fighting feral animals for production and biodiversity
play

Fighting feral animals for production and biodiversity production - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fighting feral animals for production and biodiversity production and biodiversity outcomes. Darren Marshall Queensland Murray-Darling Committee Working together healthy landscapes, viable communities Outline Outline Biology


  1. Fighting feral animals for production and biodiversity production and biodiversity outcomes. Darren Marshall Queensland Murray-Darling Committee “Working together – healthy landscapes, viable communities”

  2. Outline Outline  Biology and Ecology  Distribution and  Distribution and abundance  Impacts  Impacts  Control techniques  C  Current Research t R h  Future research 2 www.qmdc.org.au

  3. Biology gy • Adult male 80-100kg, Female 50–60kg, exceptional animals up to 260kg+ • In favourable conditions breeding occurs all year round • Females have a 21 day oestrus cycle, gestation 113 days, litter of 4–10 piglets depending on age, weight and food supply • S Sow can successfully mate 2–3 months of farrowing, f ll t 2 3 th f f i allowing 2 litters per year in a good season • Weaning occurs after 2-3 months • S Sexual maturity reached when sows weigh 25kg l t it h d h i h 25k • Few animals live more than 5 years 3 www.qmdc.org.au

  4. Ecology Ecology • Pigs have few sweat glands so are required to drink more water and wallow to cool off • Prefer dense cover for protection from p sun and main predators – humans. • Female and juveniles live in small family groups with home range of 2-20sqkm • Adult males are typically solitary with home range of 8 - 50sqkm • These ranges vary with season, food availability and disturbance disturbance • Feral pigs generally shy nocturnal animals sheltering through the day making it hard to accurately estimate numbers 4 www.qmdc.org.au

  5. Ecology • Natural spread of pigs along watercourses depends on good seasons and has largely occurred in last 50 -100 g g y years • Pigs have high energy and protein requirements, which are not available all year round – reason they often hit agricultural crops. i lt l • The need for them to move and find these food requirements is a weakness in their ecology that can be exploited for management purposes. l it d f t • Omnivorous and extremely opportunistic. Prefer green feed and will eat crops, They root extensively for tubers, worms and soil invertebrates worms and soil invertebrates. Will prey on small animals Will prey on small animals and eggs. Stock losses occur primarily with lambs and goat kids. 5 www.qmdc.org.au

  6. 6 Where are they? y www.qmdc.org.au

  7. 7 In Queensland www.qmdc.org.au

  8. Control Techniques Control Techniques q • Ground shooting • Hunting H ti • Aerial shooting • Trapping • Fencing Fencing • Poisoning (ground & aerial) 8 www.qmdc.org.au

  9. Ground Shooting/ Hunting Ground Shooting/ Hunting • Opportunistic or planned • Use dogs to find/hunt pigs U d t fi d/h t i • Dispatch with rifles, knives • Bowhunting 9 www.qmdc.org.au

  10. Is Is recreational/commercial recreational/commercial hunting effective at control? hunting effective at control? – Usually hunt in high density areas only – Success is group-size dependant – Hunters very selective in animals they remove – Introduction of pigs into other areas? – BUT – can be a significant help?? 10 www.qmdc.org.au

  11. Do harvesters have an effect 11 on feral pig populations l ti i l f www.qmdc.org.au

  12. 12 TRAPPING www.qmdc.org.au

  13. Trapping Trapping Advantages • Economical – Flexible, can be incorporated into normal farm activities – Traps can be re-used Traps can be re used – Cost of traps offset by selling animals • Doesn’t interfere with normal behaviour • Takes advantage of opportunities • Safest form of control – good for settled areas 13 www.qmdc.org.au

  14. Trapping Trapping Disadvantages • Must be checked regularly • Labour intensive to construct and maintain • Labour intensive to construct and maintain • Not suitable for large scale use • Success dependant on food availability Success dependant on food availability • Bias? 14 www.qmdc.org.au

  15. 15 Trap Designs g p www.qmdc.org.au

  16. Trapping Trapping Side-hinged door Side hinged door Many triggers available – but “pig-trigger” works 16 www.qmdc.org.au

  17. 17 Where in the Landscape to Position Traps www.qmdc.org.au

  18. Poisoning Poisoning • Great for removing bulk of population with the least amount of effort • Ground or aerial baiting • Ground – 1080 grain/meat – Phosphorus • Aerial Aerial – 1080 meat 18 www.qmdc.org.au

  19. Poisoning Poisoning Advantages Advantages • Widely accepted • Fast and effective • Fast and effective • Cheap!! Disadvantages • Best result with free-feeding Best result with free feeding • Non-target risks 19 www.qmdc.org.au

