education
play

EDUCATION 3/10/2014 Facility Committee Committee Members - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FACILITIES COMMITTEE PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION 3/10/2014 Facility Committee Committee Members Kristine Chalifoux Amy Lozar Lynn Stuckey Arlene Vespa Mark Ritz Ex Officio Avona Greene PJ Trautman


  1. FACILITIES COMMITTEE PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION 3/10/2014

  2. Facility Committee Committee Members • Kristine Chalifoux • Amy Lozar • Lynn Stuckey Arlene Vespa Mark Ritz – Ex Officio • • Avona Greene PJ Trautman • • • Bruce Knight • Mike Somers • Catherine Mannen • Cedric Jones Participants Dan McCall Jill Trentz • • Daniel Bechtel Heather Ochs • • • Elizabeth Stegmaier • Heather Owen • Holly Nelson • Thomas Lockman • Joan E. Dykstra • William Taylor John Ayers • John Currey •

  3. AGENDA • Where We Began • Charge of the Facilities Committee • Process • Scenarios Modeled • Recommendations • Questions?

  4. Where We Began • DeJong Richter Study DeJong Richter Study

  5. CHARGE of the Facilities Committee Consider options for each of the facilities included in this analysis and develop a recommended facilities plan, based on Facility Committee input and a cost/benefit analysis, to present to the Board of Education.

  6. Facilities Included Central High School • • Centennial High School • Dr. Howard Elementary • South Side Elementary Kirby Avenue Elementary • Edison Middle • • Franklin Middle • Jefferson Middle

  7. PROCESS Presentation to the Board of Education 3/10/2014

  8. Master plan modeling and analysis

  9. NEEDS ASSESSMENT Educational Physical Needs Needs

  10. PHYSICAL NEEDS What is the physical condition of the building? • Infrastructure / Systems • Interior Environmental Quality • Operation and Maintenance Costs • Energy Efficiency • Safety / Security • Technology

  11. EDUCATIONAL ADEQUACY Does the learning environment support the educational program?* • School Site • Structural and Mechanical Features • Plant Maintainability • Safety and Security • Educational Adequacy • Environment for Education * Determined by the standards as defined in the Strategic Plan (Great Schools Together).

  12. SCENARIO Building A Building B Building C Building A Building B Building C Remodel Addition Repurpose Retire New OPTIONS

  13. Life Cycle Educational Costs Adequacy (including first costs, energy costs, O&M costs, and renewal costs) COST/BENEFIT comparison

  14. • Brainstorming 10/17/13 • Revisions/Edits 10/24/13 • Presented QLEO results, Revised 11/14/13 Scenarios • Administrative research on K-8 11/2013 configuration 2/20/14 • Cost Benefit Analysis/Develop Final Recommendations

  15. Projected Enrollments 2022-2023 projected* K-5: 4780 6-8: 2244 9-12: 3207 *DeJong Richter projected enrollment data

  16. SCENARIOS Modeled Presentation to the Board of Education 3/10/2014

  17. October 17, 2013 Scenario Name Description Scenario 1 New Dr. Howard, K-8 at Barkstall, Central as Edison & Career Prep Scenario 2 Reuse Edison by remodeling Scenario 3 Single high school, do not reuse Central Scenario 4 Reuse Edison and Dr. Howard, build 4 th middle school Scenario 5 Career prep at each high school Scenario 6 Maintain current sites by remodeling and replacing Central in the same location Scenario 7 Create 2 K-8 models Scenario 8 All new work creates K-8 elementary schools Scenario 9 Reduce to 2 middle schools and create more K-8, centralize district functions at Central Scenario 10 Focus on high priority maintenance Scenario 11 Make Central a K-8 and curriculum center

  18. November 14, 2013 • Eliminated Scenarios: 2, 3, 4, 6, 10,11

  19. November 14, 2013 • Added Scenarios: 12, 13, 14, 15 Scenario Name Description Scenario 12 3 middle schools, no K-8 Scenario 13 4 middle schools, no K-8 Scenario 14 4 middle schools, renovate Edison Scenario 15 4 middle schools, renovate existing, minimum work

  20. Nov 2013 – Jan 2014 • District Explored K-8 PROS • Fewer transitions for students Could provide a smaller school environment depending on the number of grade level strands • • Allow current middle schools to reduce overall enrollment and provide relief from overcrowding • Provides an option for students and families, similar to what we do now with having balanced calendar LIMITATIONS • May not be able to provide as many opportunities in encore areas (e.g. instrumental music) and in extra- curricular activities Certification issues with middle level teachers • • Bussing – will younger students be expected to be on the bus with the older students • Would need to have a building administrator that has experience with primary (grades K-2) and middle level • Professional development at the building level would need to be carefully planned to address the grade level range and needs of teachers and staff members Facility modifications may be required to address middle school level curriculum needs if an existing K-5 • elementary building is converted to K-8. If a new facility is built for K-8 or an existing building is renovated in the future for this population, these needs can be included in the upfront programming of the facility. RECOMMENDATIONS As the Board considers future facilities, this grade configuration should be taken into consideration. It is not • recommended that the District go with one or the other, but provide the K-8 as an option for families, similar to how balanced calendar is currently provided.

  21. FINAL SCENARIOS Presentation to the Board of Education 3/10/2014

  22. SCENARIO 1 3 Middle Schools + 1 K-8 $55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $267,313,747 DO NO THING REPURPOSE NEW ADDITION RETIRE RENOVATE

  23. SCENARIO 5 3 Middle Schools + 1 K-8 DO NO THING REPURPOSE NEW ADDITION RETIRE RENOVATE

  24. SCENARIO 8 3 Middle Schools + 1 K-8 $55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $286,516,233 DO NO THING REPURPOSE NEW ADDITION RETIRE RENOVATE

  25. SCENARIO 9 2 Middle Schools + 4 K-8 $55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $298,074,086 DO NO THING REPURPOSE NEW ADDITION RETIRE RENOVATE

  26. SCENARIO 12 3 Middle Schools $55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $257,360,739 DO NO THING REPURPOSE NEW ADDITION RETIRE RENOVATE

  27. SCENARIO 13 4 Middle Schools $55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $274,382,120 DO NO THING REPURPOSE NEW ADDITION RETIRE RENOVATE

  28. SCENARIO 14 4 Middle Schools $55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $264,926,406 DO NO THING REPURPOSE NEW ADDITION RETIRE RENOVATE

  29. SCENARIO 15 4 Middle Schools DO NO THING REPURPOSE NEW ADDITION RETIRE RENOVATE

  30. Final Scenarios

  31. Final Scenarios

  32. THANK YOU QUESTIONS? Presentation to the Board of Education 3/10/2014

Recommend


More recommend