dr leah oxenford cees crew 2016 university of oklahoma
play

Dr. Leah Oxenford CEES CREW (2016) University of Oklahoma - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dr. Leah Oxenford CEES CREW (2016) University of Oklahoma PHYSICAL CHEMICAL Neutralize acidity Design treatment cells to direct and indirect optimize hydrology: Metals removal and retention Storage / Surface Area


  1. Dr. Leah Oxenford CEES – CREW (2016) University of Oklahoma

  2. PHYSICAL CHEMICAL  Neutralize acidity  Design treatment cells to direct and indirect optimize hydrology:  Metals removal and retention • Storage / Surface Area oxidation / reduction ppt / sedimentation • Hydraulic Retention Time  Alkalinity generation • Elevation Change / Aeration

  3. ACUTE (SHORT TERM) CHRONIC (LONG TERM)  Direct precipitation  Changes in loading  Surface runoff (system)  Erosion of berms  Storm Drainage  Field work schedules  Construction Schedule  Remote monitoring

  4. ACUTE:  To determine the relationship for rainfall intensity and total iron transport between the oxidative cells of a passive treatment system. CHRONIC:  Determine the significance of storm induced mass transport seasonally and annually with respect to baseline transport.

  5. SAMPLING / MONITORING DATA INTERPRETATION  10 years of storm data  40 storms sampled over a evaluated for sampling three year period. threshold values.  Intensity classification:  Precipitation (yield) • Low (0.25-0.99 cm/hr)  Duration (hours) • Moderate (1.00-1.99 cm/hr)  Frequency (#) • High (2.00-2.99 cm/hr)  Intensity (yield / hour) • Extreme (>3.00 cm/hr)

  6.  Storm Classification

  7.  Autosamplers collect 24 samples with local rainfall intensity trigger and monitoring.  Samples processed and analyzed for total metals.

  8. C1Out: Average Moderate Iron Transport Profile (0.253; 1.47 cm/hr) 39.98 1.98 Iron Rainfall Intensity 34.98 Rainfall Intensity (cm/hr) 29.98 1.48 [Fe] Tranport (ppm) 24.98 19.98 0.98 14.98 9.98 0.48 4.98 -0.02 -0.02 -0.5 4.5 9.5 14.5 19.5 24.5 29.5 34.5 Time (hours)

  9. The amount of iron transported does not correlate to rainfall intensity, duration, or storm yield. Rainfall events induced significant iron transport over baseline during the 30+ hour monitoring period.

  10. Storm Induced % of Transport Loading Fe Total Transported Fe Transport Storm Induced (kg/year) Fe (kg/year) (kg/year) (%Net Transport) C1Out 34767 7862 1067 13.6% C2N 7862 1220 165 13.5% C2S 7862 1019 113 11.1% 301 152 49 34.8% C6Out

  11. RESUSPENSION SETTLING DISRUPTION  Not likely due to depth of  Iron transport peaks ~15 treatment cell (>1.5m) hours after a rainfall event.  No observable trend  Floc fragmentation and between transport and mixing of surface zone. intensity.  Settling disruption  Resuspension is not supported by Stokes Law supported. calculations.

  12.  Storms transport Fe between cells in the oxidation unit independent of rain fall intensity, duration, and yield.  Storms do not induce export of Fe from the treatment system due to oxidative cell placement early in the treatment series.

  13.  There is no significant difference between seasons for storm induced iron transport.  There is no significant difference between years and storm induced iron transport.  Transport mechanism is disrupted sedimentation rather than resuspension

  14.  Impact of the temporal distribution of storms on mass transport. • # of storms per transport event • # and frequency of storms preceding event  Transport profiles for trace metals • (Cd, Pb, Zn, and more) • Correlation to iron via surface sorption

  15.  OU  Committee  Nairn  Crew  Funding

Recommend


More recommend