Hadron Physics at J-PARC Hiroaki Ohnishi RIKEN Nishina Center
Goal for hadron physics at J-PARC We believed hadron itself will be good experimental laboratory for QCD at Low energy Chiral symmetry Color symmetry - hidden symmetry - gauge symmetry Hadron mass Color confinement Symmetry of QCD Exotic hadron meson in nuclei Hadron spectra
Meson in nuclei ● Probably most successive study for meson in nuclei is the study of pionnic atom. Pionic-atom K. Suzuki et al. Phys. Rev. Lett 92(2004)072302 Interaction between Meson and nuclei Quark condensate <qq>
Systematic study of dynamical chiral symmetry breaking and partial restoration ● Mesic-nuclei factory (meson-nucleus bound state!) – Strangeness in nuclei ● K aonic Nucleus ( K-pp...) J-PARC E15/E27 ● double Kaonic nucleus(K-K-pp) J-PARC LoI – Vector meson in nuclei ● ω-mesic nucleus J-PARC E26 ● Φ-mesin nucleus J-PARC E29 – Chiral symmetry of baryon : nucleon-N(1535) ● η-mesic nucleus J-PARC LoI – U A (1) amonaly ● η'-mesic nucleus
Search for Kaonic nuclei K-pp bound state ● J-PARC E15: 3He(K - ,n) M. Iwasaki RIKEN et al. K - 3He → “ppK - ” + n using 1 GeV/c K - Missing mass (using neutron) Invariant mass reconstruction ( Λ +p) Full kinematics reconstruction formation & decay
Search for φ meson bound state p K + J-PARC E29 φ ( H. Ohnishi,RIKEN et al. ) K - p φ K + Using p(p, φ ) φ reaction φ absorbed nucleus Λ by nucleon antiproton beam with 1.0 – 1.1 GeV/c Main spectrometer ToF wall Large acceptance for +Cherenkov forward going φ meson K (for missing mass analysis) CDC K- + Large solid angle for the decay particles, K + / Λ , from φ mesic nucleus
ω meson in nucleus ● J-PARC E26 experiment (K. Ozawa,KEK et al.) ● Producing w meson using ( π − ,n) reaction ● ω meson will be produce at rest ( zero momentum respect to nucleus) to choosing incident pion momentum ● ω line shape in nucleus evaluated via π 0 γ decay channel of ω
φ mesons in normal nuclear media Invariant mass spectra for φ meson ● in heavy nucleus shows 3.4% mass shift 3.6 times width broadening when only the slowly moving phi mesons with respect to the target nuclei were selected ( βγ φ <1.25) J-PARC E16 High statistics δ m φ = -35 MeV @ ρ = ρ 0 Systematic study
Goal for hadron physics at J-PARC We believed hadron itself will be good experimental laboratory for QCD at Low energy Chiral symmetry Color symmetry - hidden symmetry - gauge symmetry Hadron mass Color confinement Symmetry of QCD Exotic hadron Hadron in nuclei Hadron spectra
Search for exotic hadron ● Penta-quark state??? – Penta quark state is not forbidden in QCD – But... why only a few candidates are observed? – What is the mechanism to forming hadrons ● How dose color confinement works? Spring-8 : LEPS PRC 79,025210(2009) γ d→K + K - pn Very narrow width ~ 1 MeV Negative results from High energy
Search for penta-quark at J-PARC ● J-PARC E19 experiment ( M. Naruki/KEK et al. ) ● Pentaquark formation using ( π ,K) reaction π - + p → K - +X ● Signal identified with missing mass spectroscopy using out going K -
Search for exotic hadron ● Penta-quark state??? – Penta quark state is not forbidden in QCD – But... why only a few candidates are observed? – What is the mechanism to forming hadrons ● How dose color confinement works? Spring-8 : LEPS J-PARC : E19 PRC 79,025210(2009) γ d→K + K - pn p( π - ,K - ) Direct Θ + production experiment : K + +n→ Θ + →K 0 s p ( J-PARC LOI )
Exotic hadron? ● Λ (1405) : – The lightest excited baryon with J P =1/2 - – Mass : 1406.5±4.0 MeV ( just bellow KN threshold) 1435 MeV Λ (1405) KN – Width : 50±2 MeV – Decay : 100 % Σπ 1331 MeV πΣ – normal baryon or KN bound state or penta? Nature of Λ (1405) need to be understood Strongly couple to the KN interaction
J-PARC E31 H. Noumi/RCNP
Future direction of Hadron physics at J-PARC
Goal for hadron physics at J-PARC We believed hadron itself will be good experimental laboratory for QCD at Low energy Chiral symmetry Color symmetry - hidden symmetry - gauge symmetry Hadron mass Color confinement Symmetry of QCD What is missing subject?
Double charmonium New direction? production で X(3940) ● New exotic states recently found at Belle/BaBar/BES.... B →J/ ψ π + π - K 崩壊 の中に X(3872) 発見 P R L 9 B → ψ ’ π K Z(4430) 1 , P 2 X(3872) R 6 2 L 1 0 0 0 0 1 , ( 1 2 4 0 2 0 0 3 0 M J /ψππ -M J/ ψ (GeV) ) 1 ( 2 0 1 Tetraquark candidate with charm quark has been discovered!! 0 ) Hadron with charm quark may open new door to hadron physics at J-PARC
Goal for hadron physics at J-PARC We believed hadron itself will be good experimental laboratory for QCD at Low energy Chiral symmetry Color symmetry - hidden symmetry - gauge symmetry Hadron mass Color confinement Symmetry of QCD Hadron with heavy Flavor strangeness → charm
Shopping list for future! ● systematic study of “meson in nuclei” → hadron-hadron interaction which may lead us to origin of hadron mass “ chiral symmetry restoration” ● Spectroscopy of – S=-1, -2, -3 baryons and even charmed baryons! which may give us hints of “confinement” ● High precision hyper nuclei spectroscopy – Baryon in nuclear matter? ● Charm physics → reinvestigation SU(3) world using charm quark as a probe!
