CSBA Roseville Joint Union High School District Presenters: Paige - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CSBA Roseville Joint Union High School District Presenters: Paige Stauss, Board Vice President Ron Severson, Superintendent

Our Board Linda M. Park Paige K. Stauss R. Jan Pinney Scott E. Huber Rene Aguilera President Vice President Member Member Member

● district profile ● changing the goal setting process (the role of the board) Overview ● focus on data ● A-G - a case study

Granite Oakmont Bay High Antelope High School High School School 2,033 1,834 1,820 Roseville Woodcreek High High School School 2,207 1,958

Adelante High School (continuation) 120 Independence High School Roseville (independent Adult School study/credit recovery) 900 140

Total Enrollment by Ethnicity

2014-15 Target Unduplicated Population Summary

2014-15 Target Unduplicated Population Summary 0% 1% 27% Non-target population Free/Reduced Eligible English Learners Foster Youth 72%

2014-15 Target Students By School Adelante, 97 Woodcreek, 481 Antelope, 994 Roseville, 683 Oakmont, 554 Granite Bay, 216 Independence, 63 Independence 63

English Learners by Language 40 Languages in “Other” 30% Other 47% Punjabi Russian/Eukrainian Spanish 6% 17%

CAHSEE 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 Math ELA Math ELA Math ELA Antelope 94 92 93 92 94 92 Granite Bay 98 97 99 98 99 99 Roseville 89 89 91 92 88 87 Oakmont 96 94 95 92 92 91 Woodcreek 96 97 98 98 96 95

2014-15 Graduation Rate

Four by Four Block ● Four 87-minute periods each day ● Intervention periods built in at three sites ● Capacity - access to 32 vs 24 courses

Old Paradigm Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Cursory Focus was Board rubber Document that Cabinet involvement of on tasks, stamped was put on a developed site leadership processes, shelf goals budget Board priorities for Superintendent

Problems Timing Alignment Response Goals developed No focus on the No buy in from in July/August – primary mission sites or staff budget and of the District – staffing in Improved January-April student achievement

● we focused on high priority student outcomes ● we focused on data – 2006 SMART goals What if... ● the board engaged in a dialogue with key leaders ● we focused accountability around our goals ● we prioritized our budget and staffing decisions to match

Purpose of Goals Meeting 1 Revisit the vision 2 Consider relevant data 3 Examine current goals 4 Revise and establish new goals

S M A R T

Roseville Joint Union High School District 2007--2008 District Goals 1. Increase % of students who are eligible to apply directly to a 4-year college or university. 2. Develop CTE master plan that increases the breadth and accessibility of CTE and ROP programs. 3. Develop district end-of-course common assessments in the five core areas. 4. Identify at-risk students by the 7th grade and create embedded interventions. 5. Improve API, SAT, AP, A-G data to move up in the similar schools’ band.

CTE Intervention Gold Medals A through G

PLC’s Made the Team Common Assessments

Agony of Defeat Grades ...so far :-)

Roseville Joint Union High School District 2009--2010 District Goals 1. Increase by 3 percentage points the number of graduates who complete A-G requirements. 2. Develop and implement two or more CTE programs of study at each site. 3. Analyze, evaluate, revise, and achieve 100% implementation of current district-wide end-of-course common assessments and develop and implement new assessments in additional core academic areas. (Eng. 11/12, Government/Economics, Spanish 3, Algebra 2/Integrates 3, and Earth Science) 4. Decrease by a minimum of 5 percentage points the number of students receiving Ds and Fs in English 9, Algebra 1, and Geometry courses. 5. Train and develop five additional PLC facilitators at each site to implement methods and strategies of professional learning communities. 6. Meet mandated proficiency rates for CAHSEE with all groups on 10th grade census tests.

A-G completion rate A. History/Social Science (2 years) B. English (4 years) C. Mathematics (3 years, UC recommends 4) D. Laboratory Science (2 years, UC recommends 3) E. Language Other than English (2 years, UC recommends 3) F. Visual/Performing Arts (1 year) G. College Preparatory Elective (1 year)

Why A-G? ● Synergistic Data Point ● Community Expectations ● Equity ● Creates Opportunity

A-G Completion Comparison 2006-2008 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total School Granite Bay HS 58.7 73.1 65.8 53.8 72.5 62.2 64.9 72.1 68.4 Oakmont HS 41.3 51.3 46.7 28.4 40.1 34.8 30.5 47.6 39.3 Roseville HS 29.3 40.1 34.8 29.7 32.1 30.9 36.4 54.2 44.4 Woodcreek HS 34.1 51.5 43.3 47.9 58.7 53.5 45.3 59.9 52.4

Strategies Accountability Changes published and celebrated Back to school nights, 8 th grade orientation, Ubiquitous registration, individual conferences, group conferences, board meetings, goals CTE, electives, recommended schedules, Structures drop processes, AVID, AP, IB Supported Budget, staffing

Interventions ● Credit recovery ● A-G recovery ● After school tutoring ● Intervention periods/counselors ● Learning support specialists ● MFT/social work interns

Interventions Collateral Damage ● Stand alone CTE or ❖ Credit Recovery other non-A-G electives ❖ A-G Recovery ● Less choice with ❖ After School Tutoring professional development ● Angst and pushback ❖ Intervention ● Lower mean scores on AP/ periods/counselors SAT/ ACT (short term) ❖ Learning Support ● More awards – longer Specialists celebrations ❖ MFT/Social work interns

Collateral Improvements ● Advanced Placement – EOS ● CST/CAHSEE ● Blended learning ● Partner schools ● GPA’s – 123 ● Unleashed creativity – Econ/AP gov pilot ● Quality of applicants ● Gratitude of families

Roseville Joint Union High School District 2012--2013 District Goals 1. Improve student proficiency on California Standards Tests by 10 percentage points in Algebra 1, Geometry and Algebra 2. 2. Increase by 3 percentage points, with every district-wide significant subgroup, the number of graduates who complete UC a-g requirements. 3. Increase by 5 percentage points the number of students who score 70% or better on the District Common Assessments. 4. Provide training for 25 teachers at each site on effective instructional practices and PLC concepts to improve student learning and increase the effectiveness of their professional learning teams. 5. Improve student performance, with every district-wide significant subgroup, on California High School Exit Exams (CaHSEE) to meet mandated Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) targets.

A-G Completion Comparison 2006-2008 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total School Granite Bay HS 58.7 73.1 65.8 53.8 72.5 62.2 64.9 72.1 68.4 Oakmont HS 41.3 51.3 46.7 28.4 40.1 34.8 30.5 47.6 39.3 Roseville HS 29.3 40.1 34.8 29.7 32.1 30.9 36.4 54.2 44.4 Woodcreek HS 34.1 51.5 43.3 47.9 58.7 53.5 45.3 59.9 52.4

UC A-G Economic Status Econ. Disadvantaged All Students 2013-14 Female Male Total Female Male Total District 65.1 51.8 58.4 76.4 67.5 72.1 Antelope 78.9 70.6 74.8 80.1 72.8 76.5 Granite Bay 63 44.8 53.6 81 74.4 77.7 Oakmont 68.3 61.1 65 77.6 70.8 74.6 Roseville 59.2 47.2 53.4 73 62.3 68.3 Woodcreek 80 47.2 53.4 86.6 73.5 79.5