21st century state declarations
play

21st Century State Declarations F. A. Queirolo, A. Rialhe, W. Mandl, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

21st Century State Declarations F. A. Queirolo, A. Rialhe, W. Mandl, J. Ng Symposium of International Safeguards 2014-10-21 IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Purpose of this presentation Provide SGIMs perspective on modernizing the


  1. 21st Century State Declarations F. A. Queirolo, A. Rialhe, W. Mandl, J. Ng Symposium of International Safeguards 2014-10-21 IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

  2. Purpose of this presentation Provide SGIM’s perspective on modernizing the transmission and processing of State submissions. Including: • Current transmission methods and areas for improvement • SGIM conceptual requirements • Current IAEA-SG IT landscape overview • Future outlook IAEA

  3. Background • SGIM: “The Backbone for State Declared Information Management and Analysis” • Manages State declarations which are submitted in multiple forms and mediums • Increasing volume of State reporting • Expanding amount of unstructured information (e.g. Additional Protocols, Small Quantity Protocols, etc.) IAEA 3

  4. SGIM – The Department’s Clearing House The Department’s Centre for State Declared Information SQP 2005 Inventories 1998 NAMIS 1997 Trafficking DB 1997 Additional Protocol 1993 Voluntary Reporting Scheme 1974 Import/Export Notifications (INFCIRC/207) 1971 NPT Nuclear Material Accounting (INFCIRC/153) 1968 Non-NPT Nuclear Material Accounting (INFCIRC/66) IAEA NAMIS = Np Am Monitoring Information System

  5. Stakeholders • SRA*: submits declaration, provides clarifications, responds to questions, resolves omissions • SG (including SGIM): intake, processing, analyzing, inspections • IAEA non-SG (ARMS): Processes a copy of the State declaration *SRA - State or Regional Authority responsible IAEA 5 for safeguards implementation

  6. Current Transmission Methods Declarations are currently transmitted via: • Encrypted email sent to IAEA • Physical Transfer- hand carried by inspectors or State representatives to IAEA: digital media or paper • Post- mailed via post/package delivery company (e.g. DHL): digital media (CD, USB), or paper • Fax: “hard copy that is hard to read” IAEA 6

  7. Current Transmission Paths IAEA

  8. Current Site Plan path to SG IAEA 8

  9. Current Issues with All Transfer Methods • Labour intensive process • All declarations require some level of formatting/QC before inputting into our DB • Acknowledgement processes is paper based • Security/Confidentiality Overhead • Paper: ARMS/SG • Electronic: Encryption/Certificates • Languages (UN has 6) IAEA 9

  10. Issues with current mediums of transfer • Paper declarations • Completely manual entry • Additional work for non-text • Confidentiality Overhead (ARMS  SG) • Legibility (faxes) • Tracking • Electronic declarations • 1-way communication • Varied file formats and standards IAEA 10

  11. Desired Functionality • 2-way communication • SRA submits State declaration and can respond to requests for clarification • IAEA-SG acknowledges receipt and can request clarification • Automatically perform basic QC • Required & data validation • Alerts SRA user of potential errors, and allows corrections before submission IAEA 11

  12. Desired Functionality (cont.) • Security • As required user accounts for SRA users • User/password administration for SRA and IAEA-SG admin • Backwards compatibility and interoperability • SRA contact list IAEA 12

  13. Desired future workflow IAEA

  14. Landscape - IT Security • Connections to SG are only permitted from inspectors laptop (VPN) or IAEA equipment to the SG LAN (or DMZ in special cases) • All State declarations will reside on ISE (a secure network) • ISE and Information Classification policies are being updated IAEA 14

  15. Landscape – IT Infrastructure • Agency-wide LAN: SG Confidential data and above could not reside there (SPRICS 2.0) • SG-LAN: non IAEA-SG equipment can not access it (remote monitoring equipment) • “Member State Data Submission Hub” (MSDSH) – conceptual stage Strong consideration will be given to re-using existing SG services and integration of States components IAEA 15

  16. Conclusions • Need for modernization has been recognized and there have been primarily individual efforts to date • IAEA SG is looking for an extensible unified solution which is compatible with existing State NMAC* systems • Collaboration with States is necessary for project scoping, funding, requirements gathering, and integration *Nuclear Material Accounting and Control IAEA 16

Recommend


More recommend