biosolids program evaluation
play

Biosolids Program Evaluation Walworth County Metropolitan (WalCoMet) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Biosolids Program Evaluation Walworth County Metropolitan (WalCoMet) Sewerage District Tom Foley, P.E. Omkar Ghavi, P.E. BACKGROUND WalCoMet Background Serves 11 entities including Elkorn, Delavan, Darien, Williams Bay 7.0 MGD/ 20.2


  1. Biosolids Program Evaluation Walworth County Metropolitan (WalCoMet) Sewerage District Tom Foley, P.E. Omkar Ghavi, P.E.

  2. BACKGROUND

  3. WalCoMet Background › Serves 11 entities including Elkorn, Delavan, Darien, Williams Bay › 7.0 MGD/ 20.2 MGD › Class “B” liquid land application Walworth County Metropolitan Sewerage District

  4. WalCoMet Background Walworth County Metropolitan Sewerage District

  5. Existing Biosolids Process

  6. Existing Biosolids Program › Biosolids applied to WalCoMet owned farm (300 ac) or to nearby farm fields ($) › Approximately 4,000,000 gallons land applied yearly

  7. Goals › Analyze existing program and alternatives › Develop financial model › Identify low cost solutions › Provide recommendations

  8. Biosolids Disposal Issues › Late harvest jeopardizes fall land application › Potential future issues: – Limited land availability – More stringent regulations – Increased solids production – Rising resource costs

  9. Alternatives › Continued liquid land application › Dewatering & land application › Dewatering & landfilling › Class “A” sludge production – Composting – Lime Stabilization – Heat Drying – Thermophilic Digestion – Thermal Hydrolysis

  10. Financial Modeling Tool › Input operating cost parameters › Track costs over 20 year planning period › View costs over time for the modeled alternatives

  11. FINANCIAL MODEL DEVELOPMENT

  12. Financial Model Parameters Parameters & More Parameters Finan ancial cial Model

  13. Financial Model Development › Financial Model Components – Process – Economics › Adjustment to Input Parameters – Compare Scenarios › Quantity Costs for Alternatives – Capital Costs – O&M Costs – Present Value Costs

  14. Financial Model • Planning Parameters • Capital Costs • O&M Costs  Labor  Electricity  Fuel  Chemical Financial • Revenue Data • Escalation Operating Data Sludge Management • Sludge  Daily Production  Handling • Sludge Hauling Scenarios  Stabilization  Land Application • No. of Units  Land Acquisition • Operating Hours  Landfilling • Chemicals  Outside Haulers Class A Biosolids Revenue •

  15. Financial Model

  16. Process Model Sludge Production Model Output Operational • Annual Solids Process Parameters (Class A/ Class B) Model • Consumables (Chemicals, Power, Natural Gas, Fuel, etc.) Treatment Performance

  17. Process Model Mass Balance

  18. Model Output

  19. Model Output

  20. Model Output

  21. SCENARIOS

  22. Liquid Land Application $14,000,000 1 On Farm 5 $12,000,000 Haul <5 mi 2 Haul >5 mi 3 3 Cumulative Life Cycle Cost $10,000,000 4 Land Acquisition 4 2 Outside Hauler 5 1 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 Year

  23. Land Acquisition $12,000,000 $10,000,000 Cumulative Life Cycle Cost $8,000,000 Haul 10 miles $6,000,000 Land Acquisition $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036

  24. Land Acquisition $12,000,000 $10,000,000 Cumulative Life Cycle Cost $8,000,000 Haul 15 miles $6,000,000 Land Acquisition $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036

  25. Liquid vs Solid Application $14,000,000 6 1 On Farm 2 Haul <5 mi $12,000,000 3 Haul >5 mi 5 4 Land Acquisition $10,000,000 3 5 Dewatering Cumulative Life Cycle Cost 4 2 6 Landfilling 1 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 Year

  26. Liquid vs Solid Application $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 Cumulative Life Cycle Cost $8,000,000 Dewatering Haul/Land Apply on Farm $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036

  27. Liquid vs Solid Application $14,000,000 $12,000,000 Cumulative Life Cycle Analysis $10,000,000 $8,000,000 Dewatering (2x Fuel) Haul 15 miles (2x Fuel) $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036

  28. Liquid vs Solid Application $14,000,000 $12,000,000 Cumulative Life Cycle Analysis $10,000,000 $8,000,000 Dewatering (2x Fuel) Haul 15 miles (2x Fuel) $6,000,000 Land Acquisition (2x fuel) $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036

  29. Class “A” Alternatives $20 Millions Option B-1 Liquid Sludge Hauling A-4 Option B-2 Dewatering/Solids Hauling A-5 $18 Option A-1 Sludge Composting A-2 Option A-2 Heat Drying $16 A-3 Option A-3 Lime Stabilization Option A-4 Thermophilic Digester $14 A-1 Option A-5 Thermal Hydrolysis Cumulative Life Cycle Cost $12 B-2 $10 B-1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Year

  30. Recommendations › Current biosolids program is the lowest cost and proven option – Land acquisition and crop rotation will help ensure long term success › Capital costs of alternatives outweigh potential savings over a 20 year outlook › Monitor operation and maintenance costs using the model to track trends

  31. Questions? › Tom Foley – tom.foley@clarkdietz.com › Omkar Ghavi – omkar.ghavi@clarkdietz.com

Recommend


More recommend