introduction
play

Introduction Feynman Integrals Calculus became in recent decades a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I NTRODUCTION TO D IFFERENTIAL E QUATIONS FOR F EYNMAN I NTEGRALS Oleksandr Gituliar http://gituliar.net/capp17 II. Institut fr Theoretische Physik Universitt Hamburg Computer Algebra in Particle Physics 2017 DESY (Hamburg) Introduction


  1. I NTRODUCTION TO D IFFERENTIAL E QUATIONS FOR F EYNMAN I NTEGRALS Oleksandr Gituliar http://gituliar.net/capp17 II. Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Hamburg Computer Algebra in Particle Physics 2017 DESY (Hamburg)

  2. Introduction Feynman Integrals Calculus — became in recent decades a science on its own. � 1 d d p 1 δ ( p 2 1 )...d d p m δ ( p 2 d d l 1 ...d d l n m ) n i ∈ Z D n 1 1 ... D n k � �� � � �� � k loops legs Numerical methods • Sector Decomposition, Subtraction Schemes, . . . Analytical methods • Feynman/Schwinger/Mellin-Barnes parametrization • Integration-By-Parts reduction Chetyrkin, Tkachov ’81 – Laporta algorithm Laporta ’00: AIR , FIRE , Reduze – Symbolic reduction: LiteRed Lee ’12 – private implementations • Method of Differential Equations Kotikov ’91, Remiddi ’97 – Epsilon Form Henn ’13 – Lee algorithm Lee ’14: Fuchsia , Epsilon • . . .

  3. Introduction Feynman Integrals Calculus — became in recent decades a science on its own. � 1 d d p 1 δ ( p 2 1 )...d d p m δ ( p 2 d d l 1 ...d d l n m ) n i ∈ Z D n 1 1 ... D n k � �� � � �� � k loops legs Integration-By-Parts reduction • Integral Families – integration momenta * loop – l 1 ,..., l n only * phase-space – p 1 ,..., p m only * mixed – set of denominators (topology) – master integrals • Reduction – any integral (from the family) in terms of masters including derivatives * – completely analytical – highly automated

  4. Plan for Today You will learn: • Integration-by-Parts Reduction – LiteRed • Differential Equations in Epsilon Form – Fuchsia • Examples 1. One-Loop Integral 2. Two-Loop Phase-Space Integral • Partial Fractioning • Expansion of Hypergeometric Functions

  5. Method of Differential Equations 1. Construct System of ODE (medium) • from definition (e.g. special functions) • from IBP rules – highly automated – AIR , FIRE , LiteRed , Reduze2 2. Find Epsilon Form (hard) • automated • Lee method: Fuchsia , epsilon 3. Solve System of ODE (easy) 4. Find Constants of Integration (medium) • depends on the problem

  6. Example 1 One-Loop Massive Self-Energy l p p � p µ p ν − g µν p 2 � = Π µν ab ( p 2 , m ) = δ ab Π ( p 2 , m ) l − p � Π ( p 2 , m ) = d n l F ( p , l , m ) • Arguments : from vectors to scalars F ( p , l , m ) → F ( l 2 , l · p , p 2 , m ) • In general, the number of scalar integration variables is given by N ( L , E ) = L ( L + 1) O ( L 2 ) ← another source of growing + LE ∼ complexity at higher orders 2 where E – number of external momenta , L – number of loop momenta – 1-loop propagator: N (1,1) = 2 – 4-loop propagator: N (4,1) = 14 (ask Jos Vermaseren about details)

  7. Example 1 Integration-by-Parts Reduction • The problem contains two denominators D 1 = l 2 − m 2 D 2 = ( l − p ) 2 − m 2 which map into our integration invariants in a unique way F ( p , l , m ) → F ( l 2 , l · p , p 2 , m ) → F ( D 1 , D 2 , p 2 , m ) • One integral family � 1 d n l F ( n 1 , n 2 ) = D n 1 1 D n 2 2 <<LiteRed‘ SetDim[n]; Declare[{m2}, Number, {l,p}, Vector]; NewBasis[$b, {sp[l]-m2, sp[l-p]-m2}, {l}, Directory->"b.ibp"]; GenerateIBP[$b]; AnalyzeSectors[$b]; FindSymmetries[$b];

