facilities scope study
play

FACILITIES SCOPE STUDY BOARD OF EDUCATION WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION FACILITIES SCOPE STUDY BOARD OF EDUCATION WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2006 AGENDA PRESENTERS TOPICS Marjorie Lohnes FACILITIES REVIEW Kate Engel SCOPE STUDY Peter Winebrenner, BSA+A Architects


  1. CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION FACILITIES SCOPE STUDY BOARD OF EDUCATION WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2006

  2. AGENDA PRESENTERS TOPICS • Marjorie Lohnes • FACILITIES REVIEW • Kate Engel • SCOPE STUDY • Peter Winebrenner, BSA+A Architects • Board and Panel • QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION

  3. THE FUTURE of CAREER and TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION for CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

  4. LABOR MARKET DEMANDS JOB SKILL LEVELS 1991 1950 Unskilled Unskilled 20% 20% 35% Skilled Skilled 20% 60% 45% Professional Professional 2000 FUTURE Unskilled Unskilled 10% 15% 15% 20% Skilled Skilled 65% 75% Professional Professional

  5. FACTS FOR CONSIDERATION • CTE programs keep students engaged, preventing dropout through relevance in instruction • Jobs in career-tech fields are among the fastest growing in the nation • New CTE programming has fueled a national surge in enrollment from 9.6 million in 1999 to 15.1 million in 2004 • CTE is for all students and should have a representative cross section of the student population in its programs

  6. CURRENT CCCTC PROGRAMS • Project Lead the Way • Allied Health Career • Textiles & Fabrics • Machine Technology • Emergency Services • Automotive Technology Tech (off-site) • Collision Repair • Cosmetology • Diesel Technology • Culinary Arts • HVAC • Floral Design • Carpentry • Video Production • Masonry • Print Production • Electrical • Computer Technology • Landscaping • Drafting • Technical Support • Welding Networking

  7. HIGH INTEREST HIGH TECH PROGRAMS CURRENT OFFERINGS PROGRAMS TO BE CONSIDERED • Allied Health Careers • Electronics/Telecom • Computer Tech (AP) munications • Engineering (PLTW) • Homeland Security • Print and Video • Oracle (database) Production • Biotechnology • Technical Support and Networking • Computer Game (Cisco) Design

  8. CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION FACILITIES SUCCESSFUL CTE PROGRAMS IMPACT ECOMONY

  9. History of Career and Technology Centers • 1967 - Vocational Center at the new SCHS 9 vocational Programs (capacity 180 per session) • 1971 - Carroll County Vocational- Technical Center opens for students from four area high schools (WHS, FSK, NCHS, SCHS) 17 vocational programs (capacity 340 per session) Classroom space based on 20% theory • 1986 - Expansion at CCVT – 2 additional programs ( Diesel & HVAC) (capacity 380 per session)

  10. Enrollment (CCCTC) • 1970 - 1984: 550+ • 1985 - 1994: 460+ --enrollment decline • 1991 – Name change to Career & Technology Center • 1990 – 1996 – decline in enrollment closed programs at South Carroll – Avg. Enrollment - 425 • 1995 – lowest enrollment at CCCTC = 379 • 1996 – 586, change in schedule/change in programs • 1997 – 762 • 1998 - 2001 – 850+, continued to update programs • 2002 - 2004 - 900

  11. Present • Enrollment at CCCTC is 1100+ • Extended day 7:45 - 4 p.m • Offer 24 programs, including multiple sections of several programs (culinary arts, engineering, auto service technology and allied health careers) • SCCTC offers 3 programs w/ enrollment 130+ • Graduated 538 seniors in 2006 • 250+ business partners support programs

  12. Certification Results • Project-Lead-the-Way and National Automotive Technicians Education Foundation (NATEF) certification teams cited: • Inadequate facilities • Failure to attract non-traditional students

  13. Future • Current facility and structure limits opening new programs • New technologies require specialized infrastructure • Classroom space limits academic support and integration • Successful CTE programs impact economy

  14. 2002 Comprehensive Career & Technology Program & Facilities Plan • Support State-wide Completer Program • CTE requires specialized facilities • Consolidate CTE from SCHS to CCCTC • Business courses taught at home schools • Increased interest and demand for CTE • High workforce demand

  15. SCOPE STUDY PROCESS • Existing Facility Review / Assessment • Program Review • Development of Options • Cost Model • Option Evaluation & Selection • Final Report

  16. EX EXISTING ISTING SI SITE TE

  17. EX EXISTING ISTING BU BUIL ILDING DING

  18. EXISTING FACILITY DEFICIENCIES Physical: • All systems (HVAC, Plumbing, Elec., Etc.) need to be replaced • Roof needs to be replaced • Exterior skin needs to be repaired • Exterior windows & doors need to be replaced • Interior doors need to be replaced • Finishes need to be replaced • Casework & Furnishings need to be replaced • Equipment needs to be replaced • Various Site repairs / replacements • Full Building, Life Safety & ADA Compliance

