why i m not why i m not
play

Why Im NOT Why Im NOT Jewish/ Christian Atheist Agnostic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 15, 2023 •381 likes •1.14k views

Why Im NOT Why Im NOT Jewish/ Christian Atheist Agnostic Hindu Muslim Buddhist GOD Why Im NOT Why Im NOT Jewish/ Christian Atheist Agnostic Hindu Muslim Buddhist GOD Why Im NOT Why Im NOT

  1. Why I’m NOT … Why I’m NOT … Jewish/ Christian Atheist Agnostic Hindu Muslim Buddhist GOD

  2. Why I’m NOT … Why I’m NOT … Jewish/ Christian Atheist Agnostic Hindu Muslim Buddhist GOD

  3. Why I’m NOT … Why I’m NOT … Jewish/ Christian Atheist Agnostic Hindu Muslim Buddhist GOD

  4. Why I’m NOT … Why I’m NOT … Jewish/ Christian Atheist Agnostic Hindu Muslim Buddhist GOD

  5. Agnostics don’t believe in God, but aren’t ready to say they are certain there is no God.

  7. Did benzene cause the Did benzene cause the leukemia? leukemia?

  8. Benzene at 10,000 times the legal limit wouldn’t hurt anybody! Did benzene cause the Did benzene cause the leukemia? leukemia?

  9. Benzene at 10,000 times the legal limit wouldn’t hurt anybody! Benzene X10,000 Did benzene cause the Did benzene cause the leukemia? leukemia?

  10. I have a problem with people who say they believe reality is one thing, but live showing it is something altogether different.

  11. Our view of reality should align perfectly with how we live and how others live

  12. We need to weigh the evidence No God God

  13. There are different kinds of evidence

  14. There are different kinds of evidence

  15. There are different kinds of evidence • Scientific evidence – with limitations

  16. There are different kinds of evidence • Scientific evidence – with limitations • Direct evidence

  17. There are different kinds of evidence • Scientific evidence – with limitations • Direct evidence • Circumstantial evidence

  18. Competing views of reality

  19. Competing views of reality No God

  20. Competing views of reality No God God

  21. Competing views of reality No God God

  22. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals

  23. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals

  24. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some of the chemicals have electrical interactions

  25. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter.

  26. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack of chem/elec. interactions differs from other animals

  27. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others

  28. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others

  29. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing exists to set objective right and wrong. i.e. some chemical interactions are “evil”

  30. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong.

  31. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust

  32. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust

  33. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals God Space -Some chem’s have elec. inter. and time -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. Outside of the universe is an -Space dust is space dust infinite, personal, moral God

  34. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust

  35. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. Humans uniquely bear the image of a moral God -Space dust is space dust

  36. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust

  37. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. Humans exist to be in -Space dust is space dust relationship with God

  38. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. Humans to be in relat. with God -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust

  39. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. Humans to be in relat. with God -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. Humans fail to measure up to -Space dust is space dust God’s moral perfection

  40. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God - Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Humans to be in relat. w/ God -Our sack differs from others -Humans fail to measure up -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust -God restores the relationship

  41. Our view of reality should align perfectly with how we live and how others live

  42. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God - Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Humans to be in relat. w/ God -Our sack differs from others -Humans fail to measure up -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust -God restores the relationship

  43. Competing views of reality No God God There is one reality. Everyone lives on one side or the other regardless of what they believe

  44. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God - Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Humans to be in relat. w/ God -Our sack differs from others -Humans fail to measure up -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust -God restores the relationship

  45. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God - Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Humans to be in relat. w/ God -Our sack differs from others -Humans fail to measure up -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust -God restores the relationship

  46. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God - Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Humans to be in relat. w/ God -Our sack differs from others -Humans fail to measure up -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust -God restores the relationship

  47. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God - Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Humans to be in relat. w/ God -Our sack differs from others -Humans fail to measure up -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust -God restores the relationship

  48. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God - Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Humans to be in relat. w/ God -Our sack differs from others -Humans fail to measure up -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust -God restores the relationship

  49. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Infinite/Person/Moral God - Humans in moral God’s image -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Humans to be in relat. w/ God -Our sack differs from others -Humans fail to measure up -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust -God restores the relationship

  50. We need to weigh the evidence

  51. We need to weigh the evidence Which worldview explains our lives?

  52. We need to weigh the evidence Which worldview explains our lives? No God

  53. We need to weigh the evidence Which worldview explains our lives? No God God

  54. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust

  55. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust

  56. Competing views of reality No God God -Humans are sacks of chemicals -Some chem’s have elec. inter. -Our sack differs from others -Nothing sets obj. right/wrong. -Space dust is space dust

Recommend

More recommend