custer county airport
play

Custer County Airport Master Plan Facility Requirements/Alternatives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Custer County Airport Master Plan Facility Requirements/Alternatives June 27, 2019 Agenda Introductions Review Existing Conditions Review Forecast Facility Requirements Alternatives Project Status Planning the future of Custer County


  1. Custer County Airport Master Plan Facility Requirements/Alternatives June 27, 2019

  2. Agenda Introductions Review Existing Conditions Review Forecast Facility Requirements Alternatives

  3. Project Status Planning the future of Custer County Airport

  4. Existing Airfield (page 2-13)

  5. Existing – Runway Component Runway 8/26 Runway Length (feet) 5,498 Runway Width (feet) 60 Runway S urface Material Bituminous Asphalt Runways S urface Treatment None S ingle Wheel Pavement S trength <12,500 S WL Runway Design Code A/ B-1 S mall

  6. Existing – Wind/Weather (page 2-18) All Weather IFR Crosswind Component (Wind S peed) Crosswind Component (Wind S peed) Runway Runway 10.5 knots 13.0 knots 16.0 knots 20.0 knots 10.5 knots 13.0 knots 16.0 knots 20.0 knots - - - - Runway 08-26 69.06% 98.55% Runway 08-26 98.20 % 99.39 % Source: KCUT ASOS, KLJ Analysis Source: KCUT ASOS, KLJ Analysis

  7. Forecast – Based Aircraft (page 3-6) Custer Historical Based Aircraft Custer Based Aircraft Forecast 25 20 19 20 18 Based Aircraft Based Aircraft 17 15 16 15 10 14 13 5 12 2018 2023 2028 2033 0 Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Preferred Forecast FAA TAF S D S AS P Metric 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 CAGR Single-Engine 1.44% 12 13 14 15 16 Helicopter 0.00% 2 2 2 2 2 Ultralight/Other - 0 0 0 0 0 Total Based 14 15 16 17 18 1.26% Aircraft

  8. Forecast – Operations by Fleet Size (page 3-11) Fleet Mix S hare Breakdown S ource: KLJ Analysis, CAGR=Compounded Annual Growt h Rat e Metric 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 CAGR Single-Engine Piston 71.0% 71.0% 70.0% 70.0% 69.0% -0.14% Multi-Engine Piston 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 0.00% Turboprop 16.0% 16.0% 17.0% 17.0% 17.0% 0.30% Turbojet 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 0.00% Helicopter 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.53% S ource: KLJ Analysis, FAA Traffic Flow Reported Operations Data Fleet Mix S ample (2008-2018) Management S ystem (TFMS ) Aircraft ID Type ARC Operations Avg./Year Cessna 172/177/182 S ingle Engine Piston A-I 244 18 Beech C90/B200 Turboprop B-II 183 16 Cirrus SR-22 S ingle Engine Piston A-I 57 5 Cessna 210 S ingle Engine Piston A-I 55 5 Socata TBM-700 S ingle Engine Piston A-I 43 4 Pilatus PC-12 Turboprop A-II 42 4 Total 2008-2018 Recorded Operations 624 359

  9. Forecast – Critical Design Aircraft (page 3-11) ARC A-I/Small Aircraft ARC A-II/Small Aircraft Total Operation Fleet Mix Forecast Cessna 402 Pilatus PC-12 Metric 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 CAGR Single-Engine Piston 2,599 2,701 2,799 2,942 3,048 0.80% ARC B-I/Small Aircraft ARC B-II/Small Aircraft Multi-Engine Piston 220 228 240 252 265 0.94% Piper Navajo Beech King Air 90 Turboprop 586 609 680 715 751 1.25% Turbojet 220 228 240 252 265 0.94% Helicopter 37 38 40 42 88 4.50% Citation CJ1 Beech King Air 200 Total Operations 3,660 3,804 3,999 4,203 4,417 0.94% Source: KLJ Analysis Helicopter (less than 7,000 lbs) ARC B-II Air Tractor 802 Aerostar 350 (SEAT)

  10. Forecast – Summary (page 3-14) Activity Levels Average Annual Compound Growth Rates 0-10 0-15 0-20 A. Forecast Levels 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 0-5 Years Years Years Years Operations Itinerant Air Carrier - - - - - - - - - Commuter/Air Taxi - - - - - - - - - Total Commercial Operations - - - - - - - - - General Aviation 1,255 1,314 1,375 1,439 1,507 0.92% 0.92% 0.92% 0.92% Military - - - - - - - - - Total Itinerant Operations 1,255 1,314 1,375 1,439 1,507 Local Civil 2,405 2,490 2,624 2,764 2,910 0.95% 0.95% 0.95% 0.95% Military - - - - - - - - - Total Local Operations TOTAL OPERATIONS 3,660 3,804 3,999 4,203 4,417 0.94% 0.94% 0.94% 0.94% Annual Instrument Approaches - - - - - - - - - Peak Hour Operations Based Aircraft Single Engine 12 13 14 15 16 1.61% 1.55% 1.49% 1.44% Multi Engine - - - - - - - - - Turbojet - - - - - - - - - Helicopter 2 2 2 2 2 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Other - - - - - - - - - TOTAL BASED AIRCRAFT 14 15 16 17 18 1.38% 1.34% 1.30% 1.26% B. Operational Factors GA Ops per Based Aircraft 261 253 254 247 245 S ource: KLJ Analysis. Not e: S ome f igures are rounded

