improving college persistence by developing students
play

Improving College Persistence by Developing Students Noncognitive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Improving College Persistence by Developing Students Noncognitive Skills Brian Galla, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania Donald Kamentz , YES Prep Public Schools Laura Keane , uAspire What makes students successful? Non- Cognitive


  1. Improving College Persistence by Developing Students’ Noncognitive Skills • Brian Galla, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania • Donald Kamentz , YES Prep Public Schools • Laura Keane , uAspire

  2. What makes students successful? Non- Cognitive Cognitive IQ, memory, Literally knowledge, everything vocabulary, else etc.

  3. What makes students successful?

  4. Grit at Its Best Not Getting Off the Treadmill 5

  5. Gates-CMO College Grit Committee Approach Build Knowledge:  Deep dive into the research  Define framework for non-cogs Design Research-Based Practices  Partner with researchers to create strategies to build non-cogs Field-Test Theories:  Conduct interventions and measure impact

  6. Non-Cogs - The Research Mosh Pit

  7. DK-LK Practitioner Framework Key “Non-Cognitive” Habits Social Capital Motivation and Learning Strategies i nterpersonal Volition the “know-how” skills the “want” and “will” Goal Meta- Self- Self- Grit & setting and Belonging Mindset advocacy cognition Control resilience attainment

  8. Current Research: National College Persistence Study Research Focus Academic Partners K-12 Practitioners Partners Angela Duckworth (UPenn) District(s) Correlation between Sidney D’ Mello School District of non-cognitive traits Philadelphia (Notre Dame) and college Upper Darby School Chris Gabrieli ( Harvard) District enrollment and John Gabrieli (MIT) Boston Public Schools persistence Carol Dweck (Stanford) Districts Malleable Spring Branch ISD (TX) Greg Walton (Stanford) intelligence, fixed vs. Geoff Cohen (Stanford) CMOs growth-mindset, David Yeager (UT-Austin) Achievement First social belonging Aspire Public Schools Mastery Charter Schools YES Prep Public Schools 9

  9. Agenda  Define It: The Research on Noncognitive Skills  Doing It: Putting Research Into Practice  Discuss It: Question & Answer Time

  10. Agenda  Define It: The Research on Noncognitive Skills  Doing It: Putting Research Into Practice  Discuss It: Question & Answer Time

  11. IQ Alone Doesn’t Cut it! Delay of Gratification: “Marshmallow Test” vs. Later Now 12

  12. What is Self-Control? VS. The ability to voluntarily regulate thoughts, emotions, and behavior in the service of a valued goal. 13

  13. Try it! Self-Control Scale N = 15,455, M age = 22 years Mean score = 3.26 ( SD = 0.58) Range = 2.87 to 4.26 What the scale predicts: Higher GPA Less psychopathology and emotional problems Less binge eating, alcohol abuse Better relationships and interpersonal skills Better responses to stress and provocation Can’t have too much! (Tangney, Baumeister, & Boone, 2004: Cited: 1,070 ) 14

  14. Why is Self-Control Related to Academic Success? VS. 15

  15. The Diligence Task Play game or Do math watch movie 8 - 1 Play game ________ or Do math 7 watch 2 movie -6 -8 16

  16. The Diligence Task Performance: Number of Correct Math Problems Play game Solved or Do math watch movie 8 - 1 Play game ________ or Do math 7 watch 2 movie -6 -8 17

  17. Study 1 Study 2 M = 279.8 SD = 180.9 M = 229.6 SD = 177.4 18

  18. Diligence Task Performance 75 B = -5.59, p < .001 70 65 Number Correct 60 NEH 55 S UDH Study 1 50 S Study 2 B = -5.44, p < .001 45 40 35 30 1 2 3 4 5 Task Block 19

  19. Self-Control Predicts Diligence Task Performance Better than IQ 400 Diligence Task Performance 350 IQ: β = .11, p = .06, ns 300 SC 250 IQ 200 SC: β = .25, p < .001 150 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Quintiles 20

  20. Diligence Task Explains More Variance in GPA compared to IQ 3.15 2.95 Grade Point Average 2.75 DT IQ: β = .10, p = .09, ns 2.55 IQ 2.35 2.15 DT: β = .21, p < .001 1.95 1.75 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Quintiles 21

  21. Diligence Task Predicts High School Graduation 400 t = 3.76, p < .001 350 300 250 No 200 t = 1.43, p = .15, ns Yes 150 100 50 0 DT IQ 22

  22. Self-Control Predicts College Success 0.7 Correlation with Achievement 0.6 0.5 Primary education 0.4 Secondary education 0.3 College 0.2 0.1 0 -0.1 ( N > 70,000; Poropat, 2009) 23

