where are we now and where are we headed next what we ll
play

Where Are We Now and Where Are We Headed Next? What well cover - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Where Are We Now and Where Are We Headed Next? What well cover Scholarly metrics and research impact: quantifying influence and ascribing context in a digital climate Evolving indicators, online attention, and current uses of


  1. Where Are We Now and Where Are We Headed Next?

  2. What we’ll cover • Scholarly metrics and research impact: quantifying influence and ascribing context in a digital climate • Evolving indicators, online attention, and current uses of altmetrics data and tools • Approaches to altmetrics advocacy via strategic engagement and communication

  3. Learning Objectives • Understand the complementary role of altmetrics in scholarly impact assessment • Analyze and apply real-life use cases of altmetrics to a variety of academic and institutional settings • Develop an organization-specific rubric for ongoing altmetrics engagement • Use altmetrics as part of a larger, holistic research evaluation strategy

  4. Schedule Day 1 Day 2 • Altmetrics: background, definitions, and • Altmetrics engagement: developing a landscape in the context of research impact rubric for advocacy and sustainable use at analysis your institution • Understanding the potential and limits of • Advanced applications of altmetrics available altmetrics tools and data throughout the research lifecycle • How are institutions currently incorporating • What’s next: how new technologies can altmetrics into workflows, assessment, and improve and advance altmetrics and foster reporting? a more inclusive, globally representative scholarly ecosystem

  5. Altmetrics & You • How are altmetrics relevant to my current work, and where can I improve and expand their application at my institution, within my department, and in my own daily research practices? • What are altmetrics’ strengths and limitations, and how can we promote a dynamic, complementary approach to assessing scholarly impact? • What questions can altmetrics help me answer using the tools and data currently available? • What future questions might I be able to answer, given coming developments in the field?

  6. Housekeeping • Breaks • Collaborative Notes, Slack, Twitter, etc. • Questions? • Introductions: – A little about you, background with altmetrics, and goals for the course – Start thinking about . . .

  7. What does “impact” mean at your organization? CC-BY HuoangP / Flickr

  8. Altmetrics: background, definitions, and landscape in the context of research impact analysis

  9. Agenda • Existing landscape of research impact evaluation • What altmetrics are • What altmetrics can do (with examples) • Discussion • Activity

  10. Existing landscape of research impact evaluation

  11. Usage statistics

  12. Peer review Flickr/AJ Cann CC BY-SA

  13. Journal Impact Factor Citation counts Relative Citation Ratio H-index Citation-based metrics

  14. Altmetrics.org Priem et al CC-BY Altmetrics

  15. What altmetrics are

  16. Definitions: NISO “Altmetrics is a broad term that encapsulates the digital collection, creation, and use of multiple forms of assessment that are derived from activity and engagement among diverse stakeholders and scholarly outputs in the research ecosystem .”

  17. Our definition “Altmetrics are data that help us understand how often and by whom research objects are discussed, shared, and used on the social Web.” Distinct from - Social media metrics - Usage statistics

  18. Altmetrics data is diverse Example: PlumX metrics sources

  19. altmetrics vs. Altmetric

  20. How common are altmetrics? All research (100MM+) Not to scale/ #s estimated All research tracked (50MM+) All research that’s been mentioned (8.5MM+)

  21. How often research is discussed online?

  22. What altmetrics can do for you

  23. Filter on the Web

  24. Credit for all impact

  25. Engage diverse audiences

  26. Discussion

  27. Activity

  28. • Researcher Role You are Catalina Betancur (INSERM) and you want to find attention • for your research Scenario Find your publications list online • Download the Altmetric Bookmarklet and check out the Altmetric Badges • on a journal’s site where you publish often. Explore the data you find. For existing research, what altmetrics data stand out to you? • Instructions • How can you use these two tools to stay abreast of new attention that your research receives? How would your results change if you were looking up altmetrics for this • paper (“ Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children” )?