  11. Facility Requirements

  12. Instrument Procedures (page 4-5) Cloud Total Visibility Hours Per Weather Condition Ceiling Observation Minimum Year (avg.) Minimum Percentage VMC 1,000 feet 3 miles 92.07% 8,065 Potential Usable IMC* 400 feet 1 mile 4.22% 370 Closed (Below < 400 feet < 1 mile 3.71% 324 Minimums) Source: National Climatic Data Center data from Custer County Airport AWOS (2008-2014; hourly), KLJ Analysis *Additional capture assumes non-precision approach establish with 400-foot cloud ceiling and 1-mile flight visibility. VFR Weather - - 8,065 Reduce to 400” – 1-mile - - Improves 370 hours

  13. Runway Length and Width (page 4-9) Airport and Runway Data Airport Elevation 5619.7 feet Mean Daily Maximum Temperature of Hottest Month 81.3° F Aircraft Classification Recommended Runway Length Small Airplanes 12,500 Pounds or less 10 or more passenger seats 6,700 feet Less than 10 passenger seats at 100 percent of fleet 6,700 feet Less than 10 passenger seats at 95 percent of fleet 6,700 feet S ource: FAA AC 150/ 5325-4B, KLJ Analysis. Not e: Runway lengt h requirement s est imat ed based on chart s f or airport planning purposes only. Existing Runway Length = 5,498’ FAA recommended runway length for small general aviation aircraft = 6,700’ With cost of extension and terrain, practicable recommended extension = 6,200’ Existing Runway Width = 60’ With significant amount of variable winds - recommended widening = 75’

  14. Requirement or Recommendation Design Standard Actual Condition Existing Future/ Ultimate Runway Identification 8/ 26 8/ 26 8/ 26 Runway Classification Utility Utility Utility Aircraft Classification S mall Aircraft S mall Aircraft S mall Aircraft A/ B-I-Vis (Both) A/ B-I-Vis (Both) A/ B-I-5000 (Both) Runway Design Code (RDC) B-II-5000 B-II-5000 Approach Reference Code (APRC) B-II-5000 Departure Reference Code (DPRC) B-II B-II B-II Pavement Strength (Wheel Loading) 12,500 (DW) 12,500 (DW) 12,500 (DW) 1.28% 1.28% Effective Runway Gradient 2.0% Max. 60’ Runway Width 60’ 75’ Runway Safety Area (RSA) Width 120’ 120’ 120’ RSA Length Beyond Threshold 240’ 240’ 300’ Runway Lighting MIRL MIRL MIRL RPZ Start from Runway 200’ 200’ 200’ RPZ Length 1,000’ 1,000’ 1,000’ RPZ Inner Width 250’ 250’ 250’ RPZ Outer Width 450’ 450’ 450’ Visibility Minimums 3 mile (both) 3 mile (Both) 1 Mile (Both) Approach Type Vis (Both) Vis (Both) NPI (Both) 20:1 / 20:1 14 CFR Part 77 Approach Slope 20:1 (Both) 20:1 (Both) ROFA Width 250’ 250’ 250’ ROFA Length Beyond Threshold 240’ 240’ 240’ ROFZ Width 250’ 250’ 250’ ROFZ Length Past Runway 200’ 200’ 200’ Type 2 (Both) Type 2 (Both) Threshold Siting Surface (TSS) Type Type 4 (Both) TSS Start from Runway End 0’ / 0’ 0’ (Both) 200’ (Both) TSS Length 2,250’ (Both) 2,250’ (Both) 10,000’ (Both) TSS Inner Width 250’ (Both) 250’ ’ (Both) 400’ (Both) TSS Outer Width 700’ (Both) 700’ (Both) 3,400’ (Both) TSS Slope 20:1 (Both) 20:1 (Both) 20:1 (Both) Visual and Instrument NAVAIDs PAPI PAPI PAPI Runway and Taxiway Separation N/ A N/ A N/ A Runway and Parking Separation 300’ 125’ 125’ Runway and Hold Line Separation 125’ 125’ 125’ Centerline Distance to 25’ BRL 300 300 300’

  15. Existing Aera

  16. Hangar Area (page 4-20) Category Existing Base PAL 1 PAL 2 PAL 3 PAL 4 Based Hangars Aircraft Storage Space (SF) Existing = 28,175 SF including Storage Hangars 20,000 18,500 20,100 21,500 23,000 24,500 1,575 SF of planned hangar Capacity/(Deficiency) 1,500 (100) (1,500) (3,000) (4,500) removal, new total = 23,000 SF SASO Conventional 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Transient Hangars FBO (Based) - 1,500 1,500 1,600 1,600 1,700 Existing is an as – needed basis Maintenance - 3,500 3,700 3,900 4,100 4,400 Total Based 23,000 26,500 28,300 30,000 31,700 33,600 Capacity/(Deficiency) (3,500) (5,300) (7,000) (8,700) (10,600) FBO (Transient) 3,600 2,400 3,360 3,360 4,800 6,240 Capacity/(Deficiency) 800 240 240 (1,200) (2,640) Total Space 26,600 28,900 31,660 33,360 36,500 39,840 Capacity/(Deficiency) - (2,300) (5,060) (6,760) (9,900) (13,240) S ource: KLJ Analysis. Not e: RED indicat es a def iciency t o exist ing capacit y.

Recommend


More recommend