ay
play

AY , , AN URRENT NT ST STATUS OF AND CONDITIONS TH CO THAT OY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 06, 2023 •144 likes •534 views

C URRE OF A PA PALACHICOLA B AY AY , , AN URRENT NT ST STATUS OF AND CONDITIONS TH CO THAT OY OYSTERS NE NEED TO TO TH THRIVE San andra B a Brooke P Ph.D. ABSI S Science D Director Resear arch F Fac aculty, F FSUCML M ARCH 11,

  1. C URRE OF A PA PALACHICOLA B AY AY , , AN URRENT NT ST STATUS OF AND CONDITIONS TH CO THAT OY OYSTERS NE NEED TO TO TH THRIVE San andra B a Brooke P Ph.D. ABSI S Science D Director Resear arch F Fac aculty, F FSUCML M ARCH 11, 2020

  2. B ASELINE D ATA De Definition : Baseline data serves as the foundation of most research projects. It is the information generated before a study, to compare with results after the study. S OME E LEMENTS OF ABSI B ASELINE D ATA Fishery species Habitat maps Non-fishery species Environmental conditions Hydrology Oyster distribution Ecological function Oyster harvest data Ecosystem services Re-shelling/restoration

  3. I NTERTIDAL HABITAT MAPS Grizzle et al 2018 FSUCML-ABSI 2020

  4. S UBTIDAL HABITAT MAPS

  5. E NVIRONMENTAL C ONDITIONS ANERR Aquatic Preserve

  6. E NVIRONMENTAL C ONDITIONS ANERR Aquatic Preserve

  7. E NVIRONMENTAL C ONDITIONS Alligator Harbor Salinity Sept 2019 Oct 2019 35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 Nov 2019 Dec 2019 ANERR 35 35 30 30 Aquatic Preserve 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0

  8. I NTERTIDAL HABITAT MAPS Grizzle et al 2018

  9. I NTERTIDAL O YSTER DISTRIBUTION Intertidal (Grizzle et al 2018) Density = 34 m -2 Density = 429 m -2 Density = 993 m -2

  10. I NTERTIDAL O YSTER DISTRIBUTION Intertidal (Grizzle et al 2018) Density = 34 m -2 FWC surveys of subtidal reefs in 2016 found only 66 of 161 sampling stations on mapped reefs had oysters FWC data show that live oyster densities on the subtidal reefs averaged ~17 oysters m 2 Density = 429 m -2 Density = 993 m -2

  11. S UBTIDAL O YSTER DISTRIBUTION M. Parker FWRI unpubl data.

  12. S UBTIDAL O YSTER DISTRIBUTION 350 300 Winter West Oysters / m 2 250 200 150 100 50 0 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 n l n l n l n l n l n u u u u u a a a a a a J J J J J J J J J J J M. Parker FWRI unpubl data.

  13. S UBTIDAL O YSTER DISTRIBUTION 350 300 Winter West Oysters / m 2 250 200 150 100 50 0 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 n l n l n l n l n l n u u u u u a a a a a a J J J J J J J J J J J 350 300 Summer Oysters / m 2 250 200 150 100 50 0 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 n l n l n l n l n l n u u u u u a a a a a a J J J J J J J J J J J M. Parker FWRI unpubl data.

  14. S UBTIDAL O YSTER DISTRIBUTION 350 300 Winter West Oysters / m 2 250 200 150 100 50 0 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 n l n l n l n l n l n u u u u u a a a a a a J J J J J J J J J J J 350 300 Summer Oysters / m 2 250 200 150 100 50 0 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 n l n l n l n l n l n u u u u u a a a a a a J J J J J J J J J J J 350 300 Winter East Oysters / m 2 250 200 150 100 50 0 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 n l n l n l n l n l n u u u u u a a a a a a J J J J J J J J J J J

  15. S UBTIDAL O YSTER RECRUITS 50 Winter West 40 Spat / Shell 30 20 10 0 Jan 2015 Jul 2015 Jan 2016 Jul 2016 Jan 2017 Jul 2017 Jan 2018 Jul 2018 Jan 2019 Jul 2019 Jan 2020 M. Parker FWRI unpubl data.

  16. S UBTIDAL O YSTER RECRUITS 50 Winter West 40 Spat / Shell 30 20 10 0 Jan 2015 Jul 2015 Jan 2016 Jul 2016 Jan 2017 Jul 2017 Jan 2018 Jul 2018 Jan 2019 Jul 2019 Jan 2020 50 Summer Spat / Shell 0 Jan 2015 Jul 2015 Jan 2016 Jul 2016 Jan 2017 Jul 2017 Jan 2018 Jul 2018 Jan 2019 Jul 2019 Jan 2020 M. Parker FWRI unpubl data.

