block 2 preliminary procedure design input meeting for
play

Block 2 : Preliminary Procedure Design Input Meeting for Logan - PDF document

Block 2 : Preliminary Procedure Design Input Meeting for Logan Airport Community Noise Reduction R. John Hansman rjhans@mit.edu Technical support from MIT ICAT students, HMMH, and Massport Noise Complaints at BOS: MIT ICAT One Dot per


  1. Block 2 : Preliminary Procedure Design Input Meeting for Logan Airport Community Noise Reduction R. John Hansman rjhans@mit.edu Technical support from MIT ICAT students, HMMH, and Massport

  2. Noise Complaints at BOS: MIT ICAT One Dot per Address Each dot represents an address that registered at least one complaint during period Departures Arrivals Complaint Data: August 2015– July 2016 Track Data: ASDE-X from 12 days of operation, 2015-2016 2

  3. MIT Technical Approach ICAT • Collect Data and Evaluate Baseline Conditions – Pre and Post RNAV – Community Input (Meetings and MCAC) • Identify Candidate Procedure Modifications • Block 1 – Clear noise benefit, no equity issues, limited operational/technical barriers • Block 2 – More complex due to potential operational/technical barriers or equity issues • Model Noise Impact – Standard and Supplemental Metrics • Evaluate Implementation Barriers – Aircraft Performance – Navigation and Flight Management (FMS) – Flight Crew Workload – Safety – Procedure Design – Air Traffic Control Workload • Recommend Procedural Modifications to Massport and FAA • Repeat for Block 2 3

  4. MIT Block 1 Final Recommendations ICAT Proc. ID Procedure Primary Benefits D = Dep. A = Arr. 1-D1 Restrict target climb speed for Reduced airframe and total noise jet departures from Runways during climb below 10,000 ft (beyond 33L and 27 to 220 knots or immediate airport vicinity) minimum safe airspeed in clean configuration, whichever is higher. 1-D2 Modify RNAV SID from Runway Departure flight paths moved north 15R to move tracks further to away from Hull the north away from populated areas. 1-D3 Modify RNAV SID from Runway Departure flight paths moved north 22L and 22R to initiate turns away from Hull and South Boston sooner after takeoff and move tracks further to the north away from populated areas. 1-D3a Option A : Climb to intercept course (VI-CF) procedure 1-D3b Option B : Climb to altitude, then direct (VA-DF) procedure 1-D3c Option C : Heading-based procedure 1-A1 Implement an overwater RNAV Arrival flight paths moved overwater approach procedure with RNP instead of over the Hull peninsula and overlay to Runway 33L that points further south follows the ground track of the jetBlue RNAV Visual procedure as closely as possible. 1-A1a Option A : Published instrument approach procedure 1-A1b Option B : Public distribution of RNAV Visual procedure 4

  5. MIT Block 2 Procedures Under Consideration ICAT Block 2 Arrival Mods Block 2 Departure Mods Low-noise overwater approach Dispersion • • procedures – Runway 33L and 27 – Open SID or direct-to flexibility for – Runway 4L and/or 4R ATC on RNAV procedures • RNAV approach with RNP Overlay Additional suggestions? • RNP approach • – Runway 22L • RNAV approach with RNP Overlay Steep approaches • – All runways Dispersion • – Runway 4L/4R • Set of procedures rotated by time, day, or other method • Dispersion generated through random process Additional suggestions? • Preliminary/Subject to Change 5

  6. Runway 22L & 4R Arrivals Low-Noise Overwater Approach Procedures 6

  7. MIT Runway 22L Arrivals: 2010-2015 ICAT 2010 2015 7

  8. Vertical Guidance vs. Non-Vertical Guidance MIT ICAT Procedures Procedure Type Minimum Final Level Maximum Final Segment Length Approach Intercept Angle RNAV (Vertical Distance where 15° at Final Guidance) Glidepath Angle Approach Fix 2.15nm Final LPV intercepts LNAV/VNAV Intermediate Segment minimum altitude RNAV (Non-Vertical Distance where 30° at Final Nonprecision (30°) Guidance) Visual Descent Angle Approach Fix Precision (15°) LP intercepts LNAV Intermediate Segment minimum altitude RNP Final Rollout at Radius to Fix farthest of: Turn from Final • 500’ altitude Approach Fix to 15 or 50 seconds Rollout Point • before Decision Altitude (depending on RNP level) 8

