wispy dark matter from the top down
play

WISPy dark matter from the top down Mark D. Goodsell LPTHE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other WISPy dark matter from the top down Mark D. Goodsell LPTHE Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other Introduction Reminder of the motivations for WISPs Misalignment production of WISPy


  1. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other WISPy dark matter from the top down Mark D. Goodsell LPTHE

  2. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other Introduction • Reminder of the motivations for WISPs • Misalignment production of WISPy dark matter • Cosmological constraints • Motivation for WISPs in string theory • What properties we might expect ...

  3. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other Axions, ALPs, and Hidden Photons Axions/ALPs: • Periodic fields: φ i ∼ φ i + 2 πf i • Pseudo-Nambu Goldstone bosons of some symmetry • Most important couplings are to QCD (for axion), photons and electrons g 2 e 2 G µν − C iγγ L ⊃ − a F µν + C ei 32 π 2 G µν ˜ 32 π 2 φF µν ˜ 3 eγ µ γ 5 e∂ µ φ i ¯ f a f i 2 f i • Constrained f a � 10 9 GeV, upper bound of 10 12 GeV in absence of dark matter dilution mechanism Hidden photons: • Extend the (MS)SM by at least one U ( 1 ) gauge (super)field: b − θ M L ⊃ χ ab 2 F a µν F µν 8 π 2 F a µν ˜ F µν χ ab λ a σ µ ∂ µ λ b + h . c . ) b + ( i ˜

  4. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other Bottom-up motivation for WISPs For anyone who was asleep yesterday and/or has wandered in to the wrong meeting – many different experiments: • Haloscopes • Helioscopes • Dish antennae • Beam dumps – e.g. the SHiP experiment! • Light shining through walls • Molecular interferometry and of course cosmic searches such as isocurvature and tensor modes, rotation of CMB polarisation, ... • Opportunity to probe weak couplings or very high energy scales!

  5. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other ALPs

  6. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other ALPs: Bottom-up motivation L ⊃ − g 2 e 2 C iγ a C a 3 F µν + C ie 3 F b 3, µν ˜ F b , µν a i F µν ˜ eγ µ γ 5 e∂ µ a i , − ¯ 3 32 π 2 32 π 2 f a f a i 2 f a i • Axion as solution to strong CP problem! • Misalignment dark matter! • For a light ALP( < 10 − 9 eV) anomalous transparency of the universe for VHE gamma rays f i /C iγ ∼ 10 8 GeV • ... and for same value of f i /C iγ , steps is power spectrum at critical energy of 100 GeV, hinting at m ALP ∼ 10 − 9 ÷ 10 − 10 eV. • X-ray hint of ALPs from the Coma cluster (Conlon, Marsh, Powell, ...) f a � 10 10 GeV � 0.5 /∆N eff C aγ • (Now in doubt) solution to non-standard energy loss of white dwarfs f i /C ie ≃ ( 0.2 ÷ 2.6 ) × 10 9 GeV • These are compatible (need C iγ /C ie � 10 ) and could be searched for in future experiments!!

  7. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other Misalignment dark matter • An axion or ALP is a periodic field: it can take any initial value in [ 0, 2 πf a ] since the potential energy in the field is negligible compared to energies in early universe. • During inflation any scalar field will undergo quantum fluctuations of magnitude H I H I 2 π → σ Θ = 2 πf a • At later times, the scalar field behaves classically with equation of motion φ + 3 H ˙ ¨ φ + m 2 φ φ = 0 • While 3 H > m , the field is damped and retains its initial vev. • When 3 H = m , it starts to oscillate and will behave like a bath of particles; the a θ 2 which starts to red-shift like energy stored in the field is 1 2 m 2 φ 2 0 ∼ 1 2 m 2 a f 2 matter ∝ a − 3 . • One complication: for the QCD axion, the mass decreases rapidly as the temperature increases; instanton calculations give m u m d m s Λ 9 QCD → m a ∼ T − 4 V inst ∼ ( πT ) 8

  8. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other ALP vs axion dm • So for the QCD axion we find � 7 / 6 � θ a � 2 Ω a h 2 � f a 0.112 ≃ 6 × 10 12 GeV π • While for an ALP we find � 2 � θ a � m a i � 2 Ω a h 2 � 1 / 2 � f a i 0.112 ≃ 1.4 × × 10 11 GeV eV π This means that the parameter space can be very different: • For the QCD axion we are restricted by dark matter at high f a • The QCD axion always mixes with pions and therefore has restrictions coming from nucleon couplings • It will always have a minimal coupling to electrons and photons coming from this too (more later) which bound f a � 10 9 GeV. • For an ALP , we have no such restrictions except that it should not couple strongly to QCD! • In fact we have a “maximum” allowed coupling to the photon: C a i g iγ ≡ α α � 2 π f a i 2 πf a i • Gives the lifetime of � − 2 � m a i � � − 3 64 π g iγ ≃ 1.3 × 10 25 s τ a i = g 2 iγ m 3 10 − 10 GeV − 1 eV a i

  9. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other DM constraints EBL Axion models ALPS - 6 HB CAST + Sumico - 9 Log 10 g [ GeV - 1 ] τ ALP < 10 17 s γ - burst 1987a x ion Haloscope Optical - 12 Searches m 1 > 3H ( T eq ) m 1 / m 0 =( Λ / T ) β - 15 X - Rays EBL Standard ALP CDM ( m 1 = m 0 ) - 18 - 8 - 5 - 2 1 4 7 Log 10 m ϕ [ eV ]

