universal quantum constraints on the butterfly effect
play

Universal quantum constraints on the butterfly effect Antonio M. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Universal quantum constraints on the butterfly effect Antonio M. Garca-Garca arXiv:1510.08870 The out of equilibrium birth of a superfluid Phys. Rev. X 5, 021015 (2015) David Berenstein UC Santa Barbara Hong Liu Paul Chesler MIT


  1. Universal quantum constraints on the butterfly effect Antonio M. García-García arXiv:1510.08870 The out of equilibrium birth of a superfluid Phys. Rev. X 5, 021015 (2015) David Berenstein UC Santa Barbara Hong Liu Paul Chesler MIT Harvard

  2. Butterfly effect Classical chaos Lorenz 60’s Meteorology Hadamard 1898 Alexandr Lyapunov 1892 Pesin theorem Difficult to compute!

  3. Role of classical chaos in the Quantum limit chaos? Quantum butterfly effect? Disordered system Relaxation time Larkin, Ovchinnikov, Soviet Physics JETP 28, 1200 (1969) Altshuler, Lancaster lectures Chaotic Integrable

  4. Quantum Physica 91A 450 (1978) chaos? Mapping of operators in Heisenberg picture Projection on coherent states = classical map + quantum corrections

  5. Quantum butterfly effect

  6. Quantum classical transition Why is quantum Quantum chaos relevant? Information Prepare a classically chaotic system Couple it to a thermal reservoir Compute the growth of the entanglement entropy by integrating the reservoir

  7. Zurek-Paz conjecture Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2508 (1994) Oscillators + thermal bath Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1187 (1993) Decohorence is controlled by classical chaos not the reservoir! Numerical Yes, but… evidence?

  8. Coupled kicked tops Phys. Rev. E 67 (2003) 066201 Not always

  9. Noisy environment Quantum Baker map Alicki, 2003 Any environment may limit the growth of the entanglement entropy!

  10. Why should you care at all about this? Fast Scramblers Sekino, Susskind,JHEP 0810:065,2008 P. Hayden, J. Preskill, JHEP 0709 (2007) 120 1. Most rapid scramblers take a time logarithmic in N 2. Matrix quantum mechanics saturate the bound 3. Black holes are the fastest scramblers in nature (Quantum) black Strongly coupled AdS/CFT hole physics (quantum) QFT

  11. Why? All thermal horizon Rest charge at � are locally isomorphic Stretched horizon to Rindler geometry � Rindler! Spread of charge density Like quantum chaos! Scrambling time black hole Black hole are Typical Scrambling time fast(est) scramblers

  12. Dual interpretation of scrambling Barbon, Magan, PRD 84, 106012 (2011) Chaotic fast scrambling at black holes Only Quasinormal modes M.C.Gutzwiller Chaos in Classical Finite N Probe in a hyperbolic “billiard” and Quantum Mechanics Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990 Hard chaos Only for small systems

  13. Black holes and the butterfly effect Shenker, Stanford, arXiv:1306.0622 Sensitivity to initial conditions in the dual field theory Holography calculation 2+1 BTZ Mild pertubation BTZ shock waves Mutual information

  14. Large N CFT Not in agreement with the Zurek-Paz conjecture Exponential growth has to do with classical chaos ? Lyapunov exponent is a classical quantity

  15. How is this related to quantum information? Berenstein,AGG arXiv:1510.08870 Are there universal bounds on Lyapunov exponents and the semiclassical growth of the EE? How universal? Environment Quantumness

  16. Quantumness: Size of Hilbert space limits growth of EE Discrete time

  17. Classical Lyapunov exponents larger than log N do not enter in semiclassical expressions Quantum information S. Bravyi, Phys. Rev. A 76, 052319 (2007). F. Verstraete et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 170501 (2013). Bipartite systems No semiclassical interpretation

  18. Arnold cat map

  19. 1d lattice of cat maps time step = effective light-crossing time per site Entanglement is a local phenomenon Also but Thermalization of Strongly Coupled Field Theories Only for deBoer, Vakkuri, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 191601(2011) Entanglement Tsunami (not V) Liu, Suh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 011601 (2014)

  20. Bound induced by the environment Single particle coupled to a thermal bath Aslangul et al., Journal of Statistical Physics (1985) 40, 167 Random force correlation QM Noise limits the butterfly effect

  21. Maximum (?) Rate of information loss Membrane paradigm Rindler geometry

  22. Causality constraints Stretched Horizon + Quantum Noise Forward Light Cone Intersection light cone with stretched horizon Large times QM induces entanglement but also limits its growth

  23. Brownian motion in AdS/CFT deBoer, Hubeny,JHEP 0907:094,2009 Hawking radiation

  24. In preparation

  25. Quantum mechanics induces entanglement but also limits its growth rate Environment modifies the semiclassical analysis of the entanglement growth rate Is the growth rate bound universal beyond the semiclassical limit? To what extent is the environment effect universal, extremal black hole? Can holography say something about it? Not easy!

  26. The out of equilibrium birth of a superfluid Phys. Rev. X 5, 021015 (2015) Paul Chesler Hong Liu Harvard MIT Broken phase Unbroken Phase T c T(t)

  27. Kibble Causality J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9: 1387. (1976) Vortices in Generation of the sky Structure Cosmic strings Krusius, 2006 Weyler, Nature 2008

  28. No evidence so far ! CMB, galaxy distributions… NASA/WMAP

  29. � Zurek Nature 317 (1985) 505 Adiabatic Frozen Adiabatic t T c Kibble-Zurek mechanism

  30. KZ scaling with the quench speed Too few defects

  31. Issues with KZ Too many defects Adiabatic at t freeze ? Defects without a condensate? is relevant Chesler, AGG, Liu Phys. Rev. X 5, 021015 (2015)

  32. Slow Quenches Linear response Scaling KZ Frozen Adiabatic US Frozen Coarsening Adiabatic � �� ���� ������

  33. Non adiabatic growth after t freeze

  34. Linear response Growth Unstable Modes Protocol

  35. Slow quenches Correlation length increases Condensate growth Adiabatic evolution # Defects

  36. Breaking of scaling Fast quenches Exponential growth Number of defects Independent of

  37. Holography? Defects survive large N limit Universality Real time

  38. Dual gravity theory Herzog, Horowitz, Hartnoll, Gubser Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates Probe limit

  39. EOM’s: PDE’s in x,y,r,t = 0 Boundary conditions: hep-th/9905104v2 r   1309.1439 Science 2013 Drive: No solution of Einstein equations but do not worry, Hubeny 2008 Dictionary:

  40. Stochastic driving Field theory: Quantum/thermal fluctuations Gravity: Hawking radiation

  41. Predictions Mean field critical exponents Slow quenches: Fast quenches:

  42. Movies!!

  43. Adiabatic Non adiabatic

  44. Full width half max of Strong coarsening

  45. Slow Fast �� �/� � ��/� Slow Fast Relevant for 4 He ? ~25 times less defects than KZ prediction!!

  46. Freezing time Condensate formation Defect generation Phase coherence ?

Recommend


More recommend