UK European ATM Stakeholders Forum 2 nd November 2011
Agenda • • Admin/Intros Admin/Intros Eurocontrol Consultation Mechanism (post-reform) Eurocontrol Consultation Mechanism (post-reform) • • SESAR – A GA Perspective SESAR – A GA Perspective • • • • SES/SESAR – An MoD Perspective SES/SESAR – An MoD Perspective • • SESAR – General update SESAR – General update • • SES – General Update SES – General Update • • Performance Scheme – NPP update Performance Scheme – NPP update • • EASA EASA • • Airport Observatory/Package Airport Observatory/Package AOB & Next Meeting AOB & Next Meeting • •
Eurocontrol Consultation Arrangements Steve Hand (CAA)
AAB Consultation Arrangements Wednesday 2 nd November 2011 4
New Eurocontrol V.17 EUROCONTROL Agency Reform – Proposed Governance* and Consultation SCG Workshop 07.Dec.2010 Arrangements SRC Decision Level Audit Provisional Council Board 38 Member States (civil and military) as “owners” of the Organisation define scope and mission PRC EC * The governance for the Network Manager function „reinforced“ Air Navigation Services Board (Supervisory Mandated Decision will have to be factored in, Board of the Agency) SSC Level based on the related IR ICB Members: MIL, ANSP, AO, Airports PDR NMF PDATM Director General Eurocontrol ? NMB DCRCO DMUAC Agency Advisory Body PRB Members: REG, MIL, ANSP, AO, Airports, Manufacturers, …( - similar to SCG + OCG + CMIC) Dealing with: NM pillar issues, Single Sky and SESAR pillar issues as per EC/ SJU request/ Framework Agreements EASA Network Operations Admin. Sounding Body Board (former SBs CFMU + CND) Directorate Directorate Network Management Directorate Single Sky SESAR & Research Technical (CNS) Aeronautical Airspace Airport Safety Security Infrastructure Info. Mgmt. Management Operations (COM/ tech ANT/ SUR ) + SWIM (ODSG + ops ANT) AGR AGAT Pan-pillar, activity-based and (in general) timely restricted Expert Groups Definition, coordination and monitoring of Expert Groups by AAB in accordance with objectives set by ANSB and requested by Directors 5 Colour Code: Eurocontrol Organisation Ectl Agency Decision Level Mandated Decision Level Consultation Level Team &Expert Level Customer-Supplier-Relation
Draft outline workplan for AAB TF Revised ToR after TF/1 Joint Session Proposal for AAB/1 TF/1 TF/2 sub-structures May 2011 12 July 14 Sep Oct 2011 Agency Agency Output Input Input of TF/2 for TF/1 for TF/2 Review Agree way Endorse TF redrafted ToR TF Report Redrafted ToR forward: interim Report to AAB/1 and for 8 Teams acceptance of Corrections exemptions PD ATM List of critical ToR and revision invite for coordination of sub-structures Team activities nomination Mapping of ToR to draft AWP 6
MAIN INTERACTIONS AAB Network Airport CNS AIM/SWIM Safety Security Research Training Ops Ops Infra NMB 7
STRUCTURE AAB NMB Network Airport CNS AIM/SWIM Safety Security Research Training Ops Ops Infra CODA EAD AFSCG RSWG UG SSG SAF REP ACCCT Virtual SUR TF TF STATFOR AI OPS SG WAKE UG SG VORTEX SH SAG RMA TF PSG FEAST APDSG TOD WG UG SISG SGEG ACID ELPAC ASMSG UG SIPN SSTF CDTF SG CAPLAN RST SG UG FREQ NAV COM NSG CG SG SG DATALINK FMTP COM COM ODSG SG SG RNDSG VOTE SAT 8
PERFORMANCE BASED OPERATION - principles - 1. All Teams shall develop, and distribute by correspondence to the AAB, their yearly work programme, derived from the ATM MP and the Agency WP 2. All Teams shall submit through correspondence an annual report to the AAB, assessing their performance against the yearly work programme. 3. All Teams shall assess annually the performance of their subordinated working arrangements and the need for keeping them active, in line with the work programme. 4. All Teams, shall assess, on an annual basis, the satisfaction of their members with the functioning of their group 9
So, what does this proposal bring ? A coherent, managed, performance based consultation process Significant streamlining streamlining and simplification and simplification Significant An opportunity for Agency partners to be involved, An opportunity for Agency partners to be involved, while being able to prioritise and optimise their while being able to prioritise and optimise their involvement involvement A framework for cross- -Directorate harmonisation and Directorate harmonisation and A framework for cross pan- -European coordination European coordination pan The basis for establishing the Cooperative Decision The basis for establishing the Cooperative Decision making process of the Network Manager, as per making process of the Network Manager, as per the IR the IR 10
