making waste productive creating energy from waste
play

Making Waste Productive Creating Energy from Waste Creating Energy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Making Waste Productive Creating Energy from Waste Creating Energy Inputs from Current Waste Outputs ? Organic material ( waste ) can be converted into energy ( methane) through a process called anaerobic digestion ? Applications where waste


  1. Making Waste Productive

  2. Creating Energy from Waste

  3. Creating Energy Inputs from Current Waste Outputs ? Organic material ( waste ) can be converted into energy ( methane) through a process called anaerobic digestion ? Applications where waste disposal costs $100,000s/year can be turned into energy worth $100,000s/year

  4. Creating Energy Inputs from Current Waste Outputs ? Two industries suitable to making energy from waste outputs ? Food industry Cheese plants Snack Food plants Prepared Food plants ? Biofuels industry Ethanol plants Biodiesel plants

  5. Converting Biomass to Energy ? The energy value of a waste stream is measured in pounds of chemical oxygen demand (COD) ? Every pound of COD digested results in 5.6 cubic feet of methane ? An effective anaerobic digester usually converts 95+% of the available COD into methane ? Every cubic foot of methane produces around 1,000 BTU’s of energy ? Approximately 5,600 BTUs in a pound of COD ? A pound of organic solids will contain around a pound of COD ? A truck load of solids can contain around 50,000 pounds of COD ? Energy potential to power a 1 MW generator on a continuous basis

  6. Segregating Biomass Streams ? Process and environmental technologies segregate the insoluble fraction of a biomass stream from the soluble ? Isolate the energy potential material within a facility Clarifiers Screens All types of filtration and dissolved air flotation devices ? The isolated insoluble high energy potential stream usually ends up on a truck…

  7. Types of Biomass Streams to Consider ? Hauled material ? Unsalable product ? Isolated streams ? Wastewater In most applications a significant portion of the energy is contained in a small portion of the waste

  8. Three Most Common Disposal Methods ? Land application ? Landfill ? Animal feed

  9. Paying others to haul and dispose of biomass . . . Is the waste of a valuable asset Stop feeding your cash to cows!

  10. How the Anaerobic Process Works to Create Energy

  11. Creating Energy Using the Anaerobic Process Conversion of organic material Raw input material: Fats, Oils, proteins, starches, carbohydrates, sugars Methane: 5.6 ft3/ lb COD Carbon Dioxide Discharge: Acetogenic bacteria Methanogenic bacteria Acetic Acid >95% COD Removal break complex food break acetic acid down molecules down to to produce Methane � 99% BOD Removal produce Carbon dioxide and Acetic Acid pH Adjustment Temperature Biomass accumulation: Control ~1% of Aerobic rate Digester • Air is not used so process proceeds at a much lower energy input than Aerobic treatment

  12. Factors in Renewable Energy Plant Design ? Material handling ? Solids retention ? Good contact ? pH control ? Temperature control ? Nutrients ? Gas utilization

  13. The Economics of Making Waste Productive

  14. Factors that Weigh in an Economic Decision ? Avoided disposal cost ? Energy value ? Green value— Some options have significant federal/state taxes and other credits ? Renewable energy credits ? Emissions trading credits

  15. Identifying and Evaluating Energy Potential

  16. Identifying Energy Potential ? There is a potential project if… ? Gas costs greater than $7 per MM BTU ? Electricity costs greater than 7.5¢ per KWh ? The plant produces 20,000 lbs. or more COD per day ? The plant is situated where there is a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) in place ? Significant avoided cost

  17. Identifying Energy Potential ? By individual plant: 3-step process ? STEP ONE: Data evaluation, using existing plant data Estimate the effectiveness technology to generate energy in the form of methane gas ? STEP TWO: Lab evaluation, using actual samples of plant residuals and organic waste Determine parameters, limits and potential quantities of methane gas generation ? STEP THREE: Demonstration project Test the design parameters on waste residuals to finalize the optimum factors for a full-scale plant

  18. Evaluating Energy Potential ? Demonstration project (pilot) can be an important step to developing design ? Material handling, gas storage, waste blending

  19. Identifying Energy Potential ? By geographic area, in cooperation with regional facility (power plant, research facility, cooperative) ? Minnesota Power study ? Wayne County, OH study ? By individual plant ? Cheese Plant demonstration ? Snack Food Plant demonstration ? Biofuels Plant demonstration

  20. Identifying Energy Potential ? By geography: (1) Study with MN Power ? Food manufacturers in Minnesota Power territory ? Study done in 2005 in two phases: telephone survey and onsite visits to four facilities Confirmed plant waste quantities Sampled each waste stream (packed on ice)

