iga lecture iv quantization of group valued moment maps
play

IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps Eckhard - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps Eckhard Meinrenken Adelaide, September 8, 2011 Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps Representation ring (Notation) The representation ring R ( G )


  1. IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps Eckhard Meinrenken Adelaide, September 8, 2011 Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  2. Representation ring (Notation) The representation ring R ( G ) ⊂ C ∞ ( G ) is the subring generated by characters χ V of finite-dimensional G -representations V . It has basis the irreducible characters. G compact, connected, T ⊂ G maximal torus, t = Lie( T ), + ⊂ t ∗ positive Weyl chamber, t ∗ P ⊂ t ∗ (real) weight lattice, P + = P ∩ t ∗ + dominant weights ⇒ R ( G ) = Z [ P + ]. 0 Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  3. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Recall axioms of Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → g ∗ : 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = −� dΦ , ξ � , 2 d ω = 0, 3 ker( ω ) = 0. Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  4. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Recall axioms of Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → g ∗ : 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = −� dΦ , ξ � , 2 d ω = 0, 3 ker( ω ) = 0. Definition of quantization Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  5. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Recall axioms of Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → g ∗ : 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = −� dΦ , ξ � , 2 d ω = 0, 3 ker( ω ) = 0. Definition of quantization Symplectic form determines a Spin c -structure. Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  6. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Recall axioms of Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → g ∗ : 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = −� dΦ , ξ � , 2 d ω = 0, 3 ker( ω ) = 0. Definition of quantization Symplectic form determines a Spin c -structure. Suppose ( M , ω, Φ) pre-quantizable, pick pre-quantum line bundle L → M . Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  7. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Recall axioms of Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → g ∗ : 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = −� dΦ , ξ � , 2 d ω = 0, 3 ker( ω ) = 0. Definition of quantization Symplectic form determines a Spin c -structure. Suppose ( M , ω, Φ) pre-quantizable, pick pre-quantum line bundle L → M . Let / ∂ L Spin c -Dirac operator with coefficients in L . Define Q ( M ) = index G ( / ∂ L ) ∈ R ( G ) . Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  8. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Q ( M ) ∈ R ( G ) is independent of the choices made. Basic Properties: Q ( M 1 ∪ M 2 ) = Q ( M 1 ) + Q ( M 2 ), Q ( M 1 × M 2 ) = Q ( M 1 ) Q ( M 2 ), Q ( M ∗ ) = Q ( M ) ∗ , The coadjoint orbit G .µ, µ ∈ t ∗ + is pre-quantized if and only if µ ∈ P + . In this case, Q ( G .µ ) = χ µ . Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  9. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Let R ( G ) → Z , χ �→ χ G be the map defined by χ G µ = δ µ, 0 . Theorem (Quantization commutes with reduction) Suppose M is a compact pre-quantized Hamiltonian G-space. Then Q ( M ) G = Q ( M / / G ) . This was conjectured (and proved in many cases) by Guillemin-Sternberg. Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  10. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Let R ( G ) → Z , χ �→ χ G be the map defined by χ G µ = δ µ, 0 . Theorem (Quantization commutes with reduction) Suppose M is a compact pre-quantized Hamiltonian G-space. Then Q ( M ) G = Q ( M / / G ) . This was conjectured (and proved in many cases) by Guillemin-Sternberg. One may take care of the singularities of M / / G by partial desingularization (M-Sjamaar). Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  11. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces More generally, let N ( µ ) , µ ∈ P + be the multiplicities given as � Q ( M ) = N ( µ ) χ µ . µ ∈ P + Corollary For all µ ∈ P + , N ( µ ) = Q ( M / / µ G ) where / µ G = Φ − 1 ( O ) / G = ( M × O − ) / M / / G . Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  12. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces More generally, let N ( µ ) , µ ∈ P + be the multiplicities given as � Q ( M ) = N ( µ ) χ µ . µ ∈ P + Corollary For all µ ∈ P + , N ( µ ) = Q ( M / / µ G ) where / µ G = Φ − 1 ( O ) / G = ( M × O − ) / M / / G . Consequences Let ∆( M ) ⊂ t ∗ + be the moment polytope. Then N ( µ ) = 0 unless µ ∈ P + ∩ ∆( M ). If M is multiplicity-free (e.g. a symplectic toric space) then N ( µ ) ∈ { 0 , 1 } for all µ ∈ P + . Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  13. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Q ( M ) = index G ( / ∂ ) may also be computed by localization: Theorem (Atiyah-Segal-Singer) � � Td( F ) Ch( L | F , g ) Q ( M )( g ) = D C ( ν F , g ) F F ⊂ M g a sum over fixed point manifolds F ⊂ M g . Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  14. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces One can also write the fixed point formula in ‘Spin c -form’. This will be more convenient for our discussion. Theorem (Atiyah-Segal-Singer) � � � A ( F ) Ch( L| F , g ) 1 / 2 Q ( M )( g ) = D R ( ν F , g ) F F ⊂ M g a sum over fixed point manifolds F ⊂ M g . Here L is the ‘Spin c -line bundle’ L = L 2 ⊗ K − 1 , and ν F is the normal bundle to F . Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  15. Quantization of Hamiltonian G -spaces Here the various characteristic forms are, in terms of curvature forms: A ( F ) = det − 1 / 2 � 2 π R TF )), j ( z ) = sinh( z / 2) ( j ( 1 R z / 2 � � µ ( t ) exp( 1 Ch( L| F , t ) = tr C 2 π R L ) � � 1 2 rk( ν F ) det 1 / 2 1 − A F ( t ) − 1 exp( 1 D R ( ν F , t ) = i 2 π R F ) . R Here µ ( t ) ∈ U(1) is the action of t on L F , and A F ( t ) ∈ Γ( F , O( ν F )) is the action of t on ν F . Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  16. Quantization of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces ? Recall axioms of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → G : 2 Φ ∗ ( θ L + θ R ) · ξ , 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = − 1 2 d ω = − Φ ∗ η , 3 ker( ω ) ∩ ker(dΦ) = 0. Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  17. Quantization of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces ? Recall axioms of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → G : 2 Φ ∗ ( θ L + θ R ) · ξ , 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = − 1 2 d ω = − Φ ∗ η , 3 ker( ω ) ∩ ker(dΦ) = 0. Questions / Problems Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  18. Quantization of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces ? Recall axioms of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → G : 2 Φ ∗ ( θ L + θ R ) · ξ , 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = − 1 2 d ω = − Φ ∗ η , 3 ker( ω ) ∩ ker(dΦ) = 0. Questions / Problems Where should Q ( M ) take values in ?? Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  19. Quantization of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces ? Recall axioms of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → G : 2 Φ ∗ ( θ L + θ R ) · ξ , 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = − 1 2 d ω = − Φ ∗ η , 3 ker( ω ) ∩ ker(dΦ) = 0. Questions / Problems Where should Q ( M ) take values in ?? ω is not closed, hence ‘pre-quantum line bundle’ does not make sense. Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  20. Quantization of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces ? Recall axioms of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → G : 2 Φ ∗ ( θ L + θ R ) · ξ , 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = − 1 2 d ω = − Φ ∗ η , 3 ker( ω ) ∩ ker(dΦ) = 0. Questions / Problems Where should Q ( M ) take values in ?? ω is not closed, hence ‘pre-quantum line bundle’ does not make sense. ω could be degenerate, so ‘compatible almost complex structure’ does not make sense. Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  21. Quantization of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces ? Recall axioms of q-Hamiltonian G -spaces, Φ: M → G : 2 Φ ∗ ( θ L + θ R ) · ξ , 1 ι ( ξ M ) ω = − 1 2 d ω = − Φ ∗ η , 3 ker( ω ) ∩ ker(dΦ) = 0. Questions / Problems Where should Q ( M ) take values in ?? ω is not closed, hence ‘pre-quantum line bundle’ does not make sense. ω could be degenerate, so ‘compatible almost complex structure’ does not make sense. However, we constructed a ‘twisted Spin c -structure’. Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  22. Pre-quantization of q-Hamiltonian spaces To simplify the discussion, assume G compact, 1-connected and simple. Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  23. Pre-quantization of q-Hamiltonian spaces To simplify the discussion, assume G compact, 1-connected and simple. Then H 1 ( G , Z ) = H 2 ( G , Z ) = 0 , H 3 ( G , Z ) = Z . Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  24. Pre-quantization of q-Hamiltonian spaces To simplify the discussion, assume G compact, 1-connected and simple. Then H 1 ( G , Z ) = H 2 ( G , Z ) = 0 , H 3 ( G , Z ) = Z . Take · to be the basic inner product on g . Then η = 1 12 θ L · [ θ L , θ L ] ∈ Ω 3 ( G ) represents a generator of H 3 ( G , Z ) ⊂ H 3 ( G , R ). Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

  25. Pre-quantization of q-Hamiltonian spaces The condition d ω = − Φ ∗ η means that ( ω, η ) defines a cocycle for the relative cohomology H 3 (Φ , R ). Eckhard Meinrenken IGA Lecture IV: Quantization of group-valued moment maps

Recommend


More recommend