  9. 22L Low-Noise Offset RNAV Approach with RNP MIT ICAT Overlay Overlaying arrival corridor on existing 4R RNAV SID for 22L arrivals Notes: • Intended to comply with design criteria for vertical-guidance RNAV • Overflies midpoint of Nahant causeway at same location as 4R Secondary Turn in Intermediate Segment SID departure crossings Vertical Guidance Intercept (15°) ILS 22L CELTK5 RNAV SID 4R Proposed RNAV 22L 9

  10. 22L Low-Noise Offset RNAV Approach with RNP MIT ICAT Overlay: Noise Exposure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Aircraft B737-800 Straight In 82,162 36,698 7,609 Metric L A,MAX Modified 27,547 14,816 7,362 Procedure Noise Model AEDT Reduction 54,615 21,882 247 Notes Standard AEDT arrival profile 10

  11. 4R Low-Noise Overwater RNAV Approach with RNP MIT ICAT Overlay Advantage of overwater approach • Known issue of concern regarding initial approach path • 11

  12. 4R Low-Noise Overwater RNAV Approach with RNP MIT ICAT Overlay: Noise Exposure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Aircraft B737-800 Straight In 30,239 7,468 530 Metric L A,MAX Modified 18,283 5,792 529 Procedure Noise Model AEDT Reduction 11,956 1,676 1 Notes Standard AEDT arrival profile 12

  13. MIT Canarsie RNAV (RNP) Special ICAT 13 Figure: Honeywell

  14. MIT ICAT Notional Low-Noise Overwater RNP: BOS Rwy 4R 0.95 nmi final 2.1 nmi radius RF Matched to Canarsie RNP 13L Special Advantage of overwater approach • Known issue of concern regarding initial approach path • RNP adds additional flexibility vs RNAV, but lower equipage levels • 14

  15. 4R Low-Noise Overwater RNP Approach: MIT ICAT Noise Exposure Population Exposure (L MAX ) 60dB 65dB 70dB Aircraft B737-800 Straight In 30,239 7,468 530 Metric L A,MAX Modified 6,887 2,161 0 Procedure Noise Model AEDT Reduction 23,352 5,307 530 Notes Standard AEDT arrival profile 15

  16. Continuous Descents and Steeper Approaches 16

  17. MIT ILS Runway 4R ICAT 4L Arrivals 2017 Arrivals 4R Arrivals Notes: • 2017 Arrival Counts (jet & prop): Rwy 4R: 39,615 Rwy 4L: 12,311 • Figure shows 10% of all 2017 arrivals selected at random • Data Source: Flight Tracks, Massport Noise and Operations Management System (NOMS) 17

