FACILITY COMMITTEE PRESENTATION April 05, 2018 1 INITIAL BUDGET - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

QUAKERTOWN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT NEIDIG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL additions and renovations FACILITY COMMITTEE PRESENTATION April 05, 2018 1

INITIAL BUDGET PFAFF ES PROGRAM COMPARISON TOWNSHIP MEETINGS CURRENT OPTIONS CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES OPTION COMPARISONS NEXT STEPS 2

INITIAL BUDGET PFAFF ES PROGRAM COMPARISON TOWNSHIP MEETINGS CURRENT OPTIONS CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES OPTION COMPARISONS NEXT STEPS 3

ORIGINAL FACILITY STUDY REPORT SUMMARY ESTIMATED COSTS – from Section 7 Orig. BUILDING Last Est. Soft Costs TOTAL COSTS Const Renov. Const. Costs (@ 30 %) Haycock Elementary School 1955 1983 $ 3,258,275 $ 977,483 $ 4,235,758 Neidig Elementary School 1959 1986 $ 8,030,119 $ 2,409,036 $ 10,439,155 Pfaff Elementary School 2005 $ 764,978 $ 229,493 $ 994,471 Quakertown Elementary School 1928 1967 $ 10,452,200 $ 3,135,660 $ 13,587,860 2009 Richland Elementary School 1957 $ 926,624 $ 277,987 $ 1,204,611 Tohickon Valley Elem School 1950 2000 $ 8,415,969 $ 2,524,791 $ 10,940,760 Trumbauersville Elem School 1998 $ 3,239,134 $ 971,740 $ 4,210,874 Milford Middle School 1974 $ 8,412,746 $ 2,523,824 $ 10,936,570 Strayer Middle School 2004 $ 935,959 $ 280,788 $ 1,216,747 Freshman Center 1965 2005 $ 4,649,032 $ 1,394,710 $ 6,043,742 High School 1954 ongoing $ - $ - $ - Alumni Field $ 640,224 $ 192,067 $ 832,291 Garage & Utilities Building $ 691,772 $ 207,532 $ 899,304 District Admin Building $ 385,900 $ 115,770 $ 501,670 TOTALS $ 50,802,932 $15,240,880 $ 66,043,812 4

RE-DISTRICTING FACILITY RECOMMENDATION 5

6

INITIAL BUDGET PFAFF ES PROGRAM COMPARISON TOWNSHIP MEETINGS CURRENT OPTIONS CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES OPTION COMPARISONS NEXT STEPS 7

APPLES TO ORANGE COMPARISON - EXISTING Existing Total s.f. 85,000 s.f. 45,764 s.f. Existing Student Capacity 600 students 434 students 8

EXISTING PFAFF ES FLOOR PLAN BUILDING AREA: 85,000 s.f. CAPACITY: 600 students 9

PROPOSED NEIDIG ES PROGRAM 10

PROGRAM COMPARISON – when complete PFAFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BUILDING AREA 85,000 s.f. STUDENT CAPACITY 600 students AREA PER STUDENT 141 s.f. per student PROPOSED NEIDIG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROGRAM BUILDING AREA 87,516 s.f. STUDENT CAPACITY 600 students AREA PER STUDENT 145 s.f. per student 11

INITIAL BUDGET PFAFF ES PROGRAM COMPARISON TOWNSHIP MEETINGS CURRENT OPTIONS CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES OPTION COMPARISONS NEXT STEPS 12

TOWNSHIP MEETINGS RICHLAND TOWNSHIP (held March 13, 2018)  Suggested thinking long term and looking at the project for the 40 year life cycle it will support  In-depth discussion about bus and car circulation patterns on site (from two different sides)  Interested in thinking strategically about the property line between Township and Borough  Willing to cede approval process to Quakertown Borough and Borough ordinances if building development on Township side is less QUAKERTOWN BOROUGH (Joint meeting held March 20, 2018)  In-depth discussion about bus and car circulation patterns on site (from two different sides) Interested in thinking strategically about the property line between Township and Borough   More discussion about the process by which approval could be granted through the Borough 13

INITIAL BUDGET PFAFF ES PROGRAM COMPARISON TOWNSHIP MEETINGS CURRENT OPTIONS CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES OPTION COMPARISONS NEXT STEPS 14

EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN 15

EXISTING CONDITIONS BUILDING AREA: 45,764 s.f. CAPACITY: 434 students FLOOR PLAN 16 16

OPTION A SITE PLAN 17

OPTION A FIRST FLOOR 18

OPTION A SECOND FLOOR 19

OPTION B SITE PLAN 20

OPTION B FIRST FLOOR AREA OF ADDITIONAL COST 21

OPTION B SECOND FLOOR AREA OF ADDITIONAL COST 22

OPTION C SITE PLAN 23

OPTION C FIRST FLOOR 24

OPTION C SECOND FLOOR 25

INITIAL BUDGET PFAFF ES PROGRAM COMPARISON TOWNSHIP MEETINGS CURRENT OPTIONS CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES OPTION COMPARISONS NEXT STEPS 26

OPTION A BUDGET 27

28

29

OPTION B BUDGET 30

31

32

OPTION C BUDGET 33

34

35

INITIAL BUDGET PFAFF ES PROGRAM COMPARISON TOWNSHIP MEETINGS CURRENT OPTIONS CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES OPTION COMPARISONS NEXT STEPS 36

OPTION COMPARISONS OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C ? ? ? 1 STAFF F FF FEEDBA BACK EITHER/NO YES NO 2 MORE U E URBAN “F “FEE EEL ” EITHER/YES NO 3 MORE RE S SUBURBA RBAN “ “FEEL” YES 4 GREA EATER ER V VOLUM UME OF P PAREN ENT D DROP-OFF FF EITHER/YES NO YES FROM ER ERIE A E AVEN ENUE 5 GREA EATER ER V VOLUM UME OF P PAREN ENT D DROP-OFF FF EITHER/NO YES NO FROM P PEN ENROSE A E AVEN ENUE HIGH 6 IMPACT O ON FLOOD P PLAIN IN LOW MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW MEDIUM 7 VARIA IANCE/APPR PPROVAL R RISK HIGH LOW MEDIUM 8 IMPACT O ON SCHED EDUL ULE MEDIUM MIDDLE HIGH 9 COS OST 10 10 PLAYGROUND ND S SAFETY TY TBD TBD TBD 37

INITIAL BUDGET PFAFF ES PROGRAM COMPARISON TOWNSHIP MEETINGS CURRENT OPTIONS CURRENT BUDGET ESTIMATES OPTION COMPARISONS NEXT STEPS 38

NEXT STEPS 1. DECIDE ON A SOLUTION TO PURSUE 2. DESIGN SCHEDULE PROCESS SHOWN ON THE FOLLOWING SLIDES WILL VARY DEPENDING ON DECISION TIME AND BASED ON APPROVAL PROCESS FOR SELECTED OPTION 3. APPROVAL PROCESS a. Site/Land Development Approval Process i. Township/Borough Planning ii.Township/Borough Zoning iii.Township/ Borough Supervisors/Commissioners iv.County Conservation District v.County Planning b. Plancon Process c. Code Review and Approval 39

40

41

42

Note: If a decision about the option to pursue is longer than shown in this schedule, the project schedule will extend. Also, each option has the potential for different approval lengths which can also alter the completion date. 43