C haract ng S oil l C ompacti and D istur cterizing tion on a urbance i e in the F ores est E cos tem M anagem nt D emon tion P roje osyste ement onstr trati ject ct (FEMDP) P) M t. M an sfield R es earch A rea ansf esea ea By J. Bradle By J. Bradley Materi Materick – Fiel Field Natural Naturalist st Program Program, Unive Universi sity ty of of Vermo Vermont
Chittenden County, VT Mt Mansfield Study Area
Struct uctural Co Comp mplexity Enhancem emen ent
Single Tree ee Selec ecti tion
Group Selec ecti tion
Mean Width by Treatment Unit 520 510 500 490 Mean Width (cm) 480 470 460 450 440 430 420 410 400 2 3 4 5 6 7 Treatment Unit
% Area Main Trails by Unit % Area Spur Trails by Unit % Area Total Trails by Unit 100 100 100 90 90 90 Area Total Trails (M+S) (%) 80 80 80 Area Main Trails (M) (%) Area Spur Trails (S) (%) 70 70 70 60 60 60 50 50 50 40 40 40 30 30 30 20 20 20 10 10 10 0 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 Treatment Unit Treatment Unit Treatment Unit % Area Disturbed by Unit % Area Total Disturbed by Unit % Area Undisturbed by Unit 100 100 100 90 90 Area Total Disturbed (M+S+D) (%) 90 80 80 Area Undisturbed (U) (%) 80 Area Disturbed (D) (%) 70 70 70 60 60 60 50 50 50 40 40 40 30 30 30 20 20 20 10 10 0 0 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 Treatment Unit Treatment Unit Treatment Unit
% Area Main Trails by Treatment % Area Spur Trails by Treatment % Area Total Trails by Treatment 100 100 100 90 90 90 Area Total Trails (M+S) (%) 80 80 80 Area Main Trails (M) (%) Area Spur Trails (S) (%) 70 70 70 60 60 60 50 50 50 40 40 40 30 30 30 20 20 20 10 10 10 0 0 0 SCE STS GS SCE STS GS SCE STS GS Treatment Type Treatment Type Treatment Type % Area Disturbed by Treatment % Area Total Disturbed by Treatment % Area Undisturbed by Treatment 100 100 100 90 90 90 Area Total Disturbed (M+S+D) (%) 80 80 80 Area Undisturbed (U) (%) Area Disturbed (D) (%) 70 70 70 60 60 60 50 50 50 40 40 40 30 30 30 20 20 20 10 10 10 0 0 0 SCE STS GS SCE STS GS SCE STS GS Treatment Type Treatment Type Treatment Type
From: Rab, M.A.. 1999. Measures and operating standards for assessing Montreal process soil sustainability indicators with reference to Victorian Central Highlands forest, southeastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management. 117: 53-73. S0 S1 S2 S3 Soil Horizons Leaf Litter (O) Topsoil (A) Subsoil (E,B,C) Undisturbed Disturbed Disturbed Disturbed S0 S1 S2 S3 0 Points 1 Point 2 Points 3 Points
S0 S0 S0 10 Wedges S0 x 0 pts 0 Wedges S1 x 1 pt S0 S0 0 Wedges S2 x 2 pts + 0 Wedges S3 x 3 pts ___________________ S0 S0 Disturbance Score S0 S0 0 S0
S3 S3 S3 0 Wedges S0 x 0 pts 0 Wedges S1 x 1 pt S3 S3 0 Wedges S2 x 2 pts + 10 Wedges S3 x 3 pts ___________________ S3 S3 Disturbance Score S3 S3 30 S3
S0 4 Wedges S0 x 0 pts S0 S1 2 Wedges S1 x 1 pt 4 Wedges S2 x 2 pts S2 S0 + 0 Wedges S3 x 3 pts ___________________ S0 S2 Disturbance Score 10 S1 S2 S2
Disturbance Score by Treatment Disturbance Score by Treatment Main Trails Spur Trails 30 30 Disturbance Score - Main Tra ils (M) Disturbance Score - Spur Tra ils (S ) 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 SC E STS GS SC E STS GS Tr eatm ent Type Tr eatm ent Type Disturbance Score by Treatment Disturbance Score by Treatment Disturbed U ndisturbed 30 30 Disturbance Score - Undistur bed (U) Disturbance Score - Dist urbe d (D) 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 SC E STS GS SC E STS GS Tr eatm ent Type Tr eatm ent Type
Th Than ank Y You! Verm Vermont Monito t Monitoring Cooper Cooperati tive Dr. Dr. Bill Bill Keeto Keeton, Dr. Dr. Don Don Ross, Dr. Ross, Dr. Jeffre Jeffrey Hughe Hughes Fie Field Natural d Naturalist Program st Program: Walter Walter Polem Poleman, Deane Wang, Deane Wang, T-team team and and U-team team
Recommend
More recommend