New physics opportunity at J-PARC Hadron physics with High-p anti-protons
Physics reach using p J. Haidenbauer and Few Body Syst.50:183-186,2011 Charmonium Production threshold Open charm cross section pp → J/ Ψ pp → D 0 D 0 @ 4.05 GeV/c @ 6.4 GeV/c pp → Ψ (3770) @ 6.6 GeV/c σ DD ~ 100 nb; pp → X(3872) @ 7.0 GeV/c Problem is its small p momentum >7 GeV/c cross section
Feasibility? ● How much antiproton beam will be available? – J-PARC MR : 270 kW, 30% loss Ni target – Acceptance for beam line spectrometer ~ 2msr% 4 x 10 7 /6s: 4 GeV/c p What does this mean? 1 x 10 7 /6s: 10 GeV/c p
Luminosity for p at J-PARC ● Working assumption – 1g/cm 2 liquid Hydrogen target 2x10 30 /cm 2 /s @ 4 GeV/c 1x 10 30 /cm 2 /s @ 8 GeV/c PANDA Luminosity Max ~10 32 /cm 2 /s Hadron physics with antiproton beam is not only possible at PANDA/GSI ! We can do it using antiproton beam at J-PARC!
Charmonium production ● Charmonium production cross section at pole ( σ 0 ) – σ pp→J/ ψ → µµ @4.05 GeV/c ~ 300 nb – σ pp→ ψ '→ µµ @6.6 GeV/c ~ 2.9 nb – σ pp→X(3872)→J/ ψππ @7 GeV/c ~ 13 nb ● Effective cross section – σ effective ~ σ 0 x Γ charmonium / ∆ E ( ∆ E : energy spread of the beam ) ● Expected ∆ E : – dp/p=±1% → ∆ E~24 MeV ● Effective cross section – σ pp→J/ ψ → µµ ∼ 1.2 nb – σ ππ ψ ∼ 1.6 pb → ' µµ → – σ pp → X(3872) → J /ψππ ∼ 1.3 nb ( Γ assumed to be 2.3 MeV)
J/Ψ production ? ● Luminosity ~ 2 µ b -1 /s Muon spectrometer at J-PARC ● 1 month ~ 2x10 6 s ● Integrated Luminosity MuID 2 ~ 4 pb -1 Absorber ● Energy spred of the beam dE ~ 23 MeV MuID 1 MuID 2 ● σ pp→J/ ψ → µµ @4.05 GeV/c Return Yoke ~ 300 nb Absorber SC solenoid coil ● σ effective = σ peak ∗Γ ψ /dE TOF ~ 1.2 nb R=70m Tracker Z MuID 1 Tracker Absorber TOF MuID 2 Return Yoke MuID1 Absorber MuID2 2.0m
J/Ψ production ? ● Luminosity ~ 2 µ b -1 /s ● 1 month ~ 2x10 6 s ● Integrated Luminosity ~ 4 pb -1 ● Energy spred of the beam dE ~ 23 MeV ● σ pp→J/ ψ → µµ @4.05 GeV/c ~ 300 nb ● σ effective = σ peak ∗Γ ψ /dE ~ 1.2 nb ● 4800. J/ ψ → µµ can be produced in 1 month ● 30 % efficiency+Acc etc → 1400 J/ ψ → µµ / month What we can learn? A-dependence of production cross section to investigate J/ ψ -N interaction
Charm physics at J-PARC? ● Charmed meson production rate? – J/ ψ µµ → ~ 10 3 /month – Ψ ' µµ → ∼ 50/ month – X(3872) → J/ ψππ µµππ → ~ 100/month – D mesons, ● DD at 7 GeV/c ~ 480,000 / month Charmonium-nucleon interaction can be investigate by nuclear mass number dependence of charmonium production But question is what physics behind!
Comment on PANDA v.s. J-PARC J/ ψ production on nuclei ● With storage ring experiment, like PANDA, J/ ψ production cross section will be dramatically decreased, because of the fermi momentum of nucleon in nuclei. ● On the other hand, at J-PARC, effect of momentum spread of nucleon in nuclei will be compensate by relatively large momentum spread in beam momentum. Competitive experiment can be possible!
Any other ideas??? ● Nucleus with anti-proton? ( stealing from Yue Ma(GSI)'s idea) w/ pbar w/o pbar density distribution of 16 O I.N. Mishustin, et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, p.035201, (2005) Cold QGP???
However,such high momentum anti-proton is not available at current J-PARC facility How to realize?
J-PARC hadron hall extension ● RIKEN-JPARC cooperation center project Extend hadron hall ( more than x 2 ) 太平洋 Two more production targets for secandary beam Extention New beamline, spectrometers Design started together with nuclear physics community ~ $150 M project We hope to start 2013 Complete 2017
Recommend
More recommend