Domain Walls in Gapped Graphene Gordon W. Semenoff University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Domain Walls in Gapped Graphene Gordon W. Semenoff University of British Columbia Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008 Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Graphene is a 2-dimensional array of carbon atoms with a hexagonal lattice structure Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Electron spectrum Band structure and linear dispersion relation E ( � k ) = ¯ hv F | k | P. R. Wallace, Phys. Rev. 71, 622 (1947) J. C. Slonczewsi and P. R. Weiss, Phys. Rev. 109, 272 (1958). Dirac equation G. W. S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2449 (1984) For many years Graphene was a hypothetical material Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Graphene was produced and identified in the laboratory in 2004 Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

A carbon atom has four valence electrons. Three of these electrons form strong covalent σ -bonds with neighboring atoms. The fourth, π -orbital is un-paired. Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Tight-binding model hexagonal lattice = two triangular sub-lattices � A and � B connected by vectors � s 1 ,� s 2 ,� s 3 . � A + t ∗ a † � � t b † H = s i a � A b � � � A + � s i A + � � A,i Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Tight-binding model � A + t ∗ a † � � t b † H = s i a � A b � � � A + � s i A + � � A,i hda � hdb � � dt = t ∗ � A B i ¯ = t b � s i , i ¯ a � A + � B − � s i dt i i h t + i� h t + i� k · � k · � A = e i E B = e − i E A a 0 , B b 0 a � b � ¯ ¯ � a 0 � � a 0 i e i� k · � s i t � � � 0 � E = i e − i� t ∗ � k · � s i b 0 b 0 0 √ � (1 + 2 cos( 3 k y )) 2 + sin 2 ( 3 k y 3 k x π -bands E ( k ) = ±| t | 2 ) cos( 2 ) 2 Degeneracy points √ √ 3 k y 3 k y cos(3 k x 2 ) = − 1 sin( ) = 0 → cos( ) = 1 , 2 2 2 √ √ 3 k y 3 k y cos(3 k x 2 ) = 1 sin( ) = 0 → cos( ) = − 1 , 2 2 2 Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Band structure of graphene Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Linearize spectrum near degeneracy points hv F | � E ( k ) = ¯ k | v F ∼ 10 6 m/s ∼ c/ 300, good up to ∼ 1 ev 0 k x − ik y   0 k x + ik y 0 H Dirac = ¯ hv F   0 k x + ik y   0 k x − ik y 0 Massless electrons seen experimentally Shubnikov-de-Haas oscillations K. S. Novoselov et. al. Nature 438, 197 (2005) Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

B = � ∂ × � Minimal coupling to magnetic field: A ∂ → � � D = � ∂ + i � A 0 − iD x − D y   0 − iD x + D y 0 H Dirac =   0 − iD x + D y   0 − iD x − D y 0 Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem � 1 � d 2 xB ( x ) � � Number of zero modes = 2(2) � 2 π In the neutral ground state of graphene, half of zero modes are filled. G. W. S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2449 (1984) Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

B = � ∂ × � Minimal coupling to magnetic field: A ∂ → � � D = � ∂ + i � A 0 − iD x − D y   0 − iD x + D y 0 H Dirac =   0 − iD x + D y   0 − iD x − D y 0 Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem � 1 � d 2 xB ( x ) � � Number of zero modes = 2(2) � 2 π In the neutral ground state of graphene, half of zero modes are filled. G. W. S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2449 (1984) Confirmed by the Quantum Hall Effect in graphene Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

