mic hig a n bypro duc t syne rg y
play

Mic hig a n ByPro duc t Syne rg y Christine V. Spitzle y, AI CP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 06, 2024 •33 likes •303 views

Mic hig a n ByPro duc t Syne rg y Christine V. Spitzle y, AI CP T ri-Co unty Re g io na l Pla nning Co mmissio n T ri-Co unty Re g io na l Pla nning Co mmissio n E st. 1956 L a nsing Clinto n, E a to n, a nd I ng ha m Co

  1. Mic hig a n ByPro duc t Syne rg y Christine V. Spitzle y, AI CP T ri-Co unty Re g io na l Pla nning Co mmissio n

  2. T ri-Co unty Re g io na l Pla nning Co mmissio n –E st. 1956  L a nsing  Clinto n, E a to n, a nd I ng ha m Co untie s  Po p. 450,000  Pro g ra mming T ra nspo rta tio n  E c o no mic De ve lo pme nt  Da ta  E nviro nme nt  L a nd Use 

  3. Christine V. Spitzle y, AI CP  B.S. Urb a n a nd Re g io na l Pla nning  25 ye a rs  E c o no mic De ve lo pme nt  T ra nspo rta tio n  L a nd Use  Air Qua lity  F a ir Ho using  Wa te r

  4. ByPro duc t Syne rg y  T a ke wha t is tra ditio na lly c o nside re d “wa ste ” a nd re purpo se it a s a n input.  Re duc e dispo sa l c o sts  Re duc e ra w ma te ria l c o sts  Pro te c t the e nviro nme nt  Sa ve na tura l re so urc e s  Sa ve mo ne y, inc re a se fina nc ia l via b ility

  5. E Ha rmo ny  Ma rke t to e ntitie s with wa nts/ ne e ds  Pro vide a fo rum fo r e xc ha ng e o f info rma tio n (Cre a te a pro file . Cha ng e a t will.)  Allo w fo r priva te de ve lo pme nt o f re la tio nships (Go o n a s ma ny da te s a s yo u wish)  L e g a l c o nc e rns a re b e twe e n invo lve d e ntitie s (Ma rria g e )  Disso lutio n o f re la tio nships a lso priva te (Divo rc e ) BPS Cha rt

  6. Our Visio n o f a Suc c e ssful BPS  Pa rtic ipa nts will re pre se nt dive rse e ntitie s  Will b e a c c e ssib le to b usine sse s, no npro fits a nd c o mmunitie s  Will b e susta ina b le

  7. So …. Ho w is ByPro duc t Syne rg y diffe re nt fro m the tra ditio na l “Wa ste E xc ha ng e Pro g ra m” ?

  8. ByPro duc t Syne rg y  “Old Sc ho o l” Wa ste E xc ha ng e ransfo rmatio n o f wa ste to ne w input o r  T pro duc t  So c ia l Applic a tio ns  E nviro nme nta l Me tric s  Susta ina b ility

  9. “Old Sc ho o l” Wa ste E xc ha ng e  Still ha s va lue  E xpe rie nc e d pa rtic ipa nts  Wisdo m fro m suc c e sse s a nd c ha lle ng e s  Ca se studie s

  10. T ra nsfo rma tio n o f Wa ste  T hinking a b o ut wa ste in ne w wa ys  E xpe rt “think ta nks” to c o nside r a lte rna tive s  Re de fine “re use ”  E x. T ire s

  11. So c ia l Applic a tio ns  Go o dwill/ Pe c kha m:  Jo b s  T ra ining  Go o ds  E nviro nme nta l Justic e  L a ndfill spa c e  Ra w ma te ria ls  Po llutio n

  12. E nviro nme nta l Me tric s to Qua ntify Be ne fits Re a lize d  L a ndfill Dive rsio n  CO2 Re duc tio n  E ne rg y Sa ving s  Ha za rdo us Wa ste Re duc tio n  Wa te r Use Re duc tio n  Re duc tio n in Virg in Ma te ria l Use

  13. Susta ina b ility  L o w c o st  Dive rse  E vo lving  Ope n fo rum  Disse mina tio n

  14. Sta te wide I nte re st/ Suppo rt  F lint Are a Re inve stme nt Offic e  Supplie rs Pa rtne rship fo r the E nviro nme nt  MDE Q—L a nsing , Gra nd Ra pids, De tro it

  15. Sa mple o f T ho se I nte re ste d in “Ne xt Ste ps”  GMB Co mmunitie s  GM  Wo rking Bug s  Go o dye a r  De mme r  T he Po la r Co mpa nie s  L BWL  CMS E ne rg y  F o rd  Ga g e Pro duc ts  Chrysle r  Ae vita s  Pro c to r a nd Ga mb le  Mo tt F o unda tio n  Do w  De tro it Dirt  Go o dwill

  17. T ra nspo rta tio n Ne two rk

  18. Mid-We st BPS Pro je c ts * Lansing Chicago * *Columbus

  20. I mpe tus fo r T CRPC’ s I nvo lve me nt  Gra c io usly de fine d a s a n: “Une xpe c te d Oppo rtunity”  T CRPC se e n a s lo g ic a l e ntity.  Cre a ting ne two rks o f susta ina b le pro g ra ms is wha t we do .

  21. I mpe tus fo r T CRPC’ s I nvo lve me nt  T CRPC’ s Gro undwa te r Ma na g e me nt Bo a rd’ s (GMB) g o a l is to pro te c t wa te r.  I de ntifie d suppo rt o f b usine sse s a nd o the r lo c a l e ntitie s in b e c o ming mo re “g re e n” a s a me a ns to a c hie ve this g o a l  Re c o g nize d:  I t ne e de d to b e fina nc ia lly via b le  Drive n b y use rs  Susta ina b le

  22. Mic hig a n ByPro duc t Syne rg y  F e b rua ry 2012  3 ye a r g ra nt $60,000 fro m E PA via MDE Q  50% ma tc h GMB  Go a l to c re a te a Mic hig a n BPS Ne two rk

  23. Ne w BPS F unding fo r 2013  $20K We llhe a d Pro te c tio n Gra nt – De lta Cha rte r T o wnship  $35K We llhe a d Pro te c tio n Gra nt – L a nsing Bo a rd Wa te r a nd L ig ht  Bo th will fo c us o n wo rking with b usine sse s to pro vide the m re so urc e s to impro ve the ir pra c tic e s a nd re duc e the ir risk to wa te r re so urc e s.

  24. MDE Q Ple a se Me e t MDE Q  T wo c o mple te ly diffe re nt pro g ra ms  Suppo rting sa me e nd g o a l  L e ve ra g ing pro g ra m do lla rs a nd re so urc e s

  25. Ultima te BPS Go a ls  Cre a te Mic hig a n BPS da ta b a se  Co ntinua lly re vie w po te ntia l syne rg ie s b e twe e n pa rtic ipa nts in Mic hig a n  Co ntinue to g ro w a nd sha pe BPS  Disse mina te pro c e ss a nd o utc o me s

  26. Cha lle ng e s  Sha ping the fra me wo rk witho ut sta rting fro m sc ra tc h  L e g a l  Pro mo tio ns a nd Ma rke ting  Disse mina tio n

  27. T ha nk yo u fo r yo ur c o nside ra tio n. Que stio ns?

More recommend