Th The F e Fiel eld d Tac actics cs-For Force ce Op Optio ions ns Uni nit CITY Y & C & COUNT NTY OF SAN FRA RANCISC SCO Police Department March 12, 2019
Safety with Respect 2 Officer-In-Charge FTFO Lieutenant Michael Nevin michael.nevin@sfgov.org sfpd.ftfo@sfgov.org
Safety with Respect 3 FTFO: Composition The unit is initially authorized: Officer-in Charge (Lt. Nevin) Force Options Sergeant (Sgt. John Crudo) Field Tactics Sergeant (Sgt. Justin Bugarin) 960 (Sgt. Martin Lalor (ret.)-Tactical Sergeant) Officer Joel Aylworth Officer - TBD
Safety with Respect 4 FTFO: Completing the Lesson Loop Unit created in December 2018 to provide training oversight, consistency and guidance related to the application of field tactics and force options. Duties include: Review use of force-related instruction and incidents • Provide training-related feedback and recommendations • Assess and coordinate force options tools • Assist in the development of related policy and procedure •
Safety with Respect 5 FTFO: Current Status Current Projects FTFO Efforts Presently Include CMCR Course FTFO Monthly Meeting FTFO Review Process CPT FOS Office and Staffing Recruit FOS FDRB/ICD Review, Training & Coordination LMR Bungalow Alternate Force Options Evals
Safety with Respect 6 Thank you. Any questions?
Th The F e Fiel eld d Tac actics cs-For Force ce Op Optio ions ns Uni nit CITY Y & C & COUNT NTY OF SAN FRA RANCISC SCO Police Department March 12, 2019
Safety with Respect 2 Field Tactics-Force Options Unit Training Division Sgt. Justin-Paul Bugarin #1728 Justin-Paul.D.Bugarin@sfgov.org sfpd.ftfo@sfgov.org
Safety with Respect 3 Critical Mindset Coordinated Response Training Objectives: Critical Decision Making Teamwork Leadership at scene “The Debrief” Scenario based training
Safety with Respect 4 Priority Task Flow during High Risk Incidents A Tactics refresher course on what tasks should be completed and in what order. After identifying the varying degrees of importance using Critical Decision Making skills, the environment for a peaceful resolution is in place. Some Factors include: Duty to Protect Life • To prevent escape • Gathering of Available Resources • “Timeline” Principles •
Safety with Respect 5 CMCR: Current Status Versions of CMCR has been taught to: Tactical Unit Specialist Team Advanced Officer School (approximately 170 students) Newly promoted Captains, Lieutenants, & Sergeants
Safety with Respect 6 Thank you. Any questions?
Use o Us e of For f Force ce Executive Sponsor Working Group CITY Y & C & COUNT NTY OF SAN FRA RANCISC SCO Police Department March 12, 2019
Safety with Respect 2 CRI Status Changes Proje oject Man anagement t Matrix ix - Statu tus as of f 2. 2.14 14.19 In In Approval External External Substantial Pending Progress Process Review Validation RFI Compliance Total Uploaded Upload Use of Force 28 5 7 3 10 5 58 25 33 Bias 20 18 6 8 2 54 16 38 Community Policing 34 20 3 3 60 6 54 Accountability 37 25 6 68 6 62 Recruitment 32 14 8 2 8 10 22 Total 133 76 18 3 35 7 272 63 209 23% 77% For orm 10 1001 01 Posting Status Amount Rec # Notes Posted Form 1001 95 On Hold 1 23.2 Recvd & hold on posting. Review & report to PC the outcome of reviewing all prior OIS and discharge incidents where firearms were discharged at a moving vehicle. Total 96
Safety with Respect 3 SFPD Collaborative Reform Initiative Status of UoF Recommendations as of 2/14/2019 SFPD COLLABORATIVE REFORM INITIATIVE Status Definitions: UOF RECOMMENDATIONS In Progress: SFPD is actively working on the recommendation STATUS AS OF 2.14.19 In Approval Process: Recommendation packets with PSSPU or the COP External In Approval for approval Review, 7 External Process, 5 Validation, 3 External Review : Recommendation packets uploaded to Hillard Heintze for review External Validation: Recommendation packets uploaded to CAL DOJ for RFI, 10 review RFI: Uploaded recommendation packets returned to SFPD for more information In Progress, Substantial 28 Substantial Compliance: Implemented recommendations determined to Compliance, 5 have met compliance measures