  8. Example 1 Integration-by-Parts Reduction In dimensional regularization the integral over a total derivative is zero. � d � � d n l i q µ F ( p 1 ,..., l 1 ,...) d l µ i where q is arbitrary external or internal momenta. IBP[$b]

  9. Example 1 Master Integrals SolvejSectors /@ UniqueSectors[$b] MIs[$b] > {j[$b,0,1], j[$b,1,1]} • We obtain two master integrals � � 1 1 d n l d n l F 1 = F (0,1) = F 2 = F (1,1) = � l 2 − m 2 � � ( l − p ) 2 − m 2 � ( l − p ) 2 − m 2 • Any other integral is a linear combination of only these two, e.g., n − 2 n − 3 F (2,1) = 2 m 2 ( p 2 − 4 m 2 ) F 1 + p 2 − 4 m 2 F 2 • We can check that since we can do l → l + p transformation F (0,1) = F (1,0)

  10. Example 1 Differential Equations $ds = Dinv[#,sp[p,p]]& /@ MIs[$b] // IBPReduce; $ode = Coefficient[#, MIs[$b]]& /@ $ds; • This code produces a system of differential equations d F 1 d p 2 = 0 2 m 2 − ǫ p 2 d F 2 2 − 2 ǫ p 2 ( p 2 − 4 m 2 ) F 1 + p 2 ( p 2 − 4 m 2 ) F 2 d p 2 = where we work in n = 4 − 2 ǫ space-time dimensions This system is simple and we could solve it right away using <your favourite> method. Today, I want to demonstrate you how this and many other systems can be solved throug using their ǫ -form. As you will see this is a highly automated task. Exercise Derive another system of differential equations, but this time in m 2 . (Hint: use Fromj , D , and Toj functions instead of Dinv ).

  11. I. Epsilon Form • Classical Notation d F 1 d x = A 11 ( x , ǫ ) F 1 + A 12 ( x , ǫ ) F 2 d F 2 d x = A 21 ( x , ǫ ) F 1 + A 22 ( x , ǫ ) F 2 • Matrix Notation � A 11 ( x , ǫ ) � � F 1 � d ¯ F A 12 ( x , ǫ ) d x = A ( x , ǫ ) ¯ ¯ F where A = and F = A 21 ( x , ǫ ) A 22 ( x , ǫ ) F 2 It is very convenient to have our system in the epsilon form d G d x = ǫ B ( x ) G since in this case we can easily find the solution to any order in ǫ parameter, as we will see on the next slide. Some physical examples may lead to systems with ∼ 500 equations. Hence, it is very impor- tant to make this task automatic.

  12. II. A few words on Fuchsia Input • System of Ordinary Differential Equations A ( x , ǫ ,...), i.e., d F d x = A ( x , ǫ ,...) F ( x , ǫ ,...) Output • Equivalent System in the Epsilon Form d G d x = ǫ B ( x ,...) G ( x , ǫ ,...) • Corresponding Basis Transformation F ( x , ǫ ,...) = T ( x , ǫ ,...) × G ( x , ǫ ,...) • Other Operations – apply custom transformation – variable change – "sort" to block-diagonal form

  13. II. A few words on Fuchsia • Based on the Lee algorithm Lee ’14 – support additional symbols – alternative implementation: epsilon • Open-Source and Free Gituliar, Magerya ’16 ’17 – http://github.com/gituliar/fuchsia • Implemented in Python – SageMath – Maxima – Maple (optional) • Algorithm 1. Fuchsification (Jordan form) Get rid of apparent singularities 2. Normalization (eigenvalues, eigenvectors) Balance eigenvalues to α ǫ form 3. Factorization (solve linear equations) Reduce to the epsilon form

  14. II. A few words on Fuchsia

  15. Example 1 Epsilon Form by Fuchsia Let us introduce a new variable y , such that y 2 p 2 = − 4 m 2 1 − y 2 The new equations look as d F 1 d y = 0 � � d F 2 d y = 1 − ǫ ǫ 1 + y − 1 ǫ y m 2 F 1 + F 2 1 − y − y With the help of Fuchsia we find a new basis G 1 , G 2 given by the system F 1 = 4(1 − 2 ǫ ) 3(1 − ǫ ) G 1 3 m 2 G 1 − 2 4 F 2 = yG 2 For this basis the differential equations are the epsilon form d G 1 d y = 0 � � � � d G 2 2 ǫ ǫ ǫ ǫ G 1 − G 2 d y = 1 + y + 1 − y − 3 m 2 1 − y 1 + y