  19. EXISTING FACILITY DEFICIENCIES Functional: • Many instructional spaces are too small • Some program elements not present • Functional adjacencies are not optimal • Trades are not clustered optimally • Existing building components restrict optimal program delivery: • Ceiling heights • Floor level changes • Interior wall locations • Building infrastructure / core locations • Site features

  20. CCCTC Facility Profile Exist. Current Proposed Enroll. Capacity Enroll. 380 600* 750** * Maximum number of students in building, based on 11am count ** Assumes SCHS CTE programs move to CCCTC; includes 60 SCHS students

  21. CCCTC PROGRAM Exist. Proposed Administration 8,460 10,200 Shared Resources 4,864 13,950 Health & Human Serv. 18,788 31,940 Info. Technology 12,068 14,640 Engineering 7,836 16,290 Transportation 27,753 34,640 Construction 22,684 34,440 Total Net SF 102,453 156,100 TOTAL GSF 129,000 210,000

  22. Maryland CTE Facility Comparison Prev. Proposed GSF Capacity County GSF Worcester 70,000 140,000 600 Calvert 69,000 138,000 500 St. Mary’s 75,000 130,000 600 Dorchester 50,600 94,000 360 CARROLL 129,000 210,000 750 (These CTE facilities were recently completed or are currently in design / under construction in the State.)

  23. OPTIONS Option A – Expand & Renovate Existing Facility Option B – New 3-story Facility on WHS Site Option C – New 2-story Facility on New Site

  24. OP OPTION TION A A - SITE SITE

  25. OP OPTION TION A A - BU BUIL ILDING DING

  26. OP OPTION TION B B - SITE SITE

  27. OP OPTION TION B B – BU BUIL ILDING DING – GR GRND. ND.

  28. DING – 1 st st OP OPTION TION B B – BU BUIL ILDING Fl. Fl.

  29. DING – 2 nd nd OP OPTION TION B B – BU BUIL ILDING Fl. Fl.

  30. DING – 1 st st OP OPTION TION C C – BU BUIL ILDING Fl. Fl.

  31. DING – 2 nd nd OP OPTION TION C C – BU BUIL ILDING Fl. Fl.

  32. COS OSTS Option Constr. Other* Soft Total A $49.9m $16.6m $12.7m $79.2m .2m B $51.7m $13.6m $13.4m $78.7m .7m C $51.7m $15.4m $13.5m $80.6m .6m * “Other” includes escalation, contingency, phasing, temporary facilities, additional site work and utilities.

  33. COS OSTS S - DE DETAIL AILED ED Option A Option B Option C R ENOVATE / COSTS Comments EXPAND NEW FACILITY NEW FACILITY ON EXISTING ON WHS SITE NEW SITE BASE CAPITAL COSTS 1,150,000 $10/sf Demolition 440,000 1,150,000 R enovation 15,265,000 0 0 $215/sf 45,150,000 $215/sf Addition/New Construction 29,885,000 45,150,000 Building Construction Costs 45,590,000 46,300,000 46,300,000 0 5% Site Construction - R enov. 763,250 0 5,418,000 12% Site Construction - New 3,586,200 5,418,000 Total Site Costs 4,349,450 5,418,000 5,418,000 Total Base Capital Costs 49,939,450 51,718,000 51,718,000 OTHER CAPITAL COSTS 2,585,900 5% Contingency 2,496,973 2,585,900 0 10% P hasing 4,559,000 0 Temporary Facilities 320,000 0 0 Portables at $40K 0 Staduim, Pkg. Additional Site Work 0 2,000,000 3,000,000 60 acres Land Acquisition 0 0 1,000,000 New Site Utilities Land/Infrastructure 0 0 8,848,624 8% per year, 2 yr. Escalation 9,170,468 9,008,624 Other Capital Costs 16,546,440 13,594,524 15,434,524 TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS 66,485,890 65,312,524 67,152,524 SOFT COSTS 6,206,160 12% FFE 5,992,734 6,206,160 3,361,670 6.5% A/E Fees 3,246,064 3,361,670 CM Fees 2,996,367 3,103,080 3,103,080 6% Additional Surveys & Fees 0 200,000 300,000 517,180 1% Misc. 499,395 517,180 Total Soft Costs 12,734,560 13,388,090 13,488,090 TOTAL PR OJ ECT COSTS 79,220,450 78,700,614 80,640,614

  34. CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION EXTRA SLIDES

  35. CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAMS PAST PRESENT AND FUTURE

  36. HISTORICAL TRADITION VOCATIONAL EDUCATION • Mandated by Smith-Hughes Act of 1917 • Created to transition from an agrarian to an industrial economy • Separate system to meet needs of business and industry • Excluded academic curriculum • Division was created between practical and theoretical education in schools

  37. MISSION STATEMENT The mission for the system of career and technology education for Carroll County is to prepare learners to begin careers and pursue lifelong learning through a process of career development, academic instruction, specific technical skills development, and work experience in order to meet individual needs and the workforce preparation and economic development needs of Carroll County, the region and the global economy.

  38. CURRENT ISSUES AND RESPONSES

Recommend


More recommend