just in time learning for library research skills
play

Just-In-Time Learning for Library Research Skills Linda Stern, Peta - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

#THETA2015 Just-In-Time Learning for Library Research Skills Linda Stern, Peta Humphreys, Craig Patterson This work is licensed under a Crea ve Commons A ribu on 4.0 Interna onal License.


  1. #THETA2015� Just-In-Time Learning for Library Research Skills Linda Stern, Peta Humphreys, Craig Patterson This� work� is� licensed� under� a� Crea ve� Commons� A ribu on� 4.0� Interna onal� License.� �

  2. Engineering Students @Melbourne Challenges • Traditional “Library Lecture” inflexible. • Mixed level of library research skills. • Post-graduate & capstone research projects. • Multiple engineering disciplines. • English second language for many. Alignment • Melbourne’s Scholarly Information Future • eLearning Strategy • Scholarly Literacy Framework

  3. What we set out to do… Design Principles – Pedagogy – Engagement – On-demand

  4. Pedagogy Pedagogy: • Structure for Learning – Standard Online learning pedagogy • Explain, demonstrate, apply • ‘Chunk’ size • Expected time to complete • Self paced • Self assessment – Student input

  5. Engagement Engagement: • Student voice – We asked a few postgraduate students, ‘What do you wish you’d known about the library when starting your research?’ – Engineering students talking to Engineering students about what they think is important – A visible presence

  6. Student Voice • Bibliographic Software • Advanced Tips & Tricks • Filter bubbles, citation maps, alerts…

  7. Engagement Engagement: • “Your research” • Videos and interactivity – TED talks – ‘Library minute’ – Captivate interactive videos – Quizzes with feedback • Engineering-focussed images

  8. Accessibility • Anywhere. • Anytime. Future directions: • Multiple devices • Other disciplines “South Lawn Reflection” by Andrea Hurt. 31 March, 2015 https://www.facebook.com/unilibrary/photos/pb.154704304544775.- 2207520000.1430268694./1060934333921763/?type=3&theater

  9. What do the students think? • Initial survey (2013) – General availability to research students – Comments reshaped the resource • Pilot (2015) – 12 selected research students – In their first year of research – Anonymous survey

  10. Summary • Structure is important • Platform influences • Underpinning pedagogy • Engagement • Student voice – Topics – Presence – Feedback • Anywhere, anytime

  11. Thank you Videos • Mahdi Pourdanial • Olga Mikhaylovna • Graeme Gange Programming • Grady Fitzpatrick Melbourne Students & Learning Learning & Teaching Initiative grant

Recommend


More recommend