WHEEL OF FORTUNE Operational Benefits of Product Wheel Scheduling Peter L. King – Zinata Alan Nall - Zinata
APICS 2017 Session Evaluation Visit www.apics.org/Monday or download the APICS2017 app 2 #APICS2017
PETER L KING peter.king@Zinata.com BS Electrical Engineering – Virginia Tech DuPont Company – 42 years R & D – 9 years Project management – 15 years Lean manufacturing & supply chain consulting – 18 years Lean Dynamics – 2007 to present Consult with companies in process industries Zinata – 2014 to present Consult on Product Wheel design/implementation , Value Stream Mapping Lean for the Process Industries – Productivity Press, 2009 The Product Wheel Handbook – Productivity Press, 2013 Value Stream Mapping for the Process Industries – Productivity Press, 2015 Several articles in IE Magazine, APICS Magazine, Target (AME) Frequent speaker at IIE, APICS, ASQ, OpEx conferences 3 #APICS2017
AGENDA Why Product Wheels? Product Wheel concept Wheel Design Basics Case study - vitamin pill packaging Making it real – simplifying daily operation Other prominent Product Wheel users Q & A 4 #APICS2017
IT HAS OFTEN BEEN SAID THAT ….. 75% of the problems on the plant floor are caused by processes outside the plant floor 5 #APICS2017
PRODUCTION SCHEDULING IS OFTEN THE CULPRIT Production scheduling is often based on what needs to be produced within the next planning period Without any view of the full manufacturing system Without an understanding of the full product line-up Therefore opportunities for optimization are often missed Opportunities to standardize schedules Opportunities to standardize sequences Opportunities to simplify changeovers Opportunities to optimize frequency of low volume items 6 #APICS2017
THE SOLUTION PRODUCT WHEELS Allow you to optimize production scheduling In an integrated, holistic design process In a way that has enabled major manufacturers to save millions $$ Higher throughput – higher revenue Reduced inventories – reduced working capital = $$ Improved customer service performance – increased market share With increased stability – reducing the chaos With increased predictability – better forward planning 7 #APICS2017
PRODUCT WHEEL CONCEPT A regularly repeating PRODUCTS (SPOKES) sequence of the production of the various products K A J The overall cycle time is fixed B The cycle time is optimized o I based on business C priorities D H The sequence is fixed E G F The sequence is optimized o for minimum changeover loss (time or material) CHANGE-OVERS 8 #APICS2017
PRODUCT WHEEL CONCEPT Spokes can have different lengths, based on the Demand for each product The amount actually produced 19097 53124 53125 53129 55412 41628 51381 can vary from cycle to cycle, based 46077 13412 on actual consumption 19852 3809 19955 30282 Some low-volume products may 53181 13045 not be made every cycle 45211 55347 When they are made, it’s always 30173 at the same point in the sequence 57601 32689 13775 Make-to-order and Make-to- stock products can be intermixed LINE 3 - CYCLE 1 on a wheel 9 #APICS2017
PRODUCT WHEEL CONCEPT WHEEL TIME ONE CYCLE, ONE REVOLUTION PRODUCT A A BREATHING ROOM H CHANGEOVER G BATCHES B F SPOKE, . CAMPAIGN E C PRODUCT F D CHANGEOVER 10 #APICS2017
PRODUCT WHEEL APPLICABILITY Product wheels can be applied to a single major piece of process equipment A resin reactor A paint mixer A vitamin tablet compression machine A ketchup homogenizer Or to an entire line A shampoo bottling line A potato chip packaging line. 11 #APICS2017
PRODUCT WHEEL APPLICABILITY Product wheels support a Pull replenishment system Each spoke is designed based on average historical demand or on the forecast What is actually produced on any spoke is just enough to replenish what has been consumed from inventory Low volume products won’t be made unless needed Product wheels can be employed in a Make-to-Stock (MTS) or a Make-to-Order (MTO) environment MTS and MTO products can be made on the same wheel 12 #APICS2017
