Heavy Vehicle Accreditation and Activity Update Paul Starling – Heavy Vehicle Services
2 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 Provides a quantifiable and effective tool in ensuring that sustained road safety standards are maintained as part of heavy vehicle operations. Affords evidence that operators are complying with regulatory responsibilities. Maintains a satisfactory minimum standard in relation to Maintenance, Adherence with Fatigue requirements and loading / dimension control. Achieved through a formal auditing regime.
3 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 • Entry Audit – Required to begin the Heavy Vehicle Accreditation Process • Bridge Supervision Audit During the current financial year there have been 357 bridge supervision audits conducted. Compliance Audits - • Scheduled • Random • Triggered
4 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 Common Non Conformances found - • Vehicles with no roadworthy certificate/inspection/checklist ; • Commercial Vehicle Driver Medicals have expired; • Commercial Vehicle Drivers Medicals do not exist; • Vehicle maintenance does not reflect the maintenance schedules in the operators policy and procedure manual; • Drivers operating outside the approved ”commercial vehicle operating standard ”;
5 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 Random - These are sometimes confused with “triggered” audits – THERE IS A DIFFERENCE! A random audit is initiated through a computer generated sample being created comprising of 5% of accredited operators each year. • Conducted by Main Roads staff or auditors from a Panel Contract • Audit costs are met by Main Roads • This year approximately 220 Random audits will be conducted
6 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 Triggered - Usually initiated through - • Poor history in regards to on road compliance (maintenance, fatigue or loading / dimension related breaches) • Crash involvement or history • Complaints received These are conducted by auditors from the Accreditation Section at HVS (no external auditors used)
7 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 If an audit is not received by the due date or fails to meet the required standard – • Accreditation can be suspended or • Accreditation can be revoked Resulting in the operators permits becoming invalid Main Roads WA also offers a consultation service to assist operators in meeting accreditation requirements.
8 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 • Currently Accredited under WA HVA = 4,459 • Non Compliant = 189 • Expired = 149 • Revoked = 225 • Retired = 4125 (SINCE INCEPTION)
Compliance Activities and Update
10 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 Date Location Roadblock Type Total Vehicles Total Non- Roadworthy Defect Load Restraint Intercepted Compliant Notices issued to Offences Combinations Vehicles 29/1/2016 Great Northern Inter-agency 84 25 (30%) 16 (19%) 7 (8%) Highway, Upper Swan 21/12/2015 Great Northern Inter-agency 50 13 (26%) 12 (24%) 1 (2%) Highway, Upper Swan 16/12/2015 Port Beach Road, Inter-agency 137 50 (36%) 37 (27%) 4 (3%) North Fremantle 7/10/2015 Port Beach Road, Inter-agency 119 29 (24%) 20 (17%) 0 North Fremantle
11 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 OFFENCE TYPE MAX PENATLY FINE IMPOSED BY COURT Exceed quad axle mass limit $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Exceed exempted mass limit $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Exceed exempted mass limit $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload (quad) $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload (quad axle) $ 2,400-6,000 $ 18,000.00 Exceed exempted mass limit $ 12,000-30,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload (quad axle) $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload (tandem drive axle) $ 7,000-15,500 $ 7,000.00 Overload (quad axle) $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload (quad axle) $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload (quad axle) $ 2,400-6,000 $ 12,000.00 Overload (tri drive axle) $ 2,400-6,000 $ 15,000.00
12 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 Chain of Responsibility Investigation activity – The investigation team have undertaken 23 investigations on a range of offences, with the resultant actions; • Total of 34 charges completed or pending court outcome (in addition to 8 infringements deemed to be appropriate sanction) • 3 significant investigations are ongoing • 5 investigations resulted in no further action as allegations in original referrals could not be validated during the investigation.
13 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 An example of a recent Chain of Responsibility Investigation An investigation was launched into a Transport Company as a result of a load restraint breach (load dislodged on the freeway) It was found that the company had implemented sufficient policy and procedure to provide a ‘reasonable steps defence’ However, the Logistics Manager had not complied with the companies procedures
14 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 An example of a recent Chain of Responsibility Investigation Both the driver and Logistic Manager were charged under CoR legislation RESULT Both Driver and Manager were found guilty and were EACH fined – $1,000 for a severe loading breach and $1,000 for a severe dimension breach (caused by the load moving in transit)
Mass Management
16 23 May 2016 Transafe Forum June 2016 Main Roads are currently scheduling a number of Information sessions in Perth and Regional areas specifically dealing with AMMS and Accreditation Modules. For further information, locations and dates please contact the HVS Helpdesk on 138 486 Or on the Main Roads WA website www.mainroads.wa.gov.au
THANK YOU
Recommend
More recommend
