5 10 30 7.5 20 5 10 2.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 -0.1 -0.1 sin θ 3 -0.1 sin θ sin θ 3 -0.1 sin θ -0.2 -0.2 2 2 -0.2 -0.2 Part. decay width Γ (N * → N η ), MeV Γ Θ + =1 MeV, Σ π N =45 MeV Σ π N =75 MeV 2.4 5 4.8 2.2 4.6 2 4.4 4.2 1.8 4 1.6 3.8 3.6 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 sin θ 3 sin θ sin θ 3 sin θ -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 2 2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 Γ Θ + =5 MeV, Σ π N =45 MeV Σ π N =75 MeV 5.4 8 5.2 7.75 5 7.5 4.8 7.25 4.6 7 4.4 6.75 4.2 6.5 4 6.25 3.8 6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 sin θ 3 sin θ sin θ 3 sin θ -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 2 2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

  9. Part. decay width Γ (N * → Λ K), MeV Γ Θ + =1 MeV, Σ π N =45 MeV Σ π N =75 MeV 1.6 3 1.4 1.2 2.5 1 2 0.8 0.6 1.5 0.4 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 -0.1 -0.1 sin θ 3 -0.1 sin θ sin θ 3 -0.1 sin θ -0.2 -0.2 2 2 -0.2 -0.2 Γ Θ + =5 MeV, Σ π N =45 MeV Σ π N =75 MeV 4.5 2.5 2.25 4 2 3.5 1.75 3 1.5 1.25 2.5 1 2 0.75 1.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 -0.1 -0.1 sin θ 3 -0.1 sin θ sin θ 3 -0.1 sin θ -0.2 -0.2 2 2 -0.2 -0.2 Part. decay width Γ (N * → ∆π ), MeV Σ π N =45 MeV Σ π N =75 MeV 140 225 120 200 175 100 150 80 125 60 100 75 40 50 20 25 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1 0 0 -0.05 0 -0.05 0 s s i i n -0.1 n -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 sin θ 2 sin θ 2 θ θ -0.15 -0.15 3 3 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

  10. What is presently known about N 10 ? • The PWA analysis of R.A. Arndt et al. , PRC 69 (2004) 035208 gives two candidate states with masses 1680 MeV and 1730 MeV. Both states should have Γ N 10 → N π ≤ 0 . 5 MeV. • GRAAL observes a narrow nucleon resonance near 1670 MeV in the reaction γ n → n η V. Kuznetsov for the GRAAL Collab., hep-ex/0409032 . Interpretation: Γ N 10 → N η should not be too small. • STAR observes a narrow peak at 1734 MeV and only a weak indication of a narrow peak at 1693 MeV in the Λ K S invariant mass S. Kabana for the STAR Collab., hep-ex/0406032 . Interpretation: Γ N 10 → Λ K is possibly suppressed. We find that this picture of N 10 decays can be realized by suitable choice of θ i . In particular, we impose the Γ N 10 → N π ≤ 1 MeV cut and find unsuppressed Γ N 10 → N η and somewhat suppressed Γ N 10 → Λ K . Three Days of Hadronic Physics, 16.12.-18.12.2004, Spa, Belgium V. Guzey

Recommend


More recommend