  23. Research Take Home Message  Self-Control important (sometimes, more so) for academic achievement compared to IQ  Results found across the entire age spectrum: ◦ School readiness/pre-K ◦ K-12 ◦ College  Can be changed/improved, whereas IQ is less amenable to meaningful improvements 24

  24. Current Research: National College Persistence Study Research Focus Academic Partners K-12 Practitioners Partners Angela Duckworth (UPenn) District(s) Correlation between Sidney D’ Mello School District of non-cognitive traits Philadelphia (Notre Dame) and college Upper Darby School Chris Gabrieli ( Harvard) District enrollment and John Gabrieli (MIT) Boston Public Schools persistence Carol Dweck (Stanford) Districts Malleable Spring Branch ISD (TX) Greg Walton (Stanford) intelligence, fixed vs. Geoff Cohen (Stanford) CMOs growth-mindset, David Yeager (UT-Austin) Achievement First social belonging Aspire Public Schools Mastery Charter Schools YES Prep Public Schools 25

  25. Baseline Survey Assessment – Student Beliefs 26

  26. Baseline Survey Year 1 Findings This project included 1403 majority low-income, urban students across 10 schools in 4 states.

  27. Mindset Pilot Intervention “…Not all students know that the brain can get smarter, even though it may help them succeed… Write a letter to your friend telling them about what you just learned about the brain and why they shouldn’t be discouraged… ”

  28. Social Belonging Pilot Intervention “The most difficult transition from high school to college was coming from a situation where I knew every student for the past seven years to a new situation where I did not know one student before I arrived… I was pretty homesick, and I had to remind myself that making close friends takes time…”

  29. Intervention Enrollment Results Year 1 Findings These results included 332 majority low-income, urban students across 4 schools in 2 states.

  30. Intervention Social Integration Results Year 1 Findings – FT Enrollment Yeager & Walton (in prep) 100% 90% Percentage Reporting Behavior 80% 70% 60% 50% Control 40% Belonging 30% 20% 10% 62% 91% 52% 76% 66% 77% 0% Using academic Living on campus Extracurriculars support services Treatment vs. control: b = .74, t (50) = 3.05, p = .005 These results included 332 majority low-income, urban students across 2 schools in 1 state.

  31. Agenda  Define It: The Research on Noncognitive Skills  Doing It: Putting Research Into Practice  Discuss It: Question & Answer Time

  32. Implementation: Putting Theories Into Practice  What to implement? ◦ A psychological experience ◦ NOT a handout  How do you change psychology and make it matter over time? ◦ “Stealthy” ◦ Self-reinforcing through school experience  What do you need to design and implement? ◦ Student-centered approach ◦ Continued evaluation

  33. Putting Theories Into Practice Educator as Coach: Making Them Thirsty • MCII: Senior Grit Case Studies • College Non-Cog Knowledge and Standards • “Stealthy” Messaging • Culture Rituals • PD: “Wise Feedback” • Experiential Learning •

  34. Mastery’s College Advising Philosophy Advisor as Coach ◦ High bar – want to win (graduate TWICE!) ◦ High support – want to motivate and encourage ◦ Customized ◦ Honest appraisal ◦ Provide clear directions ◦ STUDENT is on the field. Self-sufficiency VS. 36

  35. C3: College Completion Coaches Network C3 Coordinator HS Staff College Peer IHE Staff C3 C3 C3

  36. MCII: Senior Grit Case Studies  Plan for College Persistence WHILE in HS  Senior Project: Grit College Study ◦ Theory: Based on Oettingen and Duckworth’s MCII work Products Case Study Analysis Campus Support Chart Off Campus Support Team Campus Map complete with all services labeled

  37. Educator as Coach “You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink.” But how do we make it thirsty?

  38. YES Prep’s “To & Through” Approach College Non-Cog Knowledge and Standards

  39. “Not ‐ so ‐ stealthy” Messaging 10,000 Students, College Ready By providing you with a high ‐ quality, college prep curriculum, YES Prep will undoubtedly prepare you to be a successful college student. YES Prep will also provide you with many opportunities and resources that you will be able to utilize throughout your college career.

  40. “Stealthy” Messaging

  41. I Am Sam MASTERY Shoemaker – ’11 Bucknell University – ’15 “College is challenging, it’s supposed to be. However, it isn’t impossible. As long as you go to class, do your work and stay focused, it can be a lot easier than you may think.”

  42. Senior Signing Day Celebration

  43. Professional Development: “Wise Feedback”

  44. Control group: “Wise feedback” I’m giving you group: these comments I’m giving you so you have these comments feedback on because I have your essay. high standards and I know that you can meet them.

  45. Experiential Learning to Build Social Capital Internships Summer Opportunities College Visits

Recommend


More recommend