fusion hindrance and she
play

Fusion hindrance and SHE D. Boilley GANIL and Univ. Caen CEA, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fusion hindrance and SHE D. Boilley GANIL and Univ. Caen CEA, Saclay: On the prediction for the SHE production RCNP, Osaka: B. Giraud ( ) Yasuhisa Abe GANIL, Caen: ( )


  1. Fusion hindrance and SHE D. Boilley GANIL and Univ. Caen  CEA, Saclay: On the prediction for the SHE production RCNP, Osaka:  B. Giraud  ( 大阪大学核物理研究センター ) Yasuhisa Abe   GANIL, Caen: ( 阿部恭久)  Anthony Marchix Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011  Yoann Lallouet Huzhou Teachers’ College:  ( 湖州师范学院 )  Ankara university: Caiwan Shen  ( 沈彩万 )  Bülent Yilmaz

  2. Questions for theoreticians  Can we guide the experiments ?  What is the shell correction energy ? Difficulties On the prediction for the SHE production  Models cannot be extrapolated from lighter systems  Fusion hindrance Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011  Extremely low cross sections  Few data with few information

  3. Blocking technique in crystals  Introduction  Premier point On the prediction for the SHE production  Chapitre 1  Section 1  … Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011 F. Goldenbaum et al., PRL 82 (1999) 5012

  4. Direct evidence for long fission times Mesurements at GANIL by crystal blocking techniques Fission barriers Z = 124 A = 312 From P. MÖLLER et al., At least 12 % of the capture At. Dat. And Nucl. Dat. Tab. 59 (1995) 185 events with a life time longer than On the prediction for the SHE production 10 -18 s Quasi-elastic (target) Z = 120 A = 296 At least 10 % of the capture events with a life time longer than 10 -18 s Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011 Z = 114 A = 282 Very low statistic or no events with a life time longer than 10 -18 s 1 � f � 10 � 21 s M. Morjean et al, Eur. Phys. J. D45 (2007) 27 & PRL101, 072701 (2008)

  5. KEWPIE 2 Main ingredients  Formalism:  Weisskopf or Hauser- Feshbach  Bohr-Wheeler  Level density:  Bohr-Mottelson with On the prediction for the SHE production angular dependence  Level density parameter:  Töke-Swiatecki  Suppression of shell Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011 energy corrections according to Ignatyuk dP  Collective n P f + � i n ) P i i � 1 ( t ) � ( � i i ( t ) dt = � i � 1 enhancement included A. Marchix, PhD thesis, Univ. Caen (2007)

  6. Simplified model  Fission vs neutron Bf=Bn evaporation  Bn=6 MeV & Bf Fission time constant along the chain On the prediction for the SHE production  Long fission times mean:  B f ≈ B n Pre-scission neutrons  Long fission time events occur after Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011 evaporation of several neutrons  We cannot extract Bf of each isotope D.B. et al, IJMP E17 (2008) 1681-1693

  7. What about Δ E shell ? a ground = a .(1 + (1 � e � E */ E d ). � E shell ) E * B f � e � E */ E d . � E shell On the prediction for the SHE production  Experimental results for Z=120 and 124 cannot be reproduced with Möller’s table Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011  Very large Δ E shell for the first isotopes of the evaporation chain  Potential structure effects ?

  8. On the prediction for the SHE production Preliminary E* = 20MeV E E* = 2MeV E ? = 0 = 5MeV Structure effect 2 Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  9. On the prediction for the SHE production Residue cross sections Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  10. KEWPIE 2 Specificity  It is not a Monte-Carlo code to calculate very low probabilities  It is based on a discretisation in bins of the energy spectra: On the prediction for the SHE production Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  11. Residue cross sections Important parameters of KEWPIE2  Shell correction energy -> correction factor � E shell = f . � E Moller  Damping Energy E d On the prediction for the SHE production a ground = a .(1 + (1 � e � E */ E d ). � E shell ) E *  Originally, Ed =18.5 MeV B f � e � E */ E d . � E shell Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011  Reduced friction β =2.10 21 s -1 A. Marchix, PhD thesis, Univ. Caen (2007)

  12. Results  Fitting the residue cross sections gives very strong constraint on Δ E shell … • Precision of 1 MeV On the prediction for the SHE production  … if we know the fusion cross section Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  13. Reaction Reseparation Quasi-fission Fission On the prediction for the SHE production Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011 Inner barrier Coulomb barrier SHE How to assess the fusion model?

  14. Experimental fusion hindrance On the prediction for the SHE production Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011 K.-H. Schmidt & W. Morawek Rep. Prog. Phys. 54 (1991) 949

  15. On the prediction for the SHE production Position of the inner barrier Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  16. Importance of the neck The value of the neck parameter differs from authors On the prediction for the SHE production Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  17. Neck dynamics V( ε )=f. ε On the prediction for the SHE production ε 0 1 We solved the Smoluchowski equation Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011  Neck equilibrates very quickly  < ε > ≈ 0.1

  18. On the prediction for the SHE production Fusion hindrance for symmetric reactions Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  19. On the prediction for the SHE production Fusion hindrance for symmetric reactions Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  20. On the prediction for the SHE production Influence of the shift Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  21. On the prediction for the SHE production Borderline between hindered and non hindered reactions Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  22. Adiabatic approximation Fast degree of freedom  V( ε )=f. ε (neck) vs slow degree of freedom (r) Tensor coupling  Shift of the initial condition  in r ε On the prediction for the SHE production 0 1 Larger hindrance due to  dynamical coupling! Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  23. On the prediction for the SHE production solution for a saddle made parabolas with 2 Exact Test on a simple case Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

  24. On the prediction for the SHE production http://www.ensarfp7.eu/workshops/fushe2012/ Advertisement Kazimierz Dolny, Sept. 20011

Recommend


More recommend