K. Novoselov et. al. Nature 438, 197 (2005) Y. Zhang et. al. Nature 438, 201 (2005) σ xy = 4 e 2 n + 1 � � h 2 Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Relativistic Quantum Field Theory • “Zitterwebegung” ↔ minimum conductivity of graphene 4 e 2 h • “Klein paradox” ↔ unsuppressed tunneling through barrier • “Schwinger effect” – tunneling production of e + - e − pairs by electric field • Curvature of space ↔ Corrugation of graphene = pseudovector gauge field • Dynamical issues – chiral symmetry breaking • Mass condensates − → deformations of graphene lattice − → fractionally charged vortices Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Graphene for electronic devices • Graphene has a very large carrier mobility 50 , 000 cm 2 /V s • can carry huge current densities 10 8 Amp/cm 2 ∼ 100 × copper • Electrons travel ballistically over sales of 1 µ m. • Suppressed weak localization (due to corrugations). • For electronics applications a mass gap is needed (like a conventional semiconductor) Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Klein Effect O. Klein, Z. Phys. 33, 157 (1929) M. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov and A. Geim, Nature Physics 2, 620 (2006) Unsuppressed tunneling through a potential barrier (attempts to observe in QED in collisions of large Z nuclei) Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Gapping the spectrum • Use geometry – graphene quantum dot • Sublattice symmetry breaking by substrate: deposition on silicon carbide (Lanzara et.al. Berkeley) • Multi-layer graphene. • “Graphane” • Boron-Nitride has same lattice and valence electron dansity but a staggered chemical potential µ ∼ 4 . 5 ev – compare with t ∼ 2 . 7 ev . • Graphene layer on top of Boron Nitride. Gap ∼ 50 mev . Lattice constants differ by 1.5 percent. Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Gapping the Dirac spectrum in graphene • parity preserving masses from staggered chemical potential G. W. S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2449 (1984) � � � � � tb † A + b i a A + t ∗ a † a † b † H = A b b A + i + µ A a A − µ B b B A,i A B masses of fermion at K and K ′ points have different signs • Other parity preserving mass terms ∼ m ¯ ψγ 5 ψ from Kekule lattice distortion C. Chamon et. al. arXiv:0707:0293[cond-mat] • Parity violating mass term with external field – masses of K and K ′ points have same sign – “Hall effect without external field” F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1987) Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Mass term from staggered chemical potential: � � � tb † b i a A + t ∗ a † � a † � b † H = A b A + � + µ A a A − µ B b B A + � b i A,i A B Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

The resulting Hamiltonian is i e i� k · � a i t � � µ � h = i e − i� t ∗ � k · � a i − µ Two non-intersecting energy-bands separated by a gap: √ � µ 2 + t 2 (1 + 2 cos(3 k y 3 k x )) 2 + t 2 sin 2 (3 k y E ( k ) = ± 2 ) cos( 2 ) 2 µ 2 + v 2 � F k 2 Linearize near Dirac points → E = ± Dirac Hamiltonian for a massive fermion m k x − ik y   0 k x + ik y − m H Dirac =   − m k x − ik y   0 k x + ik y m Two species of massive relativistic fermions that transform into each other under P and T Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Domain Walls Consider the electronic properties of omain walls G.W.S. et. al. Phys.Rev.Lett. 101, 087204 (2008) Virtual Journal of Nanoscale Science & Technology Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Phase A Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Phase B Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Zig-zag Domain Wall Phase A → Phase B Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Armchair Domain Wall Phase A → Phase B Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Domain Wall in the continuum Hamiltonian In the continuum Hamiltonian the domain wall is described by a position- dependent mass term: m ( x ) − i∂ x + ∂ y   0 − i∂ x − ∂ y − m ( x ) H Dirac =   m ( x ) − i∂ x − ∂ y   0 − i∂ x + ∂ y − m ( x ) where m ( x ) has a soliton profile m ( x → ∞ ) = m , m ( x → −∞ ) = − m Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Consider the spinor 1 0      e − � x  e − � x i 0 0 dx ′ m ( x ′ ) , 0 dx ′ m ( x ′ ) ψ L = e − iky ψ R = e − iky         0 1   0 − i H Dirac ψ L ( x, y ) = v F k ψ L ( x, y ) , H Dirac ψ R ( x, y ) = − v F k ψ R ( x, y ) These are left-movers and right-movers bound to the domain wall. Effective field theory Massless 1+1-dimensional fermions propagating along the domain wall: � � � iψ † L ∂ y ψ L − iψ † H = ¯ hv F dy R ∂ y ψ R add interactions = Luttinger liquid or Peierls Instability? Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008

Back to the lattice: A B (a) (b) (c) Exact results in two dimensional field theory, GGI, September 2008