  20. 20 www.qmdc.org.au

  21. 21 www.qmdc.org.au

  22. Aerial Shooting Aerial Shooting Use a helicopter, usually small and nimble e.g. R22 Use where pigs are in inaccessible areas, poisoning and/or where pre-feeding isn’t an option ti 22 www.qmdc.org.au

  23. Aerial Shooting Aerial Shooting Advantages Advantages – Access to most areas during most times Access to most areas during most times Access to most areas during most times Access to most areas during most times – Rapid knockdown Rapid knockdown – Can be used over large areas Can be used over large areas Can be used over large areas Can be used over large areas – Cost is reasonable Cost is reasonable Disadvantages Disadvantages – Can disperse pigs – Can disperse pigs Can disperse pigs Can disperse pigs – Costs increase as density decreases Costs increase as density decreases – Not applicable to all areas/situations Not applicable to all areas/situations Not applicable to all areas/situations Not applicable to all areas/situations 23 www.qmdc.org.au

  24. 24 www.qmdc.org.au

  25. A broad scale control program with landholders whilst undertaking solid landholders whilst undertaking solid research to inform our future investment into feral animals investment into feral animals. 25 www.qmdc.org.au

  26. Components of the project • Initial feral pig density surveys • Research to influence land managers – Damage to Production – Damage to Biodiversity – Disease Spread – GPS and Radio Collaring GPS and Radio Collaring • On ground control techniques • Monitoring • Monitoring – Ongoing feral pig density surveys surveys 26 www.qmdc.org.au

  27. 27 www.qmdc.org.au

  28. Feral pig density surveys Aerial Survey’s – Nov 07 Mar 08 Aug 08 Nov 08 Apr 09 Aug 09 Nov 09 Apr 10 Aerial Survey s – Nov 07, Mar 08, Aug 08, Nov 08, Apr 09, Aug 09, Nov 09, Apr 10. 28 www.qmdc.org.au

  29. 29 Approx 1 feral pig per square km www.qmdc.org.au

  30. How do we coordinate control of feral pigs dogs foxes and cats feral pigs, dogs, foxes and cats Baiting, Trapping, Commercial Harvesting, Aerial Shooting, Recreational Shooting 30 www.qmdc.org.au

  31. Green - Free fed and baited Yellow -Free fed. No uptake, no bait required b it i d Red - Not free fed. Not baited ‘Hog gone’ trial with IACRC June 2010 June 2010 31 www.qmdc.org.au

  32. Overcoming challenges for control t l • Coordinated control over a large enough • Coordinated control over a large enough area to have an impact on numbers. • Formation of syndicate groups for baiting Formation of syndicate groups for baiting programs. • Increased trap use. • Do harvesters have an impact on ferals. 32 www.qmdc.org.au

  33. Research Damage to Production Damage to Biodiversity Disease Spread Disease Spread GPS and Radio Collaring 33 www.qmdc.org.au

  34. Agricultural Impacts Agricultural Impacts – Damage to grain, cane, fruit and vegetable crops – Damage to pastures and competition with grazing animals Damage to pastures and competition with grazing animals – Lamb predation – Damage to fences, water sources 34 www.qmdc.org.au

  35. Determine the cost of feral pig damage to crop production Chick pea damage at planting Forage Sorghum damage 35 www.qmdc.org.au

  36. P Preliminary findings of Sorghum Damage. li i fi di f S h D • 23 paddocks totalling 5272 ha assessed • 0.1 – 5.6% damage g Mean $19/ha lost to feral pigs • • Assuming this is representative Assuming this is representative – Queensland • 545,000 ha sorghum, ~$10 million • Even at low feral pig numbers, damage still considerable Even at low feral pig numbers, damage still considerable • Control is quite cheap!! Control is quite cheap!! = Control is worthwhile! = Control is worthwhile! • 36 www.qmdc.org.au

  37. Biodiversity Impact • 113 fox stomachs and 113 f t h d • 53 cat stomachs. • Over 70 feral pig stomachs being analysed. g y FOX % of Stomachs CAT 94% 94% Mice Mice 87% 87% 7% Bird 23% 37% Invertebrate 28% 4% Dasyurid 15% 1% Dragon sp. 4% 4.4% Frog 0% 0% Rat 0% 7% Lagomorph 2% 37 23% Carrion 0% www.qmdc.org.au

  38. Disease Spread • Sydney University PhD student looking at the interaction between feral pigs and Domestic Piggeries • • Also testing for disease that may be Also testing for disease that may be transferred to humans or stock (leptospirosis, Brucellosis) Of 33 pigs shot last week 15 infected with • l leptospirosis and 2 with brucellosis t i i d 2 ith b ll i 38 www.qmdc.org.au

Recommend


More recommend