women deliver 2013
play

Women Deliver 2013 Tech and Tech Tuesday May 28, 2013 Dawn Crosby, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Women Deliver 2013 Tech and Tech Tuesday May 28, 2013 Dawn Crosby, Abt Associates Maggie Louie, Planned Parenthood Global Measuring Capacity To build capacity, it must be measured Existing capacity assessment tools tend to be self-


  1. Women Deliver 2013 Tech and Tech Tuesday May 28, 2013 Dawn Crosby, Abt Associates Maggie Louie, Planned Parenthood Global

  2. Measuring Capacity  To build capacity, it must be measured  Existing capacity assessment tools tend to be self- assessment oriented and/or adjectival  Numerical industry averages would allow for benchmarking  There is a need for a quantitative tool which measures capacity and sustainability in a consistent and objective manner and creates a comparability function impetus for developing the ProCapacity Index™

  3. The ProCapacity Index™ – a different tool • Mixed methods tool which uses a balanced scorecard approach; comprised of 28 indicators across three pillars:  Financial Strength  Programmatic Performance  Organizational Development • Data sources include:  Financial statements  Programmatic data (includes clinical data for health clinics version)  Key informant interviews  Employee survey  Client or beneficiary survey  Other sources (e.g. operating manuals, annual/technical reports, by-laws, etc.)

  4. How ProCap Works Financial Strength Score Strength of NGO’s balance sheet and income statement Programmatic Performance Score Overall Score Technical metrics related to social mission of organization 100-point system Organizational Development Score Quality of NGO’s systems, management and staff

  5. A Look at the Tool – Entry Page ProCap Index - Health Clinics 95 - 100 Model 85 - 94 Strong 75 - 84 Stable Name of organization: 55 - 74 Developing 54 and below Fragile Country: MALAWI Date Indexed: May 2012 T otal Score: 40 Fragile Dashboard Financial Strength Programmatic Performance Organizational Development Financial Score Details Programmatic Score Details Organizational Score Details Financial - Raw Data Client Survey Results Employee Survey Results Programmatic - Raw Data Institutional Assessment Results Client Survey – Raw Data Employee Survey – Raw Data

  6. A Look at the Tool - Dashboard Cost Recovery Rate Funding Concentration Percentage Services Revenue Percentage Overhead Rate 100% 100% 100% 100% 60% 130% 60% 130% 60% 130% 60% 130% 200% 0% 200% 0% 0% 200% 0% 0.000 0.000 0.000 200% 0.000 | Industry Average 82% Industry Average 34% Industry Average 54% Industry Average 21% NGO Value 37% NGO Value 41% NGO Value 68% NGO Value 30% \ Client Growth Rate Client Volume Ratio Clinical Efficiency Ratio Client Survey - Satisfaction 100% 100% 100% 100% 130% 60% 130% 60% 60% 130% 60% 130% 200% 0% 200% 0% 0% 0% 200% 0.000 200% 0.000 0.000 0.000 Industry Average 0.03% Industry Average 20% Industry Average 90 Industry Average 4.35 NGO Value -0.3% NGO Value 28% NGO Value 69 NGO Value 4.11 # Employee Survey - Mission Awareness Employee Survey - Satisfaction Employee Survey - Management & Performance Culture Employee Survey - Commitment & Ownership 100% 100% 100% 100% 60% 130% 60% 130% 130% 60% 60% 130% 200% 0% 200% 0.000 40% 0% 200% 40% 150% 0.000 0.000 0.000 Industry Average 59% Industry Average 4.01 Industry Average 3.66 Industry Average 4.01 NGO Value 76% NGO Value 4.06 NGO Value 3.51 NGO Value 4.06

  7. ProCapacity: Advocacy Some Example Indicators Financial Programmatic Organizational Employee Survey Defensive Interval Technical Capacity – Performance – Salaries – Training Culture Funding Collaboration & Expert Concentration & Linkages – Recent Assessment – Diversification Contacts Adaptive Capacity

  8. THANK YOU!!! For more information, please visit the ProCapacity Index™ booth

Recommend


More recommend