  16. III. Solutions We are looking for the solution of a given system of ordinary differential equations in the epsilon form d G d x = ǫ B ( x ) G as a Laurent series in ǫ G ( x , ǫ ) = G 0 ( x ) + G 1 ( x ) ǫ + G 2 ( x ) ǫ 2 + ... Let us put this "solution" into the initial equation d G 0 d x + d G 1 d x ǫ + d G 2 d x ǫ 2 + ... = ǫ B ( x ) G 0 + ǫ 2 B ( x ) G 1 we get d G 0 d G 1 d G 2 d G n d x = 0, d x = B ( x ) G 0 , d x = B ( x ) G 1 ... d x = B ( x ) G n − 1 This system can be easily solved (as promised) � � � � � G 0 = C 0 , G 1 = C 1 + d xB ( x ) C 0 , G 2 = C 2 + d xB ( x ) C 1 + d xB ( x ) C 0 ... � G n ( x ) = C n + d xB ( x ) G n − 1

  17. III. Solutions My implementation of the solution algorithm, which I use to get results for the next slide. SolveODE[m_, x_, ep_, n_, c_] := Module[ {$i, $j, $n, $sol, $sol0, $sol1}, $n = Length[m]; $sol[0] = Table[c[$j,0], {$j,1,$n}]; For[$i=1, $i<=n, $i++, $sol0 = Table[c[$j,$i], {$j,1,$n}]; $sol1 = Integrate[Dot[#,$sol[$i-1]],x]& /@ m; $sol[$i] = $sol0 + $sol1; ]; Sum[ep^$i*$sol[$i], {$i,0,n}] ];

  18. Example 1 Solutions • Master #1 F 1 ( y , m 2 ) = 4 1 + 4 � � 3 C (0) C (1) 1 − C (0) ǫ + ... 1 3 • Master #2 4 C (0) C (0) � � 1 − y �� ǫ � � F 2 ( y , m 2 ) = 1 2 4 yC (1) 1 − 6 m 2 C (1) 4 C (1) 1 − 6 m 2 C (0) ln 3 m 2 − + 2 + 3 m 2 y 2 y 1 + y • Finally, we need to find unknown integration constants whcih are functions of m 2 and ǫ , i.e. C (0) C (1) 1 ( m 2 , ǫ ), 1 ( m 2 , ǫ ), ... C (0) C (1) 2 ( m 2 , ǫ ), 2 ( m 2 , ǫ ), ...

  19. Example 1 Integration Constants #1 Master #1 (from Fuchsia ) F 1 ( y , m 2 ) = 4 1 + 4 � � 3 C (0) C (1) 1 − C (0) ǫ + ... 1 3 Closed-form solution from the literature (see Smirnov’s book) F (0, n ) = ( − 1) n Γ ( n − 2 + ǫ ) ( m 2 ) 2 − ǫ − n Γ ( n ) F 1 ( y , m 2 ) = F (0,1) = m 2 ǫ + m 2 � 1 − γ E − ln m 2 � + ... Result #1 1 = 3 m 2 � 2 − γ E − ln m 2 � 1 = 3 m 2 C (0) C (1) 4 ǫ 4 ǫ

  20. Example 1 Integration Constants #2 Result #1 1 = m 2 � 1 − γ E − ln m 2 � 1 = m 2 C (0) C (1) ǫ ǫ Master #2 (with Result #1 substituted) � � 2 y − γ E y − 2 C (0) 1 − y 2 − y ln m 2 + ln F 2 ( y , m 2 ) = 1 1 + y + ... ǫ + y We require that at the limit y → 0 ( p 2 → 0) our result is regular. This leads to the solution C 0 2 = 0 Result #2 � 1 − y � F 2 ( y , m 2 ) = 1 ǫ + 2 − γ E − ln m 2 + 1 y ln + ... 1 + y This is in agreement with T.Riemann Monday’s lecture!

Recommend


More recommend