  17. S UBTIDAL O YSTER RECRUITS 50 Winter West 40 Spat / Shell 30 20 10 0 Jan 2015 Jul 2015 Jan 2016 Jul 2016 Jan 2017 Jul 2017 Jan 2018 Jul 2018 Jan 2019 Jul 2019 Jan 2020 50 Summer Spat / Shell 0 Jan 2015 Jul 2015 Jan 2016 Jul 2016 Jan 2017 Jul 2017 Jan 2018 Jul 2018 Jan 2019 Jul 2019 Jan 2020 50 Winter East 40 Spat / Shell 30 20 10 0 Jan 2015 Jul 2015 Jan 2016 Jul 2016 Jan 2017 Jul 2017 Jan 2018 Jul 2018 Jan 2019 Jul 2019 Jan 2020

  18. O YSTER H ARVEST D ATA

  19. R E - SHELLING /R ESTORATION

  20. F ISHERY S PECIES Silver perch ( Bairdiella chrysoura ) Data from FWC FIM surveys

  21. F ISHERY S PECIES Shrimp ( Farfantepenaeus spp ) Data from FWC FIM surveys

  22. F ISHERY SPECIES Mullet ( Mugil cephalus ) Data from FWC FIM surveys

  23. N ON - FISHERY S PECIES Pinfish ( Lagodon rhomboides ) Data from FWC FIM surveys

  24. N ON - FISHERY S PECIES Gobies ( Gobiosoma spp ) Data from FWC FIM surveys

  25. B ASELINE D ATA De Definition : Baseline data serves as the foundation of most research projects. It is the information generated before a study, to compare with results after the study. S OME E LEMENTS OF ABSI B ASELINE D ATA Fishery species Habitat maps Non-fishery species Environmental conditions Hydrology Oyster distribution Ecological function Oyster harvest data Ecosystem services Re-shelling/restoration

  26. Causes of Oyster Declines in Gulf of Mexico Overharvesting • Habitat loss • High salinities/reduced freshwater input • Predation • Diseases • Climate change? •

  27. What do oysters need to thrive? Oyster habitat suitability varies with location in an estuary Characteristic Estuarine location Head Middle Lower Mouth Salinity (ppt) Average 10 15 25 30 Range 0-15 10-20 10-30 20-35 Spat settlement Low Moderate-heavy Moderate Low Growth rate Slow-rapid Moderate-rapid Rapid Slow Habitat suitability Low Maximum Moderate Low Probability of flood High Low-moderate Low Negligible Predator abundance Low Low-moderate Moderate High Fouling organisms Low Moderate Maximum High Annual mortality rate High Low-moderate High High Production potential Low Moderate-high Moderate Negligible

  28. What do oysters need to thrive? Oyster habitat suitability varies with location in an estuary Characteristic Location within estuary Head Middle Lower Mouth Salinity (ppt) Average 10 15 25 30 Range 0-15 10-20 10-30 20-35 Spat settlement Low Moderate-heavy Moderate Low Growth rate Slow-rapid Moderate-rapid Rapid Slow Habitat suitability Low Maximum Moderate Low Probability of flood High Low-moderate Low Negligible Predator abundance Low Low-moderate Moderate High Fouling organisms Low Moderate Maximum High Annual mortality rate High Low-moderate High High Production potential Low Moderate-high Moderate Negligible

  29. Reduced freshwater flows Sources of freshwater loss: • Atlanta removes 2 billion liters/day • Agricultural withdrawals elsewhere • Severe drought US SE (2007-2014 ) Lake Lanier 2007

  30. Low to moderate salinity predators Cownose ray ( Rhinotera bonasus ) Sheepshead ( Archosargus probatocephalus ) Blue crab ( Callinectes sapidus )

  31. High salinity predators Atlantic oyster drill ( Thais haemastoma ) • Oyster drills are the most important oyster predators in the Gulf of Mexico • Can destroy > 50% of a population in waters > 15 ppt • Populations can be very high • Drills prefer spat and small adults Oyster ‘leeches’ ( Stylochus inimicus ) • This is a flatworm not a leech. • Enter between the mantle and shell and consume tissue. • Oysters generate partitions to keep them away from soft tissue • Worms can tolerate extreme high (40 o C) and low (1 o C) temperatures • They cannot tolerate low salinity

  32. Effects of mobile predators are more difficult to assess than more sessile predators Predation by mobile organisms increases with high salinity. Stone crab ( Menippe mercenaria ) crabs consume any size oyster they can break open Black drum ( Pogonias cromis ) Black drum consume small-medium oysters

  33. Boring sponge ( Cliona sp ) • Bores into the shell and looks unattractive • Weakened shells break apart on shucking • Heavy infestations may cause mortality by creating pathways for predators • Problem in > 15 ppt salinity Shell damage reduces market value

  34. Oyster Diseases: Dermo ( Perkinsus marinus) Healthy Infected with Dermo Single-celled protozoan Infection peaks at age 1-2 years Causes cell death, reduced reproduction and mortality High infestations can devastate oyster populations, especially largest. Disease may become self-limiting Not lethal at low levels

  35. Seasonal cycles of Dermo infection Spring: Infective spores appear Summer : Infections observed Fall : Peak infections and mortality Late winter-early spring : Infections low but parasites overwinter and appear in spring Te Tempe mperatur rature and salinity ar and salinity are most impor most important f tant factor actors f s for inf or infection ction High temp (18 o C/65 o F) and salinity (>15 ppt) – parasite increases rapidly Low temp (15 o C/59 o F) and salinity (<9 ppt ) – parasite infection is low.

Recommend

More recommend