creating unified waste education and planning
play

Creating Unified Waste Education and Planning ALEX THOMAS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Creating Unified Waste Education and Planning ALEX THOMAS AMERICORPS MEMBER SPOKANE COUNTY, SPOKANE CITY, GONZAGA UNIVERSITY, COMMUNITY COLLEGES OF SPOKANE, EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Spokane County Higher Education Partnership Where it


  1. Creating Unified Waste Education and Planning ALEX THOMAS AMERICORPS MEMBER SPOKANE COUNTY, SPOKANE CITY, GONZAGA UNIVERSITY, COMMUNITY COLLEGES OF SPOKANE, EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY

  2. Spokane County Higher Education Partnership  Where it came from  Who it’s made up of  What it’s accomplished  Where it’s headed  How you can recreate it

  3. Fall of 2017  Hosting a Solid Waste Higher Education Workshop

  4. Where to Start  Knowing the county  Not from WA, but familiar  Research on best practices  Assessment of where everyone was with waste diversion and planning

  5. Results from Best Practices

  6. Results from Best Practices

  7. Results from Best Practices

  8. Determining the Starting Point  The biggest thing to solving a problem is quantifying it first  Data from bills  Pairing Audits  Waste Audits  Stakeholders for each campus  Moving beyond the immediate stakeholders of the project

  9. What’d I Find

  10. What’d I Find Pairings  Eastern: 80%  Gonzaga: 75%  Community Colleges: 20%

  11. What’d I Find  Major Stakeholders were almost always interested  No one had done a comprehensive look at this fully  Though Eastern had done the most  Pairings and capture rates needed to fixed  A comprehensive strategy and plan was needed  Data gathering was going to be harder than initially thought  Trust building

  12. What’d we do

  13. RecycleMania

  14. RecycleMania – Diversion Rates Eastern Gonzaga CCS 31% 39% 34% 29%

  15. Zero Waste Game Day

  16. Education  Presentations (Emails)  Posters  Shadow Boxes

  17. Audits

  18. Audits

  19. Audits

  20. Audits

  21. Investment and Infrastructure  Investment/Infrastructure  CCS investment  Inside, Out, Offices ($4,000)

  22. Investment and Infrastructure  Investment/Infrastructure  CCS investment  Inside, Out, Offices ($4,000)

  23. Investment and Infrastructure

  24. Investment and Infrastructure  Investment/Infrastructure  CCS investment  Inside, Out, Offices ($4,000)  CCS Consolidation  Eastern Pairings  GU Pairings and Consolidation

  25. Data  Gonzaga – 19 Accounts  Eastern – Readily Available  CCS – Lead to other developments (Water)

  26. Compost  CCS – exploring (Head starts)  EWU - meetings

  27. Remote Campuses  CCS  Far north as Republic, Far south as WSU  Repurposing dual stream bins

  28. Partnerships  Custodial (CCS – mapping efforts, feedback conduit)  Dining (Eastern meetings, GU Audits and Training [LeanPath])  Housing (GU totally invested but no one is looking at it. EWU same but no one has the time. Working on it)

  29. Student Partners  CCS – ASG  EWU – Classes/Faculty  GU - GEO

  30. Where to Go Next  Not everything is done  Composting at CCS  Consolidation at GU  New signage and better pairing at EWU  Reduction!

  31. Waste Management Plans  First time for Each  Documenting what we’ve done

  32. Time for Q and A  Andrew Lemberg – Resource Conservation Manager Community Colleges of Spokane  Erik Budsberg – Sustainability Coordinator Eastern Washington University  Lindsay Chapman – Spokane County  Kris Major – Spokane City

  33. Thank You

  34. Discussion

Recommend


More recommend