  29. BREAK !

  30. Understanding the potential (and limits) of altmetrics tools and data

  31. Benefits of altmetrics

  32. Altmetric can track any digital object produced in the research life-cycle

  33. Challenges

  34. Limitations New and unknown Motivations vs. metrics Gaming Consistency Scope Verification Altmetrics != impact

  35. We can’t we measure impact CC-BY Sean MacEntee / Flickr

  36. Less impact than indicators… Mostly Attention, sometimes influence . . . maybe downstream “impact”?

  37. “Impact” defined

  38. ➔ Citations ➔ Contribution to the knowledge base ➔ Citations ➔ Change in understanding of a disease, disorder or condition ➔ Implementation of policy or ➔ Mentions in policy documents, legislation legal code ➔ Change in clinical or research ➔ PubMed Central views practice ➔ Enhancement of community ➔ Discussions on social media, health, culture mainstream media ➔ Economic benefits ➔ Mentions in patents From: https://becker.wustl.edu/impact-assessment/how-to-use

  39. Other Examples?

  40. What does “impact” mean at your organization? CC-BY HuoangP / Flickr

  41. Altmetrics tools: a run-down

  42. Plum Analytics/PlumX • Commercial, Owned by Elsevier • Include many types of metrics, including usage statistics, altmetrics, and some citation metrics • Public profiles, institution, department, author, and item- level metrics • Work with all types of outputs • Categorize metrics into five areas (usage, captures, mentions, social media, and citations)

  43. Advantages Drawbacks • Some unique data sources (EBSCO stats, • Cannot access the underlying data for many of their clinical citations) sources • Nice visualizations • No context for the numbers they provide • Have the backing of a company (Elsevier) • Plum uses metrics that are hard to verify against with ample resources that has expressed gaming (Facebook likes, EBSCO download stats, commitment to fixing some of the problems etc.) with existing metrics -- • Metrics categorization lumps unlike metrics in with each other, can lead to confusion and abuse Example: • Access info about other institutions/individuals They have introduced the CiteScore, source requires purchase of additional product, PlumX normalized impact per paper, and other metrics Benchmarks that improve upon problematic data

  44. Impactstory • Non-profit, funded by the NSF and Alfred P Sloan Foundation • Co-founded by Jason Priem who coined the phrase altmetrics • Source their data from Altmetric, based on content that’s in ORCID profiles (which users have to set up) • Offer Achievement badges, based on your metrics • Oriented towards meeting the needs of social-savvy scientists

  45. Advantages Drawbacks • Founded by researchers, who are • Don’t necessarily meet the needs of those who passionate about incentivizing open aren’t social-savvy science • Focused on STEM researcher community • Provide excellent context for data in • Don’t offer services for those in the humanities Achievement or social sciences, and don’t care to • The app code and data are both open source and intended to be reused by others

  46. Altmetric • Founded by a scientist • Small data science company, owned by Digital Science • Altmetric Attention score and donut started as a publisher tool, on hundreds of journals and thousands of websites across the world • Institutional platform (+ additional products), the Altmetric Explorer, which allows researchers, departments, and institutions to track their altmetrics and across entire database of over 8M other mentioned works • EFI works for books, articles, data, and any other type of scholarly output--including clinical trials • We track discussions of research in 15 distinct sources

  47. Advantages Drawbacks • Altmetric Attention Score is intended for at-a- • We have the best coverage in many sources, glance understanding of basic volume of attention, including the best news coverage, coverage in but is a single-number indicator that could be policy documents worldwide, blogs, etc. abused. • Excellent data visualizations • We attempt transparency in our weighting and • Ability to search our entire corpus by ISSN, score as we can, many factors that can influence an identifiers, search term article’s score, so we can’t fully make the • A number of free products, including the calculation transparent, it’s simply too much Bookmarklet, Explorer for Librarians, and information. our free (limited) API • Limitation for some: we don’t have author-level • We offer context for the Altmetric attention profiles score by publication date, source journal, and • Heavier coverage in STEM areas date within publication source • Limited by quality of data ingested, licensing restrictions

Recommend


More recommend