2 ∗ 𝐷𝑃𝐷 ∗ 𝐸 𝐹𝑃𝑅 = 𝑊 ∗ 𝑠 ∗ (1 − 𝐸 𝑄𝑆 ) PRODUCT WHEEL DESIGN 13 #APICS2017
PRODUCT WHEELS ARE BASED ON A THOROUGH ANALYSIS OF … Your process as an integrated system SUPPLIER 1 CUSTOMERS, DISTRIBUTORS Order Lead 1 week Time Quantity/time 5.4 M #/Mo 6 # SKUs 7.5 K #/Hr TAKT Lead time Exp 4 Days Frequency 5 Trucks/Day BONDING WRAPPING Lot Size 36 K#/Truck SHEET CASTING SLITTING INSPECTION PACKAGING (HEAT TREATING) (3) (3) (1) 2 Days Transp time 6 (3) 3 2 LABELING 3 3 RAIL CARS 3 M# 2.6 M# 8.9 M # Invtry Invtry Invtry 60 K # Invtry Max Demo Max Demo Max Demo Max Demo Max Demo SUPPLIER 2 18.6 18 51 14.5 15 Rate Rate Rate Days 16 Days 15 Hours 8 Days 50 1.2 M # Rate Rate Invtry 13.8 Eff Capac 18 36 10.6 Eff Capac Eff Capac 8.25 Eff Capac Eff Capac Frequency 1 Car/Day 50 100 2,000 Order Lead 5.6 # SKUs # SKUs # SKUs 1000 # SKUs 1 Week Days TAKT 7.5 Time TAKT 8.1 7.5 TAKT 7.5 TAKT 8.3 TAKT Lot Size 190 K # 6 4 # SKUs # SKUs K #/Hour K #/Hour K #/Hour K #/Hour K #/Hour Transp time 7 Days 78% 59% Utilization 91% Utilization 42% 21% Utilization Utilization Utilization 15 Min 6 min Lead time 15 Min Lead time 18 Min Lead time Lead time Lead time 8 Min 92% 100% Yield 93% 98% Yield Yield Yield 100% Yield 85% 72% 100% 70% Reliability Reliability 82% Reliability Reliability Reliability 55% 100% OEE 73% OEE 74% OEE OEE OEE 70% # SKUs 50 100 # SKUs 1000 # SKUs 1000 # SKUs 2000 # SKUs 1 roll 1 roll Batch size 1 roll Batch size 1 Slit Roll Batch size Batch size Batch size 1 Slit Roll 7 days N/A CYCLE 9 days CYCLE 13 days CYCLE CYCLE CYCLE N/A C/O time 1 hr 45 Min C/O time 5 Min C/O time 0 C/O time 0 C/O time 1 Roll 0 0 C/O loss C/O loss ~ 0 C/O loss ~ 0 C/O loss C/O loss Avail time 168 hr/wk Avail time 168 hr/wk Avail time 168 hr/wk Avail time 168 hr/wk Avail time 168 hr/wk Shift schd 3 x 8 x 7 Shift schd 3 x 8 x 7 Shift schd 3 x 8 x 7 Shift schd 3 x 8 x 7 Shift schd 3 x 8 x 7 14 #APICS2017
PRODUCT WHEELS ARE BASED ON A THOROUGH ANALYSIS OF … HOURS HOURS BOTTLE BOTTLE TYPE DESSICANT # BOTTLE HOURS PER ITEM FCST AVERAGE TABLET COLOR PER 2 PER SIZE COLOR MONTH WEEKS WEEK AB207 102000 N/A 500CC SHORT-PET D546 CLEAR 73.6 36.8 18.4 AB302 49303 N/A 500CC SHORT-PET D546 CLEAR 35.6 17.8 8.9 AB206 52234 N/A 500CC SHORT-PET NONE CLEAR 33.0 16.5 8.2 6.8 3.4 1.7 AB203 12447 N/A 400CC PET NONE LT BROWN 4.8 2.4 1.2 AA105 9500 N/A 400CC PET NONE LT BROWN Your product line-up as an 23.7 11.8 5.9 AC101 25796 N/A 400CC PET NONE GREEN interrelated group of things 22.7 11.4 5.7 AD401 32821 WHITE 400CC PET NONE GREEN AD221 41221 N/A 400CC PET NONE YELLOW 20.8 10.4 5.2 with varying degrees of AC301 29888 N/A 400CC PET NONE YELLOW 20.7 10.3 5.2 similarity AC201 27207 N/A 400CC PET NONE YELLOW 18.1 9.0 4.5 AB205 12792 N/A 400CC PET NONE YELLOW 7.0 3.5 1.8 AA101 3200 N/A 400CC HDPE NONE LIME 3.1 1.6 0.8 7.8 3.9 1.9 AA104 6462 N/A 400CC HDPE NONE LIME 5.1 2.5 1.3 AA103 5247 N/A 400CC HDPE NONE LIME 3.3 1.7 0.8 AA102 3407 N/A 400CC HDPE NONE LIME 16.8 8.4 4.2 AB207 25262 N/A 400CC HDPE NONE EGGSHELL AD201 33992 N/A 400CC HDPE NONE BLUE 40.9 20.4 10.2 AC441 44016 N/A 400CC HDPE NONE BLUE 30.5 15.2 7.6 15 #APICS2017
PRODUCT WHEEL DESIGN Step 1 - Decide which assets would benefit 16 #APICS2017
SHEET FORMING VIRTUAL CELL GROUPING Roll Forming Roll Forming Roll Forming Roll Forming Machine 1 Machine 2 Machine 3 Machine 4 Roll Bonder 1 Roll Bonder 2 Roll Bonder 3 Roll Bonder 4 CELL 3 Roll Slitting Roll Slitting Roll Slitting Machine 1 Machine 2 Machine 3 CELL 2 CELL 1 CELL 4 Chopper Chopper Chopper 1 2 3 Packaging Packaging 17 #APICS2017
Recommend
More recommend