  21. Identifying Energy Potential ? By geography: (1) Study with MN Power ? Results Lbs/COD/day BTU Value KW TOTALEnergy Equivalent Value Snack Food 26,000 lb/day 140 MM BTU/day 550 kW/hr 2.3 MM BTU/hr Manufacturer Liquid Egg 4,800 lb/day 26 MM BTU/day 100 kW/hr 0.4 MM BTU/hr Manufacturer Dry Egg 1,500 lb/day 8.3 MM BTU/day 32 kW/hr 0.13 MM BTU/hr Manufacturer Beef and Port 620 lb/day 3.5 MM BTU/day 13 kW/hr 0.06 MM BTU/hr Repacking Plant ? Feasible dedicated plants (with reasonable timeliness for ROI ? A regional cogeneration plant would treat all of these manufacturers ? The potential waste streams from the other facilities do not generate enough energy to make dedicated plants or a cogeneration facility economically feasible

  22. Identifying Energy Potential ? By geography: (2) Study in Ohio ? Food manufacturers in Wayne County, OH ? Study done in 2006 with onsite visits to six facilities Confirmed plant waste quantifies Sampled each waste stream (packed on ice)

  23. Identifying Energy Potential ? By geography: (2) Study in Ohio ? Results Lbs/COD/day BTU Value kW Recoverable Heat Byproducts Plant Data not available Poultry Byproducts 6,250 lbs/day 35 MM BTU/day 135 kW/hr 0.6 MM BTU/hr (dead stock rendering) Plant Egg Processor 4,000 lbs/day 22.4 MM BTU/day 86 kW/hr 0.35 MM BTU/hr Dairy 5,250 lbs/day 29 MM BTU/day 110 kW/hr 0.48 MM BTU/hr Dairy 13,500 lbs/day 76 MM BTU/day 290 kW/hr 1.2 MM BTU/hr Cheese Processor 56,300 lb/day 315 MM BTU/day 1,200 kW/hr 5.1 MM BTU/hr ? Completed demonstration project on cheese manufacturing plant ? Cheese manufacturer can sustain full plant Can increase energy by processing waste from other regional plants

  24. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Project timeline: 9-29-05 to 5-25-06 ? Waste source ? Permeate stream COD concentration averaged 52,000 mg/l ? Existing disposal methods ? Recovery of whey protein concentrate ? Recovery of lactose ? Treatment of 350,000 gallons per day of waste in plant-owned treatment plant Trucked 6,000 gallon of waste from WPC and lactose recovery process

  25. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Demonstration project goals ? Replicate a full-scale loading rate 50 lbs of feed COD/1000 gallons of digester liquid volume ? Determine COD Removal Efficiency ? Evaluate Gas Quality ? Evaluate Material handling needs ? Determine optimum factors for a full-scale plant

  26. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history ? Permeate (whey filtered to remove protein) fed to digester (1-18-06? 5-25-06) Average COD strength of 53,000 mg/l Ramped up until the target feed rate of 300 lbs COD/day (50 lbs/1000 gallons of digester volume)

  27. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history: COD ? Operating at design capacity on permeate

  28. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history: methane production ? Relatively steady Flow dropped when the gas flow was shut down to clean the gas discharge line of accumulated moisture

  29. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history: methane flow per unit of COD removed ? Consistently within the projected flow rate of 5.6 cubic feet of methane/lb of COD

  30. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history: BOD ? Virtually the entire BOD available has been consumed in the digester

  31. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history: alkalinity ? Stable; most of the alkalinity is retained in the digester, conserving chemical

  32. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history: calcium (needed for growth) ? Sufficient quantities; supplemental calcium is not required

  33. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history: hydrogen sulfide ? A contaminant in the gas could cause operational difficulties in high concentrations; data inconclusive

  34. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history: solids—TS, VS, TSS, VSS ? TSS- No accumulation of total suspended solids

  35. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history: Methane and CO 2 Production ? Bag samples were collected to verify the accuracy of the on-line instruments that measure COD and methane (two manufacturers = 4 instruments)

  36. Demonstration Project #1: Cheese Plant ? Test history ? summary ? Conversion of the dairy permeate to energy is straight forward and achievable Digester operated in a stable fashion No accumulation of COD in the digester Converted 98 percent of the COD (>99% of the BOD) to energy Gas production met the design value of 5.6 cubic feet of methane/lb of COD removed ? Energy breakdown ? 80% to 100% of gas demand ? 1 MW power output plus heat recovery ? Status ? Demonstration project completed ? Final plant design

Recommend


More recommend