  10. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other Cosmological constraints There are important cosmological constraints: • Black hole superradiance m a > 3 × 10 − 11 eV (or � 10 − 21 eV) ([ Arvanitaki, Dubovsky ’10]) • Isocurvature – since the axion is effectively massless during inflation its fluctuations correspond to isocurvature, and there are strong constraints: P II β iso = P RR + P II < 0.035 (Planck 2015) • We know that P RR = 2.196 + 0.051 − 0.060 is the amount of primordial fluctuations � Ω a i � 2 P II ≃ 4 σ 2 θ P RR θ 2 Ω m � Ω m � 2 → H I < 2.8 × 10 − 5 θf a i Ω a i � f a � 0.408 → H I < 0.9 × 10 7 GeV QCD axion 10 11 • Also have the constraint from non-observation of tensor modes that 2 H 2 r = P TT /P RR < 0.11 and P TT = I P giving π 2 M 2 H I < 8.3 × 10 13 GeV

  11. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other ALPs in IIB strings � K αβ � � � dc α + M P dc β + M P S ⊃ − π A i q iα ∧ ⋆ π A j q jβ 8 r iα c α tr ( F ∧ F ) − r iα τ α 1 + tr ( F i ∧ ⋆ F i ) . 4 πM P 4 πM P • Axions periodic fields, c α → c α + M P , T α = τ α + ic α ∼ T α + iM P • Decay constants determined by diagonalising ( K 0 ) αβ ≡ ∂ 2 (− 2 log V ) : ∂ τα ∂ τβ f α ≡ M P � λ α , a α ∼ a α + 2 πf α 4 π • Canonically normalise the axion fields αδ ′ = λ − 1 C γ ′ α K αβ C T C γ ′ α C T c α = 2 a γ C βα , βδ ′ = δ γ ′ δ ′ , γ ′ δ γ ′ δ ′ , • Read off couplings to gauge groups: � 1 / 2 f a j M P = 1 U ( 1 ) SU ( N ) . × r jα C T 1 C ji 8 π αi

  12. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other The LARGE Volume Scenario • Type IIB string theory, Complex structure moduli stabilised at SUSY value by three-form fluxes, gives superpotential W 0 • Volume of Calabi-Yau in “swiss-cheese” form V = τ 3 / 2 − τ 3 / 2 − h ( τ i ) s b • Or K 3 -fibration: V = τ 1 / 2 b ′ τ b − τ 3 / 2 − h ( τ i ) s • → Instanton/gaugino condensate generate contribution to superpotential W ⊃ Ae − aτ s , but typically only need one or two! (c.f. KKLT) � � • Kähler potential with α ′ corrections K ⊃ − 2 log ℜ ( τ b ) 3 / 2 + ξ/ 2 , needs h 2,1 > h 1,1 • Volume, τ b stabilised at exponentially large value: V ∼ 10 6 for GUT, ∼ 10 14 for intermediate scale strings, ∼ 10 30 for TeV strings • Small cycle τ s stabilised at aτ s ∼ log V • AdS vacuum with ✘✘ SUSY , small uplift required to dS by anti-branes, D-terms, ✘ F-terms, instantons at quivers ... • (MS)SM realised on D 7 branes on collapsed cycles τ a ∼ 0 (Quiver locus) or � 1 (Geometric regime)

  13. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other The LVS axiverse • For LARGE volume scenario (LVS) need W = W 0 + Ae − aτ dP , W 0 ∼ 1 • τ dP is a diagonal del Pezzo blow-up → removes issue of chirality. • Do not need other NP effects: others can be fixed by D-terms, α ′ and g s effects - open ( V ∼ W 2 V 3 ) and closed ( V ∼ W 2 0 V 4 ) string loops. 0 • Non-vanishing D -terms are dangerous ( V ∼ V − 2 ) but are useful for stabilising cycles relative to each other 1 4 π V q aj t j = 0 → linear combination fixed ξ a = • Each NP term in superpotential and each linearly independent D-term eats one axion • In scenario where LARGE cycle unwrapped/no D-term, have at least n ax = h 1,1 − 1 − d � 1 light axions • Generically this number may be large, particularly if many unwrapped cycles. • Since further single instanton/gaugino condensate contributions may not be generic → very light axions → ALPs.

  14. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other Swiss cheeses

  15. Introduction ALPs Vector dark matter Other Decay constants We expect � M P /τ α non − local axion √ f α ∼ M s ∼ M P / V local axion � � τ 3 / 2 − τ 3 / 2 = τ b ∼ V 2 / 3 and 1 we have 4 πg − 2 e.g. for V = √ s b b 9 2 V − 4 / 3 V − 5 / 3 � � K 0 ∼ V − 5 / 3 V − 1 √ M P M P M P 3 1 M s Have f a b = τ b ≃ 4 π V 2 / 3 , f a s = √ V ≃ . √ √ 4 π 6 ( 2 τ s ) 1 / 4 4 πτ 1 / 4 4 π s L ⊃ c b c s g 2 g 2 b tr ( F b ∧ F b ) + s tr ( F s ∧ F s ) M P M P τ 3 / 4 � � � � � 1 � s ≃ O a b + O a s tr ( F b ∧ F b ) M P V 1 / 2 M P � � � � � � 1 1 + O a b + O a s tr ( F s ∧ F s ) . M P τ 3 / 4 M s s M P • Non-local ALPs can have small decay constants, e.g. V 2 / 3 , but the couplings to matter are always � M P suppressed • If we want ALPs in the classic axion window, they need to be “local,” and have an intermediate string scale: f i ∼ M s ∼ M P V , V ∼ 10 15 . √ • To have an axion and ALP , need several intersecting local cycles

Recommend


More recommend