belbin team roles
play

Belbin Team Roles Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Working in Teams Belbin Team Roles Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 1 Full Time Working in Teams Session Guide Belbin team types Implications / issues Action planning Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh


  1. Working in Teams Belbin Team Roles Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 1 Full Time

  2. Working in Teams Session Guide Belbin team types Implications / issues Action planning Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 2 Full Time

  3. Working in Teams Context Research by Meredith Belbin Effective Teams Key Roles for Success Situation Dependent Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 3 Full Time

  4. Working in Teams Roles Contribution to Team Allowable Weaknesses All of equal value Dropped Points Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 4 Full Time

  5. Working in Teams Leadership Roles Shaper Co-ordinator Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 5 Full Time

  6. Working in Teams Creative Roles Plant Resource Investigator Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 6 Full Time

  7. Working in Teams ……the other Roles Monitor Evaluator Implementer Completer Finisher Team Worker Specialist Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 7 Full Time

  8. Working in Teams Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 8 Full Time

  9. Working in Teams Exercise On the walls are summaries of your Belbin profiles See if you can identify your profile from the summary Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 9 Full Time

  10. Working in Teams Group exercise • In your groups 1. Individuals should share their key learning points 2. Are there any implications for your current teamworking style? Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 10 Full Time

  11. Working in Teams Belbin research findings Roles can equally be applied to non-managers Fisher, Hunter & Macrosson Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.17 No.1, (2002) Balanced teams perform better than biased teams Shapers vs. Balanced Pritchard & Stanton Journal of Management Development, Vol 18, No.8, (1999) No correlation between salary/status and team role Dulewicz Journal of Occupational & Organisational Psychology Vol 68, Issue 2 (1995 ) Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 11 Full Time

  12. Working in Teams Belbin in UK Managers 1441 male / 355 female Predicting team roles from established personality profiles High validity suggested Findings: 1. Suggested surplus of co-coordinators and resource investigators 2. Suggested dearth of Completers, Monitor Evaluators , Plants and Shapers ……relatively few who have this as a primary or secondary role. 3. Lack of the balanced teams in UK industry Fisher, Hunter & Macrosson Personnel Review, Vol.29 No.2, (2000) Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 12 Full Time

  13. Working in Teams Belbin Team Types Resource Plant Ideas Investigator Monitor Co-ordinator Optimal Evaluator Solution Clear goals, Shaper Specialist objectives Completer Work Implementer finisher Success Team Worker Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 13 Full Time

  14. Working in Teams Belbin and Career Management Team Role Career Planning Job Search Written Selection Pro-active Application Process Follow-up Plant Strong on ideas Research Potentially May lack focus Feedback seen strong unorthodox May compete as irrelevant May lack focus Insensitive to with others Learning Networking company needs Insensitive to minimised weak company needs Resource Strong on ideas Networking Uncomfortable Thrives on OK Investigator strong with medium group activities May become disillusioned OK OK Finds self- May undersell Strength Co-ordinator marketing self difficult Prefers group activities Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 14 Full Time

  15. Working in Teams Belbin and Career Management Team Role Career Planning Job Search Written Selection Pro-active Application Process Follow-up Shaper Action focus- High May oversell May oversell Feedback seen less emphasis expectations achievements self as irrelevant on planning and self belief May compete Learning May set with others minimised unrealistic goals Monitor Tends to over- May be Prone to too Dislikes Tends to over- Evaluator analyse indecisive much detail deadlines analyse May be May be Own harshest indecisive indecisive critic Team Worker May be OK Finds self- Prefers group Accepts indecisive marketing activities feedback difficult May undersell self Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 15 Full Time

  16. Working in Teams Belbin and Career Management Team Role Career Planning Job Search Written Selection Pro-active Application Process Follow-up Implementer May be OK OK May lack OK inflexible and creativity lack motivation Completer May be May be Prone to too Avoids Tends to over- Finisher inflexible and indecisive much detail leadership analyse indecisive High anxiety May be indecisive Specialist Narrow May not Prone to too May constrain May perspective may consider wider much detail and input to underestimate limit options jargon specialism relevance opportunities Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 16 Full Time

  17. Working in Teams Summary Insight into our own team role allows us to work on our � strengths and weaknesses A knowledge of team roles helps us build balanced teams � A knowledge of team roles helps us develop more � effective teams "When he took time to help the man up the mountain, lo, he scaled it himself.“ Tibetan Proverb Semester 1 2004 University of Edinburgh Management School 17 Full Time

Recommend


More recommend