A STRATEGIC VIEW ON Three studies & a framework Fay Cook Dawn - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A STRATEGIC VIEW ON Three studies & a framework Fay Cook Dawn Tilbury Fae Korsmo Suzi Iacono

ENGAGING NASEM ASSESS PAUSE 60 DAYS DEVELOP IMPACTS PROCESSES Effective 9/23/15 to 12/15 • Address management concerns Initial data analysis about costs Charge WG Report • Allow for agency-wide Develop SOPs for new NASEM recommendations coordination proposals and actions • Avoid duplication Change policy guidelines • Sort out funding types Communicate changes to staff IMPORTANT TAKEAWAY Over two years, NSF has set up routine processes for tracking investments and assessing impacts. 2

STAFFING THE TEAM • Joan M. Frye/OIA (co- • Cassandra Dudka/OISE (co-chair) chair) • Sohi Rastegar/ENG • Bob Fleischmann/BIO • Pam Hawkins/BFA • Nicholas Anderson/GEO • Beth Strausser/Policy • Leah Nichols/OIA • Clark Cooper/MPS • Amy Friedlander/CISE • Deborah Olster/SBE • Theresa Garner/DACS • Eamonn Kelly/EHR 3

UNDERSTANDING NSF INVESTMENTS 2011-2016 10% 5% 44% 35% Percent by $ amount Core Support Consensus Study Round Table / Forum Workshop with Report Workshop without Report Letter Report Dues Other 4

COORDINATION TOOLS NASEM AWARDS TRACKER Upcoming report releases Clickable links to NA and associated briefings reports Upcoming meetings and events IMPORTANT TAKEAWAY Provides up-to-date information on NASEM activities supported by NSF awards 5 5

COORDINATION TOOLS NASEM IMPACTS TRACKER Summary of major Summary of NSF response recommendations to recommendations NASEM NASEM Report Recommendations Report Pub Date IMPORTANT TAKEAWAY Provides initial look at return on investment for NSF 6 6

THANKS! 7