combining and particle spectroscopy the decay behaviour
play

Combining and particle spectroscopy The decay behaviour of the PDR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Combining and particle spectroscopy The decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo S.G. P ICKSTONE *, V. D ERYA , A. H ENNIG , M. S PIEKER *, M.W EINERT , J. W ILHELMY *, AND A. Z ILGES I NSTITUTE FOR N UCLEAR P HYSICS U NIVERSITY OF C OLOGNE


  1. Combining γ and particle spectroscopy The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo S.G. P ICKSTONE *, V. D ERYA , A. H ENNIG , M. S PIEKER *, M.W EINERT , J. W ILHELMY *, AND A. Z ILGES I NSTITUTE FOR N UCLEAR P HYSICS U NIVERSITY OF C OLOGNE supported by DFG ZI 510/7-1 and BMBF 06KY9136 * Bonn-Cologne Graduate School of Physics and Astronomy September 15 th , 2015 COMEX5 Kraków S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  2. Pygmy Dipole Resonance – decay properties  Usually Γ 0 /Γ =1 assumed for B(E1) values from ( γ , γ ') – Possible explanation of B(E1)-value discrepancy  Branching ratios probe wave functions  Selective excitation needed to determine weak branchings − 1 PDR Bremsstrahlung Inelastic scattering + 2 1 + 0 gs D. Savran, T. Aumann, and A. Zilges, PPNP 70 (2013) 210 S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  3. Pygmy Dipole Resonance – decay properties  Usually Γ 0 /Γ =1 assumed for B(E1) values from ( γ , γ ') – Possible explanation of B(E1)-value discrepancy  Branching ratios probe wave functions  Selective excitation needed to determine weak branchings − 1 PDR Monoenergetic photons 𝐹 𝑌 = 𝐹 𝛿 Particle- γ -coincidences 𝐹 𝑌 ≈ 𝐹 𝑞 − 𝐹 𝑞′ + 2 1 + 0 gs D. Savran, T. Aumann, and A. Zilges, PPNP 70 (2013) 210 S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  4. Setup for p- γ coincidence experiments SONIC HORUS 8 Δ E-E or single PIPS Detectors 14 HPGe θ = 60°, 90°, 120°, 130° θ = 35°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 145° Angles Efficiency 4% solid angle coverage ~ 2% @ 1.3 MeV Resolution typically 70 keV in-beam ~ 2 keV @ 1.3 MeV SONIC HORUS HORUS S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  5. p- γ coincidence matrix of 92 Mo 92 Mo(p,p' γ ) @ E p =10.5 MeV E γ [keV] E X [keV]  Diagonal gates can be set to select decays to specific levels – Ground state decays S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  6. p- γ coincidence matrix of 92 Mo 92 Mo(p,p' γ ) @ E p =10.5 MeV E γ [keV] E X [keV]  Diagonal gates can be set to select decays to specific levels – Ground state decays S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  7. Ground state decays – comparison to ( γ,γ ')  Upper panel: 92 Mo(p,p' γ ) experimental results @10.5 MeV from (p,p' γ ) preliminary – Counts corrected by preliminary efficiency – Isotropic distribution assumed  Lower panel: experimental results from ( γ,γ ') – ∝ B(E1) without 92 Mo( γ , γ ') branching G. Rusev, PhD Thesis, TU Dresden (2006) S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  8. Ground state decays – comparison to ( γ,γ ')  Upper panel: 92 Mo(p,p' γ ) experimental results @10.5 MeV from (p,p' γ ) preliminary – Counts corrected by preliminary efficiency – Isotropic distribution assumed  Lower panel: experimental results from ( γ,γ ') – ∝ B(E1) without 92 Mo( γ , γ ') branching G. Rusev, PhD Thesis, TU Dresden (2006) S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  9. p- γ coincidence matrix of 92 Mo 92 Mo(p,p' γ ) @ E p =10.5 MeV E γ [keV] E X [keV]  Diagonal gates can be set to select decays to specific levels – Ground state decays – Decays to 2 1 + , to 4 1 + , … S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  10. p- γ coincidence matrix of 92 Mo 92 Mo(p,p' γ ) @ E p =10.5 MeV E γ [keV] E X [keV]  Diagonal gates can be set to select decays to specific levels – Ground state decays – Decays to 2 1 + , to 4 1 + , … S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  11. Decay branching ratio vs. energy Γ 1 ≈ 92 Mo Branching to 2 1 + Γ 0 + Γ 1 • observed • not observed  No trend with energy S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  12. Branching ratio: experiment vs. theory experiment 92 Mo  Experiment and theory show similar picture theory QPM calculations by N. Tsoneva  Smaller error bars needed for higher significance S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  13. Branching ratio: experiment vs. theory experiment 92 Mo  No trend of branching ratio with strength observed  Different theoretical theory QPM calculations by N. Tsoneva prediction  Discrepancy for strong transitions S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  14. 94 Mo( p,p'γ ) @ E p = 13.5 MeV transitions to 2 1 +  Goals of experiment: – Study decay behaviour in 94 Mo( α , α ' γ ) non-magic nucleus transitions to g.s. – Individual and mean V. Derya et al. , NPA 906 (2013) 94 branching already observed in (α,α'γ) and (γ,γ ') – With our setup: • More states (if similar to 92 Mo) • Individual branching – Higher beam energy to excite states at higher energies Adopted from C. Romig et al. , PRC 88 (2013) 044331 S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  15. Excitation pattern vs. ( γ,γ') and (α,α'γ) 2 + ⨯3 - C. Romig et al. , V. Derya et al. , PRC 88 (2013) 044331 NPA 906 (2013) 94  Observed less states than in ( γ , γ '), but more states than in ( α , α ' γ ) S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  16. Decay branching ratios for 94 Mo 94 Mo  Only statistical errors are shown  No clear trend, again state to state difference preliminary 94 Mo  Needs to be compared to theoretical predictions S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  17. Validation of setup and method 94 Mo preliminary V. Derya et al. , NPA 906 (2013) 94 C. Romig et al. , PRC 88 (2013) 044331  Very good agreement with b 1 values and upper limits from 94 Mo(α,α'γ) performed at KVI with E α =136MeV S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  18. Improvement of setup – solid angle coverage ʘ ʘ ʘ Beam E Old Current New  2.2% for E 3.9% for E 8.9% for E    1.6% for Δ E-E Up to 2.8% for Δ E-E 7.8% for Δ E-E   S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

  19. Summary & Outlook  Many decays of PDR states to several final 92 Mo states observed in 92 Mo and 94 Mo + , 0 2 + , 2 2 + – 2 1  Preliminary branching ratios for PDR states could be determined for both nuclei 94 Mo – Thorough analysis ongoing  Setup and method was validated by com- parison to 94 Mo( α , α ' γ ) experiment at KVI – Comparison to mean branching ratios  Theoretical calculations needed for both cases! 119 Sn(d,p γ ) 120 Sn @E d =8.5MeV  Future experiments for PDR – Inelastic scattering – Transfer reactions with p, d, α beams ≤ 30 MeV S.G. Pickstone, AG Zilges, University of Cologne The γ decay behaviour of the PDR in 92,94 Mo

Recommend


More recommend