  18. MIT Baseline Altitude Profile from 2015/2016 ASDEX Radar Profile ICAT BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS AL-58 (FAA) 17285 LOC/DME I-BOS 8851 Rwy ldg APP CRS ILS or LOC RWY 4R 110.3 18 TDZE 035° (BOS) 19 GENERAL EDWARD LAWRENCE LOGAN INTL 40 Apt Elev Chan T Circling NA for Cats C and D west of Rwys 4L and 15R. Circling NA to Rwy 14. ALSF-2 MISSED APPROACH: Climb For inoperative ALS, increase S-ILS 4R all Cats visibility to RVR 6000, and # to 3000 on BOS VOR/DME A S-LOC 4R Cats A and B visibility to RVR 5000; Rwy 4R helicopter visibility below R-030 to WAXEN INT/BOS A 4000 RVR NA. When vessels taller than 144 feet present, S-ILS 4R NA. 14 DME and hold. D-ATIS ASDEX-All A320s on 4R (20 days of data) BOSTON APP CON BOSTON TOWER GND CON CLNC DEL CPDLC 135.0 120.6 263.1 128.8 257.8 121.9 121.65 257.8 MISSED APCH FIX ALTERNATE MISSED APCH FIX RADAR REQUIRED 1 1 1 1 4 4 0 . C h 4 ° . 4 3 M 0 R M 0 a - H T 1 C h 1 - n H T 4 9 2 ° 5 R a 1 n 0 531 0 3 9 1 1 4 3 0 5 I-BOS I WAXEN 0 ° - B S O R 256 S 3 BOS 14 O R - S 2 4 1 B 0 5 LOCALIZER 110.3 4 WAXEN 161 7 O 4 ° 515 3 5 7 B 2 . 0 n 7 - MHT 26.4 a 7 2 . n R C h 1 a 1 C h Chan 40 1 639 46 1 217 925 700 IM B MM 333 O S IRSEW 176 1447 I-BOS 3.8 BOSTON NE-1, 01 MAR 2018 to 29 MAR 2018 NE-1, 01 MAR 2018 to 29 MAR 2018 RADAR 112.7 BOS Chan 74 MILTT I-BOS 6.9 RADAR ° 0 990 5 0 7 3 5 ) 1 0 ( NABBO B O S 2 5 A N S I-BOS 11.9 M M RADAR ° 0 1 2 2000 5 0 5 ° 0 3 5 ) 3 (IF) 0 ( 2500 WINNI ° I-BOS 16.9 5 3 RADAR ELEV 19 D TDZE 18 0 215° 3000 WAXEN 66 VGSI and ILS glidepath not coincident R L (VGSI Angle 3.00/TCH 67). 2 2 WINNI BOS 1 2 2 5 R R-030 I-BOS 16.9 A 5 NABBO MILTT A 4 1 RADAR 5 P I-BOS 11.9 I-BOS 6.9 L P IRSEW LOC only. P 2557 X 100 RADAR RADAR * TWR I-BOS 3.8 R 4000 3 0 I-BOS 317 3 3 5 RADAR ° 1700 4 0 6 0 5 * I-BOS 8 5 1 1.8 7 1 1 X 3000 2.9 X 0 0 6 7 8 P 0 X 3 2 MM 0 1 5 45 0 0 P 1 1 P 1700 *700 IM 4 4 P 5 0 L X 1 GS 3.00° 1 0 0 5 9 7 0 TCH 51 0 0 A X 1 L 0 0 3 5 NM 5 NM 3.1 NM 0.9 0.2 0.2 A 0.7 3 4 R CATEGORY A B C D P 2 3 035° 5.1 NM S-ILS 4R 218/18 200 (200- ) 12 TDZ/CL Rwys from FAF 12 34 4R, 15R and 33L S-LOC 4R 440/24 422 (500- ) 440/40 422 (500- ) REIL Rwys 4L, 27 and 32 960-1 1 1060-1 12 640-1 34 640-2 4 CIRCLING MIRL Rwy 15L-33R 14 12 34 941 (1000-1 ) 1041 (1100-1 ) 621 (700-1 ) 621 (700-2) HIRL Rwys 4L-22R, 4R-22L, APPROACH MINIMA WHEN CONTROL TOWER REPORTS TALL 9-27, 14-32 and 15R-33L VESSELS IN APPROACH AREA FAF to MAP 5.1 NM 34 S-ILS 4R # 374/40 356 (400- ) Knots 60 90 120 150 180 34 Min:Sec S-LOC 4R # 440/40 422 (500- ) 5:06 3:24 2:33 2:02 1:42 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS (BOS) GENERAL EDWARD LAWRENCE LOGAN INTL Amdt 10C 12OCT17 42°22'N-71°00'W ILS or LOC RWY 4R 18

Recommend


More recommend