WHY I’M NOT…
WHY I’M NOT AN ATHEIST
A foot in two worlds
A foot in two worlds
Law school drives critical thinking
Law school drives critical thinking and precision of thought
The Rules of Evidence are based on logic and argumentation theory
Circumstantial Direct Evidence Evidence
Circumstantial Direct Evidence Evidence
Circumstantial Direct Evidence Evidence
Circumstantial Direct Evidence Evidence FRAUD
Circumstantial Direct Evidence Evidence Motive FRAUD
Circumstantial Direct Evidence Evidence Motive opportunity FRAUD
Circumstantial Direct Evidence Evidence Consistent Motive action opportunity FRAUD
CREDIBILITY
CREDIBILITY
The “Burden of Proof”
CREDIBILITY
WHY I’M NOT AN ATHEIST
”ATHEIST” ”AGNOSTIC”
”ATHEIST” ”AGNOSTIC” SCALES OF JUSTICE Weighing the Evidence
”ATHEIST” ”AGNOSTIC” SCALES OF JUSTICE Place all the credible Weighing the Evidence evidence there is no God on one side of the scales and argue from that evidence
”ATHEIST” ”AGNOSTIC” SCALES OF JUSTICE Place all the credible Weighing the Evidence evidence there is no God on one side of the scales and argue from that evidence Evidence for atheism
”ATHEIST” ”AGNOSTIC” SCALES OF JUSTICE Place all the credible Place all the credible Weighing the Evidence evidence there is no evidence there is a God on one side of the God on one side of the scales and argue from scales and argue from that evidence that evidence Evidence for atheism
”ATHEIST” ”AGNOSTIC” SCALES OF JUSTICE Place all the credible Place all the credible Weighing the Evidence evidence there is no evidence there is a God on one side of the God on one side of the scales and argue from scales and argue from that evidence that evidence Evidence Evidence for against atheism
The Four Horsemen of the New Atheism
The Four Horsemen of the New Atheism
The Four Horsemen of the New Atheism
The Four Horsemen of the New Atheism
The Four Horsemen of the New Atheism
Atheism proof or sleight of hand?
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? They shift the They use logical fallacies burden of proof and rhetoric tricks
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? The burden of proof is on whomever is making the assertion They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? “The dragon in my garage” They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? “The dragon in my garage” They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? “The dragon in my garage” They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? “The dragon in my garage” They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? Bertrand Russell’s teapot They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? Bertrand Russell’s teapot They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? “The dragon in my garage” They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? “The dragon in my garage” They shift the burden of proof
Atheism proof or sleight of hand? “The dragon in my garage” They shift the burden of proof
m proof or t of hand? “The dragon in my garage” shift the en of proof
“The dragon in my garage”
“The dragon in my garage”
“The dragon in my garage”
You don’t prove an incorporeal reality like you do a corporeal reality
You don’t prove an incorporeal reality like you do a corporeal reality
You don’t prove an How much Diet Dr. Pepper incorporeal reality like is in my you do a corporeal Chick-fil-A cup? reality
You don’t prove an How much Diet Dr. Pepper incorporeal reality like is in my you do a corporeal Chick-fil-A cup? reality You don’t answer in Fahrenheit
Points for home
Points for home “What can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them” (Rom. 1:19)
Points for home “What can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them” (Rom. 1:19) I need to understand what I am looking for
Points for home
“ For his invisible attributes, namely, Points for home his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse ” (Rom. 1:20)
“ For his invisible attributes, namely, Points for home his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse ” (Rom. 1:20) I need to recognize what I see
Points for home
“ Although they knew God, they did Points for home not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools ” (Rom. 1:21-22)
“ Although they knew God, they did Points for home not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools ” (Rom. 1:21-22) I need to remember humility
WHY I’M NOT AN ATHEIST
Recommend
More recommend
