would a business judgment rule help directors sleep
play

Would A Business Judgment Rule Help Directors Sleep Better at - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Would A Business Judgment Rule Help Directors Sleep Better at Night? By Low Chee Keong Associate Professor in Corporate Law CUHK Business School, Hong Kong www. www.ic icdm.com.my IN THE BEGINNING Their Lordships accept that it


  1. Would A Business Judgment Rule Help Directors Sleep Better at Night? By Low Chee Keong Associate Professor in Corporate Law CUHK Business School, Hong Kong www. www.ic icdm.com.my

  2. IN THE BEGINNING … Their Lordships … accept that it would be wrong for the court to substitute its opinion for that of the management, or indeed to question the correctness of the management’s decisions … if bona fide arrived at. … nor will courts of law assume to act as a kind of supervisory board over decisions within the powers of management honestly arrived at. Lord Wilberforce Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum [1974] AC 821 at 832 2

  3. ONLINE POLLING Step #1 Go to www.slido.com Step #2 Enter Event Name as powertalk2 Step #3 Select Polls 3

  4. WITH THAT IN MIND … Do you think that the current duties expected of directors are : A Too onerous B Just right C Too lenient 4

  5. WITH THAT IN MIND… Do you think that it is not easy to successfully sue a director for breach of duty to the company? A Yes B No 5

  6. SECTION 213(2) ‘OBJECTIVE PLUS’ The ‘ Objective ’ Directors must exercise the knowledge, skills and experience that would reasonably be expected of a director carrying out the same functions. The ‘ Plus ’ The director must also bring his or her own general knowledge, skills and expertise to the table. 6

  7. S & E C’ B’ A’ A B C 7

  8. CASE STUDIES COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY A B C 8

  9. ON REFLECTION …. Do you think that the current duties expected of directors are : A Too onerous B Just right C Too lenient 9

  10. WITH THAT IN MIND… Do you think that it is not easy to successfully sue a director for breach of duty to the company? A Yes B No 10

  11. SECTION 214 COMPANIES ACT A director who makes a business judgment is deemed to meet the requirements of the duty under subsection 213(2) and the equivalent duties under the common law and in equity if the director – • makes the business judgment for a proper purpose and in good faith; • does not have a material personal interest in the subject matter of the business judgment; • is informed about the subject matter of the business judgment to the extent the director reasonably believes to be appropriate under the circumstances; and • reasonably believes that the business judgment is in the best interest of the company. 11

  12. WITH THAT IN MIND … Do you think that the Business Judgment Rule is: A Too complicated B Just right C Too simplistic 12

  13. WITH THAT IN MIND… Do you think that the Business Judgment Rule would be of any benefit to directors? A Yes B No 13

  14. THE RATIONALE The Delaware Yankee ALI – A Different Yankee The Aussie way 14

  15. THE DELAWARE YANKEE A ‘ Safe Harbour Rule ’ that is strictly not a rule Conserves judicial resources by The Delaware Yankee protecting decisions made ‘a presumption that in making a • free of disabling conflicts of business decision the directors of interest a corporation acted on an ALI – A Different Yankee informed basis, in good faith and in • with exercise of some (not the honest belief that the action necessarily reasonable) care was taken in the best interests of The Aussie way • on a rational (not necessarily the corporation’ reasonable) basis Aronson v Lewis Cede & Co v Technicolor, Inc 473 A.2d 805 (Del. 1984) at 812 634 A.2d 345 (Del. 1993 ) 15

  16. ALI – A DIFFERENT YANKEE • An affirmative or independent judgment The Delaware Yankee • Must be informed with some care – not due care • An absence of disabling conflicts of interest ALI – A Different Yankee • A rational basis for the decision The Aussie way • Good faith – the ‘ smell test ’ surrogate J 16

  17. THE AUSSIE WAY Section 180(2) Corporations Act • must make a decision: sec 180(3) • judgment in good faith for proper purpose • no material personal interest • informed about the subject matter • possesses a rational belief that the decision is in the best interest of company ASIC v Rich (2009) 75 ASCR 1 ASIC v Mariner Corporation (2015) FCA 589 17

  18. LET’S PAUSE AND PONDER Which model do you prefer? A. B. C. DELAWARE ALI AUSSIE Why? 18

  19. THE MALAYSIAN HYBRID • Courts are ill equipped to review business decisions a process which is compounded by corporate ownership landscape with dominance of family & state • Fusion to allow directors to have two bites of the cherry § The Yankee to scrutinise the decision making process § The Aussie to assess the general state of knowledge • NOT a legal transplant but Malaysia (Boleh)- centric 19

  20. LET’S RETHINK … Which model do you prefer? A. B. C. DELAWARE ALI AUSSIE D. MALAYSIAN HYBRID 20

  21. WITH THAT IN MIND … Do you think that the Business Judgment Rule is: A Too complicated B Just right C Too simplistic 21

  22. WITH THAT IN MIND… Do you think that the Business Judgment Rule would be of any benefit to directors? A Yes B No 22

  23. FURTHER READING Low Chee Keong & Low Tak Hay The Business Judgment Rule: A Safe Harbour for Directors? Journal of the Malaysian Judiciary 159- 191 (January 2018) Available at http://www.jac.gov.my/images/journal_malaysian_judiciary/jan2018.pdf 23

  24. MORE READING Low Chee Keong & Low TakYip When is the Board Accountable for Delegation and Reliance? A Case Study of the MTR Corporation [2016] Vol 30 Australian Journal of Corporate Law 285-303 Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2487710 24

  25. THANK YOU 25

  26. Panel Discussion CHEE KEONG LOW Associate Professor in Corporate Law, CUHK Business School PHILIP T.N. KOH Senior Partner, Mah-Kamariyah & Philip Koh DATUK YVONNE CHIA Chairman, Standard Chartered Bank Malaysia Moderated by KAMARUL BAHRIN HARON Deputy Editor-in-Chief, ASTRO AWANI 26

Recommend


More recommend