Safety with Respect 4 Uploaded vs. Pending UoF Recommendations by Objective 2/14/2019 80 60 25 40 20 33 0 Use of Force Uploaded Recommendations 25 Recommendations Pending Upload 33 Total 58 % Uploaded Recommendations 43% % Pending Recommendations for Upload 57%
Safety with Respect 5 Recommendation Status Substa tanti tial IN PROG OGRESS SS IN PROG OGRESS SS IN APPROV OVAL PROC OCESS SS Extern rnal Rev eview ew EXT. . VALID IDATIO ION RFI Compl mpliance U of F - 28 U of F - 28 U of F - 5 U of F - 7 U of F - 3 U of F - 10 U of F -5 1.1 16.1 3.2 4.4 3.1 4.3 7.1 2.1 16.2 4.7 5.1 4.5 6.2 7.2 4.1 18.2 5.2 8.1 8.2 6.3 7.3 4.2 18.3 12.2 12.1 9.2 9.1 4.6 19.1 12.3 14.1 9.3 9.4 6.1 19.2 14.3 13.1 8.3 20.1 18.1 14.2 10.1 20.2 15.2 10.2 20.3 17.1 11.1 20.4 19.3 11.2 21.1 11.3 22.1 11.4 23.1 15.1 23.2
Safety with Respect 6 In Progress Issues Academic 1.1 The majority of deadly use of force incidents by SFPD involved persons of color. Partner with a research institution to evaluate the circumstances that give rise to deadly force, particularly those involving persons of color. Use of Force resulting in death- evaluation / Research partner (John Jay) 20.4 The SFPD should identify a research partner to further refine its use of force data collection and to explore the data findings of this report to identify appropriate data for measurement and to determine causal factors. Use of Force data collection and analysis / extraction of relevant information / Research partner (Cambridge Univ.) IT and/or Academic 21.1 The SFPD should continue to collect and analyze use of force data to identify patterns and trends over time consistent with recommendations in finding 20. Use of Force data collection and retention / comparison – Infrastructure 22.1 The SFPD needs to improve data collection on use of force so that further analysis can be conducted to better understand this finding. Use of Force data collection infrastructure / protocols
Safety with Respect 7 DGO SFPD should update the Department General Order 3.10 — Firearm Discharge Review Board to require written evaluation of 11.1 policy, training, and tactical considerations of discharge incidents, specifically identifying whether the incident was influenced by a failure of policy, training, or tactics and should include recommendations for addressing any issues identified. FDRB - Standardize a template summary include of training tactics 11.3 The SFPD should update the DGO to ensure that the FDRB is staffed with the training and education division representative as an advisory member to ensure an appropriate focus on development of responsive training protocols. FDRB - Standardize a template summary include of training tactics 11.4 Officer-involved shooting events need to be reviewed in a more timely fashion as it relates to policy, training, and procedures. The FDRB should review incidents at the conclusion of the lAD investigation rather than waiting for the District Attorney's letter of declination for charging of an officer-involved shooting incident, which can take up to two years. FDRB - Review – prior to D.A. declination 19.1 The SFPD needs to develop a standard officer-involved shooting protocol within 90 days of the release of this report. OIS - Policy protocol DGO 5.02 – Use of Firearms. The SFPD should immediately implement this provision of the draft policy. 23.1 Policy Implemented 23.2 The FDRB should be tasked with review of all prior officer-involved shooting and discharge incidents in which firearms are discharged at a moving vehicle. Policy and Protocol
Recommend
More recommend