QUESTIONS ? 11
SESAR – A GA Perspective Ben Stanley (AOPA)
Managing risk in SESAR An Airspace User (GA) Perspective 2 November 2011 London 13
Why are we here? Some reminders from the EP agenda …insists that the "Single European Sky" legislation and SESAR do not lead to disproportionate and excessively costly technological requirements for small aircraft operated under VFR, while fully recognising that all aircraft using controlled …believes that it should be one of the airspace must feature equipment providing for an adequate level of safety, such as objectives to provide Visual Flight positioning devices Rules (VFR) users with access to traffic, meteorological and aeronautical information in a user-friendly and cost- …expects that the introduction of a system of Air Traffic Management with state-of-the-art effective way and innovative technologies within the framework of the SESAR Joint Undertaking would contribute to fighting fragmentation of European airspace and its forecasted congestion and would significantly increase airspace capacity, which will benefit all airspace users, including general and business aviation …underlines, however, that the SESAR programme must fully take into account the specificities of general and business aviation and deliver real benefits to the sector without placing unnecessary burdens on it 14
And a quick reminder of SESAR Performance Safety “The SESAR project aims to integrate and coordinate Four Pillars of the research and development Single European Sky activities which were previously undertaken in a dispersed and uncoordinated manner” New Technology Airport Capacity One of the key reasons SESAR was introduced was to de-risk the move from R&D to deployment for all stakeholders, through: • Part funding by the European Commission • Aligning R&D activities 15
What SESAR means for GA: The ATM Master Plan • The European ATM Master Plan – forms the basis for the SESAR development phase – is produced/maintained by the SESAR JU for the European Commission • A next update cycle has just kicked off; update expected Q2/2012 – will be able to view the expectations for implementation by stakeholder group – focused on network performance 16
GA in the ATM Master Plan • The first version of the master plan recognised five roles of airspace users In unmanaged airspace, the only requirement is for ADS- B OUT using low-cost system to be developed by 2011 Commercial Operators - Legacy Airlines, (e.g. UAT) Low Fare Airlines, Regional Airlines VFR Only GA - Low-End GA IFR Capable GA - Business Aviation (BA), In addition to VFR requirements, the following enablers High-End GA, VLJ Operators, IFR Helicopter will be deployed: Operators, factory demonstrations and flight - SBAS: install SATNAV system to utilise SBAS by 2011; trials etc. - ADS-B IN: install equipment to be selected through R&D after 2011; Military and State Aviation (GAT and OAT) - Enhance IFR Approach & Landing capabilities; - SWIM connection, including Processing reception of UAV/UAS Operators (civil and military) aeronautical information and Meteo data. 17
But what are GA’s objectives going forwards? Fully in line with recent NextGen Advisory Committee findings 18
GA concerns • Specific GA risks seem to be ignored at present: will the future ATM System… – …consider the safety of the whole airspace and all within it? – …be able to cope with unscheduled operations? – …put forward equipage requirements that lead to restrictions in airspace access? Is SESAR purely a CAT programme? 19
What are IAOPA doing to help de- risk the future for GA and others? • ‘Airspace user’ support to the SJU – Integrated in over 100 projects • GA and rotorcraft contributions to the “SESAR Conops At A Glance” – Identifies GA/R specific future vision for operations, including gaps – Identifies Comms, Nav, Sur and ATM (SWIM) needs – Identifies issues relevant to GA with deployment of CNS-ATM; e.g. certification requirements, equipment characteristics etc 20
Recommend
More recommend
