the caep accreditation council
play

THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL Bradley Duncan; Accreditation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL Bradley Duncan; Accreditation Associate, CAEP Vince ONeill; Accreditation Director, CAEP Washington, District of Columbia September 2017 OBJECTIVE GAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL AND


  1. THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL Bradley Duncan; Accreditation Associate, CAEP Vince O’Neill; Accreditation Director, CAEP Washington, District of Columbia September 2017

  2. OBJECTIVE GAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION COUNCIL AND ACCREDITATION DECISION MAKING PROCESS Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 2

  3. OVERVIEW • Purpose • Timelines • Responsibilities • Structure • Role(s) • Decisions Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 3 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

  4. PURPOSE • Oversight of accreditation policies • Review & evaluate EPPs • Handle complaints against accredited EPPs • Develop a quality assurance system Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 4

  5. TIMELINES • Council meets twice a year to review cases • Reviews occur semester after site visit • Decision notification within 30 days • Stipulation removal Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 5

  6. ACCREDITATION COUNCIL STRUCTURE • Fluctuating number of councilors ▪ P12 practitioners, higher education, policy makers, and public representatives ▪ Alternates • Committees • Vice Chair • Chair Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 6 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

  7. ROLES Various stakeholders involved • CAEP Staff ▪ Liaison between Council and EPP • Councilors ▪ Conduct reviews (e.g. panel reviews, stipulation removal) ▪ Serve on committees • Lead Site Visitors ▪ Participates in initial panels • EPP Representatives ▪ Observe initial panel Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 7 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT ▪ Secondary Bullet in 24 point Ce

  8. REVIEW AND EVALUATE • Council reviews materials related to site visit ▪ Self-study report ▪ Formative Feedback Report ▪ Site Visit Report ▪ Addendum ▪ Rejoinder • Final decision ▪ Areas for Improvement/ Stipulations ▪ Standards met/unmet Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 8 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

  9. THREE STEP REVIEW PROCESS Initial Joint Full Panel Panel Council Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 9

  10. APPEALS Oversight by Appeals Council ▪ Adverse action only ▪ Separate entity from Council Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 12 SECTION OR OTHER CONTENT

  11. QUESTIONS? Bradley.Duncan@caepnet.org Vince.ONeill@caepnet.org Fall 2017 | Washington, D.C